>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
>> service.
>
> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>47739d32.5167765@news.individual.net on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>
>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>
>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
>>> service.
>>
>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>
>If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>
You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:43:35 -0700, Gene Jones <jasin@janus.com>
wrote:
>bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>why are you putting your reply at the top?
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> 47739d32.5167765@news.individual.net on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>>
>>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>>
>>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be
>>>> of
>>>> service.
>>>
>>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>>
>> If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>> directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>> conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>>
>
> You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.
I feel fine... but either you are or you are not the one who posted the info
I responded to. If you are not sure, well, then you need more help than I
suspected. Frankly I think you are but am not interested enough to even
check headers.
--
One who makes no mistakes, never makes anything.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:34:00 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>475e409f.1169109@news.individual.net on 12/10/07 6:36 AM:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>> 47739d32.5167765@news.individual.net on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>>>
>>>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>>>
>>>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be
>>>>> of
>>>>> service.
>>>>
>>>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>>>
>>> If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>>> directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>>> conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>>>
>>
>> You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.
>
>I feel fine... but either you are or you are not the one who posted the info
>I responded to. If you are not sure, well, then you need more help than I
>suspected. Frankly I think you are but am not interested enough to even
>check headers.
Yes, I said so, you ARE confused. I know what I am posting, but
obviously you don't know what or where you're posting.
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:34:00 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> 475e409f.1169109@news.individual.net on 12/10/07 6:36 AM:
>>
>>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>> 47739d32.5167765@news.individual.net on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> service.
>>>>>
>>>>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>>>>
>>>> If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>>>> directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>>>> conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.
>>
>> I feel fine... but either you are or you are not the one who posted the info
>> I responded to. If you are not sure, well, then you need more help than I
>> suspected. Frankly I think you are but am not interested enough to even
>> check headers.
>
> Yes, I said so, you ARE confused. I know what I am posting, but
> obviously you don't know what or where you're posting.
>
Well, back to the topic:
You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
clients). You went off topic after that.
Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
> >> There's nothing "free" about it.
> >>
> >> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
> >> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
> >> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
> >> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
> >> FON Spots worldwide!"
> >>
> >> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
> >> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
> >> I were willing.
> >>
> >> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
> >> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
> >> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
> >>
> >> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
> >> then sharing it "free?"
> >>
> >> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
> >
> >It won't have been killed by then?
>
> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:23:57 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>In article <476e9a33.4401500@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> >> There's nothing "free" about it.
>> >>
>> >> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
>> >> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
>> >> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
>> >> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
>> >> FON Spots worldwide!"
>> >>
>> >> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
>> >> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
>> >> I were willing.
>> >>
>> >> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
>> >> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
>> >> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
>> >>
>> >> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
>> >> then sharing it "free?"
>> >>
>> >> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
>> >
>> >It won't have been killed by then?
>>
>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>Why are you posting this in a Mac group?
I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
wildly!!
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:23:57 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> >In article <476e9a33.4401500@news.individual.net>,
> > bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> >> There's nothing "free" about it.
> >> >>
> >> >> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
> >> >> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
> >> >> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
> >> >> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
> >> >> FON Spots worldwide!"
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
> >> >> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
> >> >> I were willing.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
> >> >> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
> >> >> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
> >> >>
> >> >> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
> >> >> then sharing it "free?"
> >> >>
> >> >> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
> >> >
> >> >It won't have been killed by then?
> >>
> >> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
> >
> >Why are you posting this in a Mac group?
>
> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
> wildly!!
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:19:16 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>47625e41.8755031@news.individual.net on 12/10/07 8:43 AM:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:34:00 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>> 475e409f.1169109@news.individual.net on 12/10/07 6:36 AM:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>>> 47739d32.5167765@news.individual.net on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>>>>> directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>>>>> conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.
>>>
>>> I feel fine... but either you are or you are not the one who posted the info
>>> I responded to. If you are not sure, well, then you need more help than I
>>> suspected. Frankly I think you are but am not interested enough to even
>>> check headers.
>>
>> Yes, I said so, you ARE confused. I know what I am posting, but
>> obviously you don't know what or where you're posting.
>>
>Well, back to the topic:
>
>You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>clients). You went off topic after that.
Well , you thought you answered. Off topic? you obviously don't know
what that mean.
>Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
No thank you. If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have
the patience to educate you.
The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
a success, they have to lower the price.
>--
>I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
>
>
>
>
>> Well, back to the topic:
>>
>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>
> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
do get confused easily.
>
>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>
> Well , you thought you answered.
Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
continue to assist you.
Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>
> No thank you.
Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to educate
> you.
Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
you have gotten confused.
>
> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
> a success, they have to lower the price.
My responses are free... and priceless.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>
>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>
>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>
>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>
>Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>do get confused easily.
>>
>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>
>> Well , you thought you answered.
>
>Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>
>Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>continue to assist you.
>
>Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>
>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>
>While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>
>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>
>> No thank you.
>
>Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>
>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to educate
>> you.
>
>Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>you have gotten confused.
>>
>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>
>My responses are free... and priceless.
You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
answering.
It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
me to advice you over usenet.
Good Luck!
>--
>Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
>walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
>
>
>
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:19:16 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>In article <475e4752.697937@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:23:57 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>> >In article <476e9a33.4401500@news.individual.net>,
>> > bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> There's nothing "free" about it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
>> >> >> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
>> >> >> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
>> >> >> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
>> >> >> FON Spots worldwide!"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
>> >> >> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
>> >> >> I were willing.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
>> >> >> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
>> >> >> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
>> >> >> then sharing it "free?"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
>> >> >
>> >> >It won't have been killed by then?
>> >>
>> >> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>> >
>> >Why are you posting this in a Mac group?
>>
>> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
>> wildly!!
>>
>>Thank you for the support!
>
>So why do you do it?
If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
will.
>
>--
>Sandman[.net]
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>
>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>
>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>
>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>
>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>> do get confused easily.
>>>
>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>
>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>
>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>
>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>> continue to assist you.
>>
>> Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>> clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>> button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>> generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>> follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>> group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>> the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>> immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>> being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>> is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>> usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>>
>>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>>
>> While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>> case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>>
>>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>>
>>> No thank you.
>>
>> Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>> question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>>
>>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>>> educate
>>> you.
>>
>> Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>> you have gotten confused.
>>>
>>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>>
>> My responses are free... and priceless.
>
> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought.
Where do you disagree with me? I am fine if you do, though I find it quite
telling that you voice your disagreement so rudely and while I you claim I
am "clueless" you point to not a single error in my claims.
> You haven't undestood one single piece of my postings!
I understood your question: You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
not mine.
<snip />
--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
> >"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
> >4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
> >
> >>> Well, back to the topic:
> >>>
> >>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
> >>
> >> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
> >
> >Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
> >do get confused easily.
> >>
> >>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
> >>> clients). You went off topic after that.
> >>
> >> Well , you thought you answered.
> >
> >Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
> >you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
> >
> >Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
> >other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
> >continue to assist you.
> >
> >Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
> >clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
> >button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
> >generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
> >follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
> >group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
> >the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
> >immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
> >being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
> >is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
> >usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
> >
> >> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
> >
> >While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
> >case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
> >
> >>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
> >>
> >> No thank you.
> >
> >Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
> >question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
> >
> >> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
> >> educate
> >> you.
> >
> >Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
> >you have gotten confused.
> >>
> >> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
> >> a success, they have to lower the price.
> >
> >My responses are free... and priceless.
>
> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
> undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
> You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
> it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
> answering.
>
> It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
>
> You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
> me to advice you over usenet.
>
> Good Luck!
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:36:39 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:25 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>>
>>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>>
>>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>>
>>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>>
>>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>>> do get confused easily.
>>>>
>>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>>
>>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>>
>>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>>
>>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>>> continue to assist you.
>>>
>>> Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>>> clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>>> button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>>> generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>>> follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>>> group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>>> the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>>> immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>>> being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>>> is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>>> usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>>>
>>>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>>>
>>> While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>>> case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>>>
>>>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>>>
>>>> No thank you.
>>>
>>> Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>>> question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>>>
>>>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>>>> educate
>>>> you.
>>>
>>> Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>>> you have gotten confused.
>>>>
>>>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>>>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>>>
>>> My responses are free... and priceless.
>>
>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought.
>
>Where do you disagree with me? I am fine if you do, though I find it quite
>telling that you voice your disagreement so rudely and while I you claim I
>am "clueless" you point to not a single error in my claims.
>
>> You haven't undestood one single piece of my postings!
>
>I understood your question: You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
I give up! I forgot there are such things as Asberger syndrom. I
realise that now. If you can't read and understand what's behind the
actual word... well then you can't. Sorry for making you reveal
yourself. This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
killfile so I don't make the same mistake again. Sorry
>I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
>have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
>you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
>not mine.
>
><snip />
>
>
>
>--
>Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
>
> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
> >> wildly!!
> >>
> >>Thank you for the support!
> >
> >So why do you do it?
>
> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
> will.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:24 -0700, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>
wrote:
>In article <4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>> >"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> >4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>> >
>> >>> Well, back to the topic:
>> >>>
>> >>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>> >>
>> >> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>> >
>> >Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>> >do get confused easily.
>> >>
>> >>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>> >>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>> >>
>> >> Well , you thought you answered.
>> >
>> >Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>> >you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>> >
>> >Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>> >other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>> >continue to assist you.
>> >
>> >Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>> >clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>> >button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>> >generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>> >follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>> >group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>> >the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>> >immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>> >being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>> >is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>> >usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>> >
>> >> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>> >
>> >While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>> >case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>> >
>> >>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>> >>
>> >> No thank you.
>> >
>> >Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>> >question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>> >
>> >> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>> >> educate
>> >> you.
>> >
>> >Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>> >you have gotten confused.
>> >>
>> >> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>> >> a success, they have to lower the price.
>> >
>> >My responses are free... and priceless.
>>
>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
>> undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
>> You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
>> it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
>> answering.
>>
>> It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
>>
>> You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
>> me to advice you over usenet.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....5b8c8befc960b2
>?dmode=source
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:51:10 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>In article <4764e483.4144687@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
>> >> wildly!!
>> >>
>> >>Thank you for the support!
>> >
>> >So why do you do it?
>>
>> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
>> will.
>
>That was way too easy.
I'm glad you find something easy! There is hope for you, after all.
>
>--
>Sandman[.net]
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:24 -0700, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>
wrote:
>In article <4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>> >"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> >4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>> >
>> >>> Well, back to the topic:
>> >>>
>> >>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>> >>
>> >> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>> >
>> >Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>> >do get confused easily.
>> >>
>> >>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>> >>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>> >>
>> >> Well , you thought you answered.
>> >
>> >Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>> >you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>> >
>> >Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>> >other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>> >continue to assist you.
>> >
>> >Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>> >clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>> >button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>> >generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>> >follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>> >group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>> >the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>> >immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>> >being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>> >is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>> >usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>> >
>> >> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>> >
>> >While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>> >case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>> >
>> >>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>> >>
>> >> No thank you.
>> >
>> >Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>> >question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>> >
>> >> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>> >> educate
>> >> you.
>> >
>> >Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>> >you have gotten confused.
>> >>
>> >> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>> >> a success, they have to lower the price.
>> >
>> >My responses are free... and priceless.
>>
>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
>> undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
>> You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
>> it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
>> answering.
>>
>> It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
>>
>> You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
>> me to advice you over usenet.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....5b8c8befc960b2
>?dmode=source
> >> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
> >> >> wildly!!
> >> >>
> >> >>Thank you for the support!
> >> >
> >> >So why do you do it?
> >>
> >> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
> >> will.
> >
> >That was way too easy.
>
> I'm glad you find something easy! There is hope for you, after all.
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:36:39 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> 4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:25 PM:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>>>
>>>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>>>
>>>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>>>> do get confused easily.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>>>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>>>
>>>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>>>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>>>> continue to assist you.
>>>>
>>>> Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>>>> clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>>>> button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>>>> generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>>>> follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>>>> group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>>>> the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>>>> immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>>>> being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but
>>>> it
>>>> is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>>>> usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>>>>
>>>>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>>>>
>>>> While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>>>> case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>>>>
>>>>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>>>>
>>>>> No thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>>>> question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>>>>
>>>>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>>>>> educate
>>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered.
>>>> Clearly
>>>> you have gotten confused.
>>>>>
>>>>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>>>>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>>>>
>>>> My responses are free... and priceless.
>>>
>>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought.
>>
>> Where do you disagree with me? I am fine if you do, though I find it quite
>> telling that you voice your disagreement so rudely and while I you claim I
>> am "clueless" you point to not a single error in my claims.
>>
>>> You haven't undestood one single piece of my postings!
>>
>> I understood your question: You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>
> I give up! I forgot there are such things as Asberger syndrom. I
> realise that now. If you can't read and understand what's behind the
> actual word... well then you can't. Sorry for making you reveal
> yourself. This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
> killfile so I don't make the same mistake again. Sorry
>
>> I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
>> have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
>> you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
>> not mine.
>>
>> <snip />
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>> conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
>>
>
I forgive you.
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:15:07 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>4765e81c.5066234@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:48 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:36:39 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>> 4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:25 PM:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>>>>> do get confused easily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>>>>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>>>>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>>>>> continue to assist you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a
Re: Join the Wireless Phone Revolution for $10! 