AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency

On Jun 28, 6:26 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> > Such things are fairly important. For example, did you ever notice
> > that Roman Numerals do not have a zero or a null? There was a half
> > hearted attempt at inventing zero or null (nulla), but fortunately
> > that failed for many centuries. Rome survived much decadence and some
> > really weird Emperors without much difficulty.
>
> There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's
> simply not rue.
>
> mike

On Jun 28, 2:21 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Don Bowey wrote:
> > They don't know how to tie strings together?
>
> When some of them have only one end, it becomes bothersome. thankfully
> my shoelaces were spared this metaphysical ambiguity.
>
> mike

Radium wrote:
> Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a
> frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles
> every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and
> an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
> frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
> nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
> eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
> power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
> power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?

No.

> If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.

No.

--
We can't possibly imprison 300 million Americans for not paying their
taxes, so let's grant all of them amnesty NOW!

On Jun 29, 11:03 am, clifto <cli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Radium wrote:
> > Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a
> > frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles
> > every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and
> > an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
> > frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
> > nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
> > eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
> > power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
> > power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?
>
> No.
>
> > If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.
>
> No.
>
> --
> We can't possibly imprison 300 million Americans for not paying their
> taxes, so let's grant all of them amnesty NOW!

m II wrote:
> There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's
> simply not rue.

Correct...the fiddle wasn't invented for another thousand years.

[quote Wiki]

It was said by Suetonius and Cassius Dio that Nero sang the "Sack of Ilium"
in stage costume while the city burned. However, Tacitus' account has Nero
in Antium at the time of the fire. Tacitus said that Nero playing his lyre
and singing while the city burned was only rumor. Popular legend remembers
Nero fiddling-- that is, playing the fiddle-- while Rome burned, but this
is an anachronism as the instrument had not yet been invented, and would
not be for over 1,000 years.

On Jun 30, 12:33 pm, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob> wrote:
> m II wrote:
> > There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's
> > simply not rue.
>
> Correct...the fiddle wasn't invented for another thousand years.
>
> [quote Wiki]
>
> It was said by Suetonius and Cassius Dio that Nero sang the "Sack of Ilium"
> in stage costume while the city burned. However, Tacitus' account has Nero
> in Antium at the time of the fire. Tacitus said that Nero playing his lyre
> and singing while the city burned was only rumor. Popular legend remembers
> Nero fiddling-- that is, playing the fiddle-- while Rome burned, but this
> is an anachronism as the instrument had not yet been invented, and would
> not be for over 1,000 years.

On Jun 30, 1:43 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 12:33 pm, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob> wrote:
>
> > m II wrote:
> > > There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's
> > > simply not rue.
>
> > Correct...the fiddle wasn't invented for another thousand years.
>
> > [quote Wiki]
>
> > It was said by Suetonius and Cassius Dio that Nero sang the "Sack of Ilium"
> > in stage costume while the city burned. However, Tacitus' account has Nero
> > in Antium at the time of the fire. Tacitus said that Nero playing his lyre
> > and singing while the city burned was only rumor. Popular legend remembers
> > Nero fiddling-- that is, playing the fiddle-- while Rome burned, but this
> > is an anachronism as the instrument had not yet been invented, and would
> > not be for over 1,000 years.
>
> .


Typical response from RHF...Nada... Were you abused as a child?
Maybe you and Teleprobe should go lap link each other and maybe
something with readable content will come out..
RHF...The censor of the shortwave group.. What an anally oriented putz
you
are... If I ever end up like you, I hope someone bitch slaps me into
the next
century...
MK