Re: iPhone users all orgasm simultaneously--can now send pictures from their phones!!! OMG!!!!

permalink · #1 (**permalink**) 09-20-2009, 03:02 AM

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

> http://consumerist.com/5358089/mms-f...s-2-weeks-earl
> y

we could always send photos from our iphones, just not through mms, yawn.

permalink · #2 (**permalink**) 09-20-2009, 06:29 AM

At 19 Sep 2009 21:02:05 -0600 David Moyer wrote:
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>
> > http://consumerist.com/5358089/mms-f...egins-2-weeks-
earl
> > y
>
> we could always send photos from our iphones, just not through mms, yawn.

Nor could you easily _receive_ them via MMS, either.

permalink · #3 (**permalink**) 09-21-2009, 01:29 PM

Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:

> > we could always send photos from our iphones, just not through mms, yawn.
>
> Nor could you easily _receive_ them via MMS, either.

nobody cares, mms is obsolete.

permalink · #4 (**permalink**) 09-21-2009, 03:04 PM

At 21 Sep 2009 07:29:49 -0600 David Moyer wrote:
> Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:
>
> > > we could always send photos from our iphones, just not through mms,
yawn.
> >
> > Nor could you easily _receive_ them via MMS, either.
>
> nobody cares, mms is obsolete.

Oh yeah, sorry. So's multitasking, apparently...

permalink · #5 (**permalink**) 09-21-2009, 04:55 PM

In message <Idktm.16719$j34.13136@newsfe01.iad> Todd Allcock
<elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> was claimed to have wrote:

>At 19 Sep 2009 21:02:05 -0600 David Moyer wrote:
>> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>>
>> > http://consumerist.com/5358089/mms-f...egins-2-weeks-
>earl
>> > y
>>
>> we could always send photos from our iphones, just not through mms, yawn.
>
>
>Nor could you easily _receive_ them via MMS, either.

That depends on how you define "easily", Rogers had a clunky web based
workaround that was moderately functional even before iPhones had native
MMS.