On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:27:33 -0600, Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com>
wrote:
>he's the guy that was able to reduce the chip count to such extreme
>levels to make all PCs finally possible.
>
>http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_what_...ed_and_by_whom
>
>engineers still study and marvel at Woz's designs, he one of the true
>geniuses of our age. he did what nobody else could do before... make the
>first PC for the masses.
Did you even bother to read the article you referenced?
From it:
"The first such desktop-size system specifically designed for personal
use appeared in 1974; it was offered by Micro Instrumentation
Telemetry Systems (MITS). The owners of the system were then
encouraged by the editor of a popular technology magazine to create
and sell a mail-order computer kit through the magazine. The computer,
which was called Altair, retailed for slightly less than $400. The
demand for the microcomputer kit was immediate, unexpected, and
totally overwhelming."
> >http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_what_...ed_and_by_whom
> >
> >engineers still study and marvel at Woz's designs, he one of the true
> >geniuses of our age. he did what nobody else could do before... make the
> >first PC for the masses.
>
> Did you even bother to read the article you referenced?
>
> From it:
>
> "The first such desktop-size system specifically designed for personal
> use appeared in 1974; it was offered by Micro Instrumentation
> Telemetry Systems (MITS). The owners of the system were then
> encouraged by the editor of a popular technology magazine to create
> and sell a mail-order computer kit through the magazine. The computer,
> which was called Altair, retailed for slightly less than $400. The
> demand for the microcomputer kit was immediate, unexpected, and
> totally overwhelming."
>
> 1974 came before 1976, you retarded pig fucker.
but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
do.
keep trying though, we are all having fun laughing at you
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:19 -0600, Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com>
wrote:
>Oxtard <Oxtard@the.apple.brown.noser> wrote:
>
>> >http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_what_...ed_and_by_whom
>> >
>> >engineers still study and marvel at Woz's designs, he one of the true
>> >geniuses of our age. he did what nobody else could do before... make the
>> >first PC for the masses.
>>
>> Did you even bother to read the article you referenced?
>>
>> From it:
>>
>> "The first such desktop-size system specifically designed for personal
>> use appeared in 1974; it was offered by Micro Instrumentation
>> Telemetry Systems (MITS). The owners of the system were then
>> encouraged by the editor of a popular technology magazine to create
>> and sell a mail-order computer kit through the magazine. The computer,
>> which was called Altair, retailed for slightly less than $400. The
>> demand for the microcomputer kit was immediate, unexpected, and
>> totally overwhelming."
>>
>> 1974 came before 1976, you retarded pig fucker.
>
>but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
>sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
>do.
Yeah, keep up the spin, douchebag. Every time someone points out one
of your lies, you back peddle and change the context, pig fucker.
>keep trying though, we are all having fun laughing at you
I doubt anyone here gives two shits about all the nonsense you spew.
The only ones I see posting in support of your views is your own sock
puppet nyms, pig fucker.
And did I mention, you're a pig fucker, pig fucker.
> Oxtard <Oxtard@the.apple.brown.noser> wrote:
>
>
>>>http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_what_...ed_and_by_whom
>>>
>>>engineers still study and marvel at Woz's designs, he one of the true
>>>geniuses of our age. he did what nobody else could do before... make the
>>>first PC for the masses.
>>
>>Did you even bother to read the article you referenced?
>>
>>From it:
>>
>>"The first such desktop-size system specifically designed for personal
>>use appeared in 1974; it was offered by Micro Instrumentation
>>Telemetry Systems (MITS). The owners of the system were then
>>encouraged by the editor of a popular technology magazine to create
>>and sell a mail-order computer kit through the magazine. The computer,
>>which was called Altair, retailed for slightly less than $400. The
>>demand for the microcomputer kit was immediate, unexpected, and
>>totally overwhelming."
>>
>>1974 came before 1976, you retarded pig fucker.
>
>
> but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
> sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
> do.
Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro. Check
your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
>
> keep trying though, we are all having fun laughing at you
And I'm having fun pointing out how wet behind the ears you are too.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> > but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
> > sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
> > do.
>
> Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro. Check
> your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
too bad it never sold more than a handful. come on Maverick, step it up
a notch, you need to at least try.
Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com> wrote in
news:colalovesmacs-EBA33D.23193726102007@mpls-nnrp-02.inet.qwest.net:
> Maverick <Sun@ranch.org> wrote:
>
>> > but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and
>> > was sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was
>> > first to do.
>>
>> Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro.
>> Check your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
>
> too bad it never sold more than a handful. come on Maverick, step it
> up a notch, you need to at least try.
>
So you agree that it was first, Oxford? Nowhere were numbers sold a
criteria of this discussion. Gee- that makes you look awful stupid.
> Maverick <Sun@ranch.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
>>>sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
>>>do.
>>
>>Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro. Check
>>your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
>
>
> too bad it never sold more than a handful. come on Maverick, step it up
> a notch, you need to at least try.
You don't even know who processor tech was then. They were the first...
but overpriced and not that reliable. Bad management there. But they
were the first integrated unit... and if you look closely, the Apple II
was essentially a knock-off of the Sol. The Sol at least had a full
keyboard.
"Maverick" <Sun@ranch.org> wrote in message
news:i4edna49ke_6z7janZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@bresnan.com. ..
> Oxford wrote:
>
>> Maverick <Sun@ranch.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
>>>>sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
>>>>do.
>>>
>>>Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro. Check
>>>your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
>>
>>
>> too bad it never sold more than a handful. come on Maverick, step it up a
>> notch, you need to at least try.
>
> You don't even know who processor tech was then. They were the first...
> but overpriced and not that reliable. Bad management there. But they were
> the first integrated unit... and if you look closely, the Apple II was
> essentially a knock-off of the Sol. The Sol at least had a full keyboard.
Debating w Oxford is like trying to explain calculus to a duck.
> "Maverick" <Sun@ranch.org> wrote in message
> news:i4edna49ke_6z7janZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@bresnan.com. ..
>
>>Oxford wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maverick <Sun@ranch.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>but the machine in 1974 wasn't considered a personal computer. and was
>>>>>sold as a "kit", not a compete machine in a box like apple was first to
>>>>>do.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong again. The Sol-20 was the first complete integrated micro. Check
>>>>your history. It was sold as both kit and built.
>>>
>>>
>>>too bad it never sold more than a handful. come on Maverick, step it up a
>>>notch, you need to at least try.
>>
>>You don't even know who processor tech was then. They were the first...
>>but overpriced and not that reliable. Bad management there. But they were
>>the first integrated unit... and if you look closely, the Apple II was
>>essentially a knock-off of the Sol. The Sol at least had a full keyboard.
>
>
> Debating w Oxford is like trying to explain calculus to a duck.
>
> "Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Debating w Oxford is like trying to explain calculus to a duck.
>
>
> so you believe that ducks are geniuses?
>
> whatever Thurman...
>
> at least i'm not using Windows, the true mark of a poor education.
I find it a lot easier to use OS X on a G5. But if you want a real
secure operating system for use in business critical data, use OpenVMS.
You'll find OpenVMS on HPs website... deep in the business computing
section or just poke in OpenVMS in their search box.
But they are rather expensive.
> In article <geSdnQhGhLottbvanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@bresnan.com>, Maverick
> <Sun@ranch.org> wrote:
>
>
>>It is difficult to herd ducks. :-))
>
>
> <open hick.lang>
> Whaddaya mean?
> I herda ducks!
> I here ducks alla time!
> You ain't herda ducks?
Re: iPhone bricks - more info 
Linear Mode
