"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:4njlv2hqkbner19bpp8j3mjs19nbv55o10@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:21:05 GMT, "Pete" <not@this.address>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Does what I am doing make more sense now? I may as well get the more fully
>>featured hardware especially if I can pay less for it and it will do the
>>same job, have a stronger signal and give me more future upgarde options.
>>
>>Will it work thought?
>
>
> Yes, it should... it might be silly to mention now as I
> probably overlooked it, but I'm also assuming the iMac has a
> wired ethernet adapter in it already to connect to the
> Buffalo router #2.

Thanks Kony

The iMac does have a built in ethernet adapter port. I have plugged it
directly into my cable modem and it went on the net fine.

Bearing in mind I can get the higher speed buffalo wireless router cheaper
than the ethernet bridge, is there any reason not to do what I have
suggested? It gives me the option of having a wireless router or a bridge in
the future.

regards

Pete