On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:13:16 -0700, Kurt <labolide@spacegmail.com> wrote
in <labolide-F06FE0.13131616032007@news.giganews.com>:

>In article <feflv21v6n4raq0r39vei2timkegahit4f@4ax.com>,
> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:54:55 -0700, Kurt <labolide@spacegmail.com> wrote
>> in <labolide-DA9136.12545515032007@news.giganews.com>:
>>
>> >In article <63tiv2lnotabn9v6648p0pdps7okq4stoh@4ax.com>,
>>
>> > John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> >> My practice is to use the best tool for the job at hand. For some of my
>> >> professional work, that will be Solaris on a Sun workstation. For other
>> >> things, that will be Windows, BSD, or Linux on an Intel machine. For
>> >> still other things, that will be a Mac, especially when my client is
>> >> using Macs. (For what it's worth, my personal machine of choice is
>> >> Windows XP with guest BSD and Linux on an IBM ThinkPad T41.)
>> >
>> >Which Mac?
>>
>> What possible relevance or importance would that have in this context?
>> I've used lots of different Macs. Do you want a complete list? How far
>> back must I go? Do you also want the model numbers of the Sun
>> workstation, all the non-Mac Intel boxes, and the configuration of my
>> personal ThinkPad?
>
>So you don't actually own any Macs.

I didn't say that. Read more carefully.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>