Re: Charter of alt.cellular.attws

In article <8gob631ntjohs57f6iehqusqlj1u1a5ght@4ax.com>, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact.
> An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want
> to make up a valid charter, then you'll have to start a new group.

Charters are only a founding document of a newsgroup. They are not
documents etched in stone. So neither a new charter or a new newsgroup
are needed. This one will be fine for discussing wireless services from
AT&T if people want to use it for such.

--
Charles

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:26:43 -0400, Charles
<fort@his.com.remove.invalid> wrote in
<080620071826439587%fort@his.com.remove.invalid> :

>In article <8gob631ntjohs57f6iehqusqlj1u1a5ght@4ax.com>, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact.
>> An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want
>> to make up a valid charter, then you'll have to start a new group.
>
>Charters are only a founding document of a newsgroup. They are not
>documents etched in stone.

Newsgroup charters cannot be changed once created.

>So neither a new charter or a new newsgroup
>are needed. This one will be fine for discussing wireless services from
>AT&T if people want to use it for such.

True.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Navas, why don't you stop posting you charter? It seems that the folks here
don't want it.

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-E5FDEC.18255711062007@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> In article <52pq6315v3f81ijiqdinacckgc61u11977@4ax.com>,
> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> >Charters are only a founding document of a newsgroup. They are not
>> >documents etched in stone.
>>
>> Newsgroup charters cannot be changed once created.
>
> Rubbish.
>