Re: Who is John Navas, and why does he think he owns any newsgroup he chooses to claim he owns?

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-A647CC.21191903102006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> Contributions, please.

Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm concerned, he
can own all of them. At least he provides useful information. How many
other posters can claim the same?

> Eventually he'll have his own Wiki page we can reference.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingula...P_Resources.3F

CS

"Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message >
> Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm concerned, he
> can own all of them. At least he provides useful information. How many
> other posters can claim the same?

Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.

"Jack D. Russell, Sr." <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com.invalid> wrote in
news:45237631$0$97226$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net:

> ===============================================
> * Reply by Jack D. Russell, Sr. <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com>
> * Newsgroup: alt.cellular.cingular
> * Reply to: All; "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
> * Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:51:32 -0400
> * Subj: Re: Who is John Navas, and why does he think he owns any
> newsgroup he chooses to claim he owns?
> ================================================== ===
>
> S>
> S> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message
>
> S>> Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm
> S>> concerned, he can own all of them. At least he provides useful
> S>> information. How many other posters can claim the same?
> S>
> S> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
> S>
>
>
> Ditto!

Same for me.

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:19:11 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com>
wrote:

>In article <Xns985271BAEE5D0Stu707@69.28.186.121>,
> Stu707 <Stu707@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jack D. Russell, Sr." <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com.invalid> wrote in
>> news:45237631$0$97226$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net:
>>
>> > ===============================================
>> > * Reply by Jack D. Russell, Sr. <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com>
>> > * Newsgroup: alt.cellular.cingular
>> > * Reply to: All; "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
>> > * Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:51:32 -0400
>> > * Subj: Re: Who is John Navas, and why does he think he owns any
>> > newsgroup he chooses to claim he owns?
>> > ================================================== ===
>> >
>> > S>
>> > S> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > S>> Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm
>> > S>> concerned, he can own all of them. At least he provides useful
>> > S>> information. How many other posters can claim the same?
>> > S>
>> > S> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
>> > S>
>> >
>> >
>> > Ditto!
>>
>> Same for me.
>
>John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.

Elmo, you've got problems, you need to see a shrink!

That is correct. John seems to be a good guy and is very helpful.

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-AB22C1.18185904102006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> In article <efvr5p$nck$1@news.datemas.de>, "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message >
>> > Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm concerned,
>> > he
>> > can own all of them. At least he provides useful information. How
>> > many
>> > other posters can claim the same?
>>
>> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
>
> John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.
>

> John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.

I'm verifiably not John Navas, but I agree with the various comments. I've
often gone to his web pages for information that was very helpful. And he's
pretty good about answering questions here as well, although his style
obviously irritates some. That's fine, I can deal with it, and I'm sure my
own style irritates some in rec.bicycles.tech where I most-frequently post.

Probably the main thing that bothers some about John Navas is the "finality"
of his posts. He leaves very little room for error or opinion. I, on the
other hand, find it safest to assume that those times I'm 100% certain of
something, I'm usually wrong.

--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-AB22C1.18185904102006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> In article <efvr5p$nck$1@news.datemas.de>, "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message >
>> > Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm concerned,
>> > he
>> > can own all of them. At least he provides useful information. How
>> > many
>> > other posters can claim the same?
>>
>> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
>
> John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.
>

Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> Probably the main thing that bothers some about John Navas is the "finality"
> of his posts. He leaves very little room for error or opinion.

When he backs himself into a corner, he attempts to take the high road
by redefining the topic at hand.

For example, his claim that propagation range is not a factor of the
frequency. In spite of us professionals that attempted to show him the
error of his thinking, he changed his argument by quoting us all the
other just as relevant factors and avoiding the direct topic he
erroneously stated.

Then there's the "extended GSM" issue. In spite of no references to it
in any trade journals or web sites, his response was (to the effect), "I
experienced it, so it has to be true" and "I have confirmed this with
another engineer".

And he never did tell us when the last time he opened a Nokia or
Motorola cellular base station to do maintenance.

"Jack Mac" <camkcaj@parkspringscommunities.com> wrote in message
news:jgj8i2pkmptt8tvbuue3bj9g0f0fpr63fv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:19:11 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
> <elmop@nastydesigns.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <Xns985271BAEE5D0Stu707@69.28.186.121>,
>> Stu707 <Stu707@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Jack D. Russell, Sr." <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:45237631$0$97226$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net:
>>>
>>> > ===============================================
>>> > * Reply by Jack D. Russell, Sr. <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com>
>>> > * Newsgroup: alt.cellular.cingular
>>> > * Reply to: All; "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
>>> > * Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:51:32 -0400
>>> > * Subj: Re: Who is John Navas, and why does he think he owns any
>>> > newsgroup he chooses to claim he owns?
>>> > ================================================== ===
>>> >
>>> > S>
>>> > S> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message
>>> >
>>> > S>> Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm
>>> > S>> concerned, he can own all of them. At least he provides useful
>>> > S>> information. How many other posters can claim the same?
>>> > S>
>>> > S> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
>>> > S>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ditto!
>>>
>>> Same for me.
>>
>>John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.
>
> Elmo, you've got problems, you need to see a shrink!

John Navas has contributed useful information? As opposed to his usual
argumentative, condescending, "You're wrong!" type posts? Guess I missed
that one.

Yes, John Navas does contribute useful information to this newsgroup on a
regular basis and he does own this newsgroup. Now be nice, or John will not
let you play in his sandbox.

> John Navas has contributed useful information? As opposed to his usual
> argumentative, condescending, "You're wrong!" type posts? Guess I missed
> that one.
>
>

Mij Adyaw wrote:
> Yes, John Navas does contribute useful information to this newsgroup on a
> regular basis and he does own this newsgroup. Now be nice, or John will not
> let you play in his sandbox.

Its turning to fall here on planet Earth...whut the weather like on yer
planet? Sorry Mij...just had to say that. heh heh heh