Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > US Networks > alt.cellular.cingular
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 08:25 AM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Phone insurance

There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list of
eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I find
this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week but none
are covered under insurance ... go figure!



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 06:09 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:25:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
>purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
>that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list of
>eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I find
>this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week but none
>are covered under insurance ... go figure!


Probably because the actuarial basis isn't there at a sensible price.
Consider getting your own insurance.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 08:00 PM
PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

First those insurance phones are bunch of craps. If you loose or damage your
phone you should pay a $50.00 copay, then you get mostly an inferior and
refurbished phones.

Srcond they do not offer insurance on brand new technology phne, because
there are no refurbished phones avilable on the market yet, to replace your
brand new phones.


"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
> purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
> that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
> of eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
> find this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week
> but none are covered under insurance ... go figure!
>




Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 08:01 PM
PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

First those insurance phones are bunch of craps. If you loose or damage your
phone you should pay a $50.00 copay, then you get mostly an inferior and
refurbished phones.

Srcond they do not offer insurance on brand new technology phne, because
there are no refurbished phones avilable on the market yet, to replace your
brand new phones.


"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
> purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
> that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
> of eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
> find this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week
> but none are covered under insurance ... go figure!
>





Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:20 PM
Thurman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance


"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
> purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
> that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
> of eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
> find this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week
> but none are covered under insurance ... go figure!


When I bought a RAZR 14 months ago, insurance was not available. Yesterday
the 8525 wasn't available.

I'll add it to my State Farm personal electronics policy but that won't
cover failure.



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 02:16 AM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:20:40 -0600, "Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com>
wrote in <0SO7h.83$_n1.32@newsfe04.lga>:

>"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
>news:NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.c om...
>> There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
>> purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
>> that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
>> of eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
>> find this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week
>> but none are covered under insurance ... go figure!

>
>When I bought a RAZR 14 months ago, insurance was not available. Yesterday
>the 8525 wasn't available.
>
>I'll add it to my State Farm personal electronics policy but that won't
>cover failure.


That's of course what the warranty is for.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 03:08 AM
Fred
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

As a general rule Cingular will not insure anything that takes an expansion
memory card.

Fred

"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
> purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
> that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
> of eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
> find this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week
> but none are covered under insurance ... go figure!
>




Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 03:29 AM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

I would like my insurance from my phone carrier ... it seems to make more
sense. I don't think Farm Bureau would insure a damaged or lost phone which
is what the traditional cell phone coverage is for.


"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:s4hul2p1eiri7k21a5a84nt6bj2ba3f3pd@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:25:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
> in <NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.com> :
>
>>There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
>>purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
>>that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
>>of
>>eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I find
>>this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week but
>>none
>>are covered under insurance ... go figure!

>
> Probably because the actuarial basis isn't there at a sensible price.
> Consider getting your own insurance.
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>




Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 03:55 AM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:29:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <h9CdnaL3k9T6UsLYnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>I would like my insurance from my phone carrier ... it seems to make more
>sense.


Not necessarily -- Google "cell-phone-insurance" and read the horror
stories.

>I don't think Farm Bureau would insure a damaged or lost phone which
>is what the traditional cell phone coverage is for.


You might want to check -- my own carrier will insure pretty much
anything.

p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread
-- it's confusing. Thanks.

>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:s4hul2p1eiri7k21a5a84nt6bj2ba3f3pd@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:25:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
>> in <NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.com> :
>>
>>>There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I just
>>>purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the store
>>>that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
>>>of
>>>eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I find
>>>this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week but
>>>none
>>>are covered under insurance ... go figure!

>>
>> Probably because the actuarial basis isn't there at a sensible price.
>> Consider getting your own insurance.


--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 01:39 PM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting wrong.
It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to find
the most recent.

As always I'm sure you have a contradicting opinion as this forum keeps a
want-to-be dictator always looking to spread "the Navas way".


"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:e9lvl253540jcl5ipparqvrqb2btdgtnu1@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:29:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
> in <h9CdnaL3k9T6UsLYnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@insightbb.com> :
>
>>I would like my insurance from my phone carrier ... it seems to make more
>>sense.

>
> Not necessarily -- Google "cell-phone-insurance" and read the horror
> stories.
>
>>I don't think Farm Bureau would insure a damaged or lost phone which
>>is what the traditional cell phone coverage is for.

>
> You might want to check -- my own carrier will insure pretty much
> anything.
>
> p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread
> -- it's confusing. Thanks.
>
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>news:s4hul2p1eiri7k21a5a84nt6bj2ba3f3pd@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:25:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
>>> in <NOOdnRW3f_fXXsPYnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@insightbb.com> :
>>>
>>>>There appears to be no phone insurance for PDA's and music phones. I
>>>>just
>>>>purchased a SYNC (Samsung A707) for my daughter and was told in the
>>>>store
>>>>that it wasn't insurance eligible. I went online and looked at the list
>>>>of
>>>>eligible phones and they have excluded all PDA's and music phones. I
>>>>find
>>>>this odd that Cingular just introduced the new 3G phones this week but
>>>>none
>>>>are covered under insurance ... go figure!
>>>
>>> Probably because the actuarial basis isn't there at a sensible price.
>>> Consider getting your own insurance.

>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>




Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 03:48 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:39:26 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <dsudncHAz6sYw_3YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting wrong.
>It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to find
>the most recent.
>
>As always I'm sure you have a contradicting opinion as this forum keeps a
>want-to-be dictator always looking to spread "the Navas way".


Does being rude to someone trying to help come naturally, or do you have
to work at it?

The reasons for bottom posting are explained in Q7 of "Quoting Style in
Newsgroup Postings" <http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html>
(published by the news.newusers.questions Moderation Board).

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 03:51 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:55:07 GMT, John Navas
<spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in
<e9lvl253540jcl5ipparqvrqb2btdgtnu1@4ax.com>:

>On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:29:16 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
>in <h9CdnaL3k9T6UsLYnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@insightbb.com> :


>>I don't think Farm Bureau would insure a damaged or lost phone which
>>is what the traditional cell phone coverage is for.

>
>You might want to check -- my own carrier will insure pretty much
>anything.


To be clear, "carrier" there is a reference to insurance carrier, not
Cingular.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 04:05 PM
Jud Hardcastle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

In article <dsudncHAz6sYw_3YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@insightbb.com> ,
someone@microsoft.com says...
> John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting wrong.
> It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to find
> the most recent.
>

Perhaps but bottom posting is more accepted since it allows one to
insert a reply immediately after a quoted comment (without having to
paraphrase the comment in your own answer). And it's much easier to
reply to multiple comments down the thread--it's more like an in-person
conversation. Top posting is frowned upon in every group I frequent and
mixing both types in one thread WILL invariably get you flamed.

As for "going to the bottom of a thread" if posters quote just enough to
indicate what they are replying to (versus the ENTIRE thread) then you
wouldn't have to "go" very far down.
--
Jud
Dallas TX USA

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:59 PM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

Again ... it's a personal preference.

I'm a top poster.

"Jud Hardcastle" <I5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fca3cdaa160574c9899a0@news.dallas.sbcglo bal.net...
> In article <dsudncHAz6sYw_3YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@insightbb.com> ,
> someone@microsoft.com says...
>> John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting
>> wrong.
>> It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to
>> find
>> the most recent.
>>

> Perhaps but bottom posting is more accepted since it allows one to
> insert a reply immediately after a quoted comment (without having to
> paraphrase the comment in your own answer). And it's much easier to
> reply to multiple comments down the thread--it's more like an in-person
> conversation. Top posting is frowned upon in every group I frequent and
> mixing both types in one thread WILL invariably get you flamed.
>
> As for "going to the bottom of a thread" if posters quote just enough to
> indicate what they are replying to (versus the ENTIRE thread) then you
> wouldn't have to "go" very far down.
> --
> Jud
> Dallas TX USA




Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 01:53 PM
Thurman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance


"Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FcudnS1qdboJWP3YnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> Again ... it's a personal preference.
>
> I'm a top poster.


And some of us in this newsgroup that provide solutions for cellular issues
as a profession, choose not to reply to top posters. It's also a personal
preference.

(Got my 8525 last Friday: the bar is raised for high tech in a package the
size of a deck of cards).



Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 07:54 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:59:12 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <FcudnS1qdboJWP3YnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>Again ... it's a personal preference.
>
>I'm a top poster.


Your choice, but still rude to switch posting styles in mid-thread.

>"Jud Hardcastle" <I5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1fca3cdaa160574c9899a0@news.dallas.sbcgl obal.net...
>> In article <dsudncHAz6sYw_3YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@insightbb.com> ,
>> someone@microsoft.com says...
>>> John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting
>>> wrong.
>>> It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to
>>> find
>>> the most recent.
>>>

>> Perhaps but bottom posting is more accepted since it allows one to
>> insert a reply immediately after a quoted comment (without having to
>> paraphrase the comment in your own answer). And it's much easier to
>> reply to multiple comments down the thread--it's more like an in-person
>> conversation. Top posting is frowned upon in every group I frequent and
>> mixing both types in one thread WILL invariably get you flamed.
>>
>> As for "going to the bottom of a thread" if posters quote just enough to
>> indicate what they are replying to (versus the ENTIRE thread) then you
>> wouldn't have to "go" very far down.
>> --
>> Jud
>> Dallas TX USA

>


--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 11:49 PM
El Jefe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

So who cares ?
"Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com> wrote in message
news:9ri8h.9$vQ.6@newsfe03.lga...
>
> "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FcudnS1qdboJWP3YnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
>> Again ... it's a personal preference.
>>
>> I'm a top poster.

>
> And some of us in this newsgroup that provide solutions for cellular
> issues as a profession, choose not to reply to top posters. It's also a
> personal preference.
>
> (Got my 8525 last Friday: the bar is raised for high tech in a package the
> size of a deck of cards).
>
>




Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006, 01:12 AM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

Obviously you are not one of those because you responded.

As I look through the threads today there are other top posters who don't
get berated. It must be my lucky day to attract the experts.

If you don't like top posting then please don't bother responding to my
posts.

"Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com> wrote in message
news:9ri8h.9$vQ.6@newsfe03.lga...
>
> "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FcudnS1qdboJWP3YnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
>> Again ... it's a personal preference.
>>
>> I'm a top poster.

>
> And some of us in this newsgroup that provide solutions for cellular
> issues as a profession, choose not to reply to top posters. It's also a
> personal preference.
>
> (Got my 8525 last Friday: the bar is raised for high tech in a package the
> size of a deck of cards).
>
>




Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006, 01:13 AM
Ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

Thanks God.

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:2u14m2t68vdvugcnkqvlid93jr8frl66f9@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:59:12 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
> in <FcudnS1qdboJWP3YnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@insightbb.com> :
>
>>Again ... it's a personal preference.
>>
>>I'm a top poster.

>
> Your choice, but still rude to switch posting styles in mid-thread.
>
>>"Jud Hardcastle" <I5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1fca3cdaa160574c9899a0@news.dallas.sbcg lobal.net...
>>> In article <dsudncHAz6sYw_3YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@insightbb.com> ,
>>> someone@microsoft.com says...
>>>> John ... I always post to the top so in my thoughts YOU are posting
>>>> wrong.
>>>> It doesn't make sense to me to have to go to the bottom of a thread to
>>>> find
>>>> the most recent.
>>>>
>>> Perhaps but bottom posting is more accepted since it allows one to
>>> insert a reply immediately after a quoted comment (without having to
>>> paraphrase the comment in your own answer). And it's much easier to
>>> reply to multiple comments down the thread--it's more like an in-person
>>> conversation. Top posting is frowned upon in every group I frequent and
>>> mixing both types in one thread WILL invariably get you flamed.
>>>
>>> As for "going to the bottom of a thread" if posters quote just enough to
>>> indicate what they are replying to (versus the ENTIRE thread) then you
>>> wouldn't have to "go" very far down.
>>> --
>>> Jud
>>> Dallas TX USA

>>

>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>




Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006, 01:20 AM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:12:49 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <w7SdnfzJbPMcz__YnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>If you don't like top posting then please don't bother responding to my
>posts.


I'll do my best to remember that -- I prefer not to waste my time on
self-centered people.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006, 01:20 AM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phone insurance

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:13:20 -0500, "Ann" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote
in <O5OdnSAIprsCz__YnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@insightbb.com> :

>Thanks God.


Just John to you.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote
Reply


« FAQ: Where can I get USB modem drivers for Motorola cell phones? | Migrating from Palm to something else? »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review of Nokia 6280 on the Three 3g network in the UK. Problems, pitfalls and solutions Jonathan uk.telecom.mobile 6 03-22-2007 02:12 PM
Could anything more go wrong with an o2 upgrade than this? (long) Anim uk.telecom.mobile 8 12-09-2006 09:30 AM
O2 mobile phone insurance - bad experience zhyzs@hotmail.com uk.telecom.mobile 14 10-18-2006 03:59 PM
Myopic Economist article: Skype and "How the internet killed the phone business" Valiant uk.telecom.voip 5 09-16-2005 05:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:48 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45