DTC wrote:
> SMS wrote:
> > In *all areas of the country* Verizon coverage was better than Cingular
> > service in the most extensive independent surveys.
>
> John Navas wrote:
>> My observations are based on numerous carefully-controlled tests of
>> multiple handsets throughout the *greater San Francisco Bay Area*.
>
> Apples to oranges

Worse than apples to oranges.

We're comparing independent surveys with tens of thousands of
respondents and an extremely low margin of error, with the alleged
experiences of a single user, a user that has a long history of
fabricating stories. He is absolutely insanely angry that no independent
surveys support his shilling.

[Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular
posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name is going away,
and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding AT&T's
Wireless Service.]