Re: Charter of alt.cellular.attws

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:4eqn9315ct8uuh0rpgkg7k0j7freq6jtd9@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:36:39 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in <469be4b7$0$27195$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> The above charter isn't on ftp.isc.org, in fact there is no charter
>>> listed for this group.
>>
>>This is correct, there is no charter for alt.cellular.attws. I went
>>back to the beginning of the group using deja.com and could not find a
>>charter.
>
> That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, only that you couldn't find it.
> Hint: There are other places you should have looked.
>
>>I don't think a charter is really necessary,
>
> A charter is always necessary.
>
>>and certainly the charter
>>from a different group doesn't apply to this group.
>
> Correct.

Then stop posting it, Brainiac. By your admission, you are simply being
annoyoing by crossposting the charter to attws.

>
>>There is no way to
>>add a charter for a group that's been around for many years without
>>one.
>
> Correct.
>
>>It's really time to stop the postings to alt.cellular.cingular, and
>>move everything over to alt.cellular.attws.
>
> This newsgroup applies to a company and name that no longer exist.

Correct. Cingular no longer exists, therefore alt.cellular. cingular
applies to a company and name that no longer exist.

> You're just trying to disrupt alt.cellular.cingular
> Give it a rest.
>

Why? You want that street corner all for yourself?