On Jun 25, 12:37 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
> zeez <Ultim...@excite.com> wrote
>
> > Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
> >> Geoff Miller <geo...@lava.net> wrote
> >>> Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast.net> writes
> >>>> Buying a device like that is an example of what's
> >>>> known in military aviation circles as "bad headwork."
> >>>> If this is the same military who's doing such a lousy job in Iraq,
> >>>> I am not all that concerned with their opinion on handheld devices.
> >>> It isn't an opinion on handheld devices, you comprehension-deprived
> >>> little leftist nitwit. It's a figure of speech.
> >>> If you believe the military is doing a lousy job in Iraq, then
> >>> perhaps you, a noted expert on military strategy and tactics, would
> >>> be willing to edify the rest of us by offering some suggestions?
> >> Let the stupid ragheads fight it out amoungst themselves.
> > I don't like the fact that we are in Iraq to begin with
>
> Sure, but its a bit late for that now.
Probaly because Fuhrer Bu$h keeps rejecting anything that has to do
with a pull out
date, to the point of vetoing a bill that would help save troops
lives.
"Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by
western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA
and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation
of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the
computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and
trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.[43]"
Heh, the good ol' CIA. The same CIA that flooded South Central Los
Angeles with drugs. Why am I not
suprised?
> > Again, why are we involved there?
>
> The stupid idea that getting rid of Saddam would see the stupid raghead
> welcome that and get their act into gear after that. In practice the stupid
> ragheads are so stupid that they just looted everything in sight as soon as
> they could and then proceeded to kill each other very enthusiastically indeed.
>
Bu$h fucked up big time. I think the real reason he went into Iraq
was not because of 9/11, but to
get revenge on Saddam when Saddam tried to off his father.
> Hell of a contrast to what the japs and the krauts
> managed when their arseholes were disposed of.
>
> Corse you can also claim that those country were fucked over much
> more comprehensivey and so even the stupidest should have been
> able to work out that they had better get their act into gear.
>
> > So far the WMDs haven't been found yet.
>
> That was always just an excuse, stupid.
>
> Just like the lie about the attack on the navy was with Vietnam.
>
Yep. Same old shit, different asshole in charge.
> >> They just aint worth first world country kid's lives.
> >> Even the stupid japs and krauts had enough of a clue to get
> >> on with it once they had lost. Not the stupid ragheads tho.
> >> Its possible that it might be possible to prevail after
> >> 40 years or so given that even the stupid irish
> > The Irish got fucked over pretty badly when they first step foot on this land.
>
> Nothing like what happened back in Ireland.
>
Many Irishmen went straight to the frontlines in the Civil War.
> >> managed to come to their senses eventually but its
> >> doubtful that the stupid ragheads can even manage that.
> > Hitler is smiling at your racism :\
>
> Nope, he's been dead for quite a while now, stupid.
On Jun 26, 12:13 am, "bepp...@gmail.com" <bepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm with you. I had the original smartphone (QCP-6250) back in '02,
> and I loved it! Got myself a Treo 650, and had it until February, when
> it finally crapped out. The insurance company sent me a 700, and I
> can't live without it! I just hope DHL isn't sending yours, 'cause it
> took them 2 weeks to get it to me. Worth the wait, though!
I';ve been salivating at the thought of getting a Treo for some time
now (and a Windows mobile one at that,
because of application support. Yes, I'm no fan of M$ but still....)
zeez <UltimaUW@excite.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
>> zeez <Ultim...@excite.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Geoff Miller <geo...@lava.net> wrote
>>>>> Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast.net> writes
>>>>>> Buying a device like that is an example of what's
>>>>>> known in military aviation circles as "bad headwork."
>>>>>> If this is the same military who's doing such a lousy job in Iraq,
>>>>>> I am not all that concerned with their opinion on handheld devices.
>>>>> It isn't an opinion on handheld devices, you comprehension-deprived
>>>>> little leftist nitwit. It's a figure of speech.
>>>>> If you believe the military is doing a lousy job in Iraq, then
>>>>> perhaps you, a noted expert on military strategy and tactics,
>>>>> would be willing to edify the rest of us by offering some suggestions?
>>>> Let the stupid ragheads fight it out amoungst themselves.
>>> I don't like the fact that we are in Iraq to begin with
>> Sure, but its a bit late for that now.
> Probaly because Fuhrer Bu$h
You wouldnt know what a real fuhrer was if one bit you on the lard arse, child.
> keeps rejecting anything that has to do with a pull out date,
Only a fool would give those stupid ragheads a pullout date, child.
You fools qualify.
> to the point of vetoing a bill that would help save troops lives.
> was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were
> recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.[43]"
Pig ignorant lie.
> Heh, the good ol' CIA. The same CIA that
> flooded South Central Los Angeles with drugs.
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
> Why am I not suprised?
Because you're a sucker for that sort of pig ignorant shit, fuckwit child.
>>> Again, why are we involved there?
>> The stupid idea that getting rid of Saddam would see the stupid
>> raghead welcome that and get their act into gear after that. In
>> practice the stupid ragheads are so stupid that they just looted
>> everything in sight as soon as they could and then proceeded to kill
>> each other very enthusiastically indeed.
> Bu$h fucked up big time.
Yes, but even JFK did that.
> I think the real reason he went into Iraq was not because of 9/11,
> but to get revenge on Saddam when Saddam tried to off his father.
More fool you. Have fun explaining why he fucked over Afghanistan too.
>> Hell of a contrast to what the japs and the krauts
>> managed when their arseholes were disposed of.
>> Corse you can also claim that those country were fucked over much
>> more comprehensivey and so even the stupidest should have been
>> able to work out that they had better get their act into gear.
>>> So far the WMDs haven't been found yet.
>> That was always just an excuse, stupid.
>> Just like the lie about the attack on the navy was with Vietnam.
> Yep. Same old shit, different asshole in charge.
No one is ever stupid enough to put fools like you in change of anything, child.
>>>> They just aint worth first world country kid's lives.
>>>> Even the stupid japs and krauts had enough of a clue to get
>>>> on with it once they had lost. Not the stupid ragheads tho.
>>>> Its possible that it might be possible to prevail after
>>>> 40 years or so given that even the stupid irish
>>> The Irish got fucked over pretty badly when they first step foot on this land.
>> Nothing like what happened back in Ireland.
> Many Irishmen went straight to the frontlines in the Civil War.
Yep, it was that or starve, child.
>>>> managed to come to their senses eventually but its
>>>> doubtful that the stupid ragheads can even manage that.
>>> Hitler is smiling at your racism :\
>> Nope, he's been dead for quite a while now, stupid.
> Noooooo, ya think?
Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought, fuckwit child.
On Jun 26, 2:54 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Nope, he's been dead for quite a while now, stupid.
> > Noooooo, ya think?
>
> Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought, fuckwit child.
Blah blah blah blah...whatever. Atleast, I don't have to resort to
calling Arabs "ragheads".
In article <1182850319.019693.156680@i38g2000prf.googlegroups .com>,
zeez <UltimaUW@excite.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 12:13 am, "bepp...@gmail.com" <bepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm with you. I had the original smartphone (QCP-6250) back in '02,
> > and I loved it! Got myself a Treo 650, and had it until February, when
> > it finally crapped out. The insurance company sent me a 700, and I
> > can't live without it! I just hope DHL isn't sending yours, 'cause it
> > took them 2 weeks to get it to me. Worth the wait, though!
>
>
>
> I';ve been salivating at the thought of getting a Treo for some time
> now (and a Windows mobile one at that,
> because of application support. Yes, I'm no fan of M$ but still....)
I've had a Treo for 2 years and I'm not salivating. It's not bad, but
still not easy to use.
Re: The great iPhone hunt of 2007 
Linear Mode
