Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > US Networks > alt.cellular.attws
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008, 02:55 PM
fvefeveif@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default M-I,5`Per secution ` my re sponse to th e harassment

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my response. to the harassment -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction. in 1990/91 was to assume that if I broke contact then
they would not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I. did the
things that. have been suggested by other people; I sold my television,
stopped. listening to the radio and tried to withdraw away from the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must have. more important
things to deal with and that normal people. would simply leave me alone if
it were. made difficult for them to continue their harassment.

I reckoned without the. sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to. do
their. dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to believe what
he. was being told, and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of
practical assistance. It was not until three years had. passed that the GP
admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts. from a
private detective agency to sweep our. house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted a thorough search and found. nothing; but as noted
above, since. the existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by
the harassers, you would expect them to. have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance sweep. into account when planning the type of devices
to. be employed.

In Easter 1995 I. made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but
the police have not expressed any intention to do anything about. the
continuing harassment ("we're. not saying it's happening and we're not
saying it isn't happening" were. the words used). I think the officer I
spoke to. at Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although other members of
the police force obviously. do know.

From April 1995 until the present time the. matter has been discussed in a
lot. of detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
has given birth to the. article which you are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet. were that wider publicizing would discourage the security
services from continuing their harassment, and "draw. people out" into
concurring with the truth of. what was being said. Neither of those have
followed, but the discussion has served. a purpose in allowing this
structured report to. be created.

9250


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M-I,5`Per secution - Harassment th rough the Rad io vifmi@hotmail.com alt.computer.security 0 12-31-2007 09:07 AM
M-I 5-Per secution - M I5 Hav e Syst ematically Destroyed My Li fe emeim@hotmail.com alt.internet.wireless 0 12-31-2007 08:23 AM
M-I 5`Per secution . BB C Ne wscasters L ie & D eny They re Wat ching Me evmifmf@lycos.com alt.cellular.verizon 0 12-26-2007 08:12 AM
MI5-Persecution: Harassment through the Radio (33006) MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk alt.internet.wireless 0 12-16-2007 05:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45