M,I.5 Pers ecution , why the s ecurity services?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do I think the "they" referred. to are the security
services?. Is there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if. there
is a single source, is there any evidence that "they". are professional
"buggers". as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of. a single source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite. obvious that there is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim. which were
said in my home, there must be one group which does the. watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during. travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say,. it
follows that someone must have done the planning for that, and again. a
single. source is indicated.

b) So. why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
organisation, for example. a private detective agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects?. Some detective agencies are
unscrupulous. as has been proved on the occasions in the past when they've
been exposed or caught; they too. can have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there. are reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar enemies of. the
state). on the understanding that if they were caught then they could deny
all knowledge. Why couldn't. that be the case?

The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement. (as opposed
to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to. the media in
particular, and. the fact that the television companies are so involved in
the campaign. The BBC would not directly invade. someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within their. remit to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do so. An organisation of. their stature would not take part in
a campaign set up by private sources. The only. people they would take
material from. would be the security services, presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew out. of the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would
take the. consequences.

State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is. also
indicated by. duration; support for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means. and will of most private sources.
The viciousness. of the slanders and personal denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state. from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination,. and in this case are using their
tried and tested methods to murder with. words an enemy they have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged. to have been filmed
"at it" by an Army intelligence team. which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called. Jones who had been
on the team.. His statements were denied by the defence establishment who
tried. to character-assassinate by describing him as the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn't it?. Thought
only communists behaved. like that?

Hewitt later said that he'd. been spoken to by someone in the army who
revealed the existence of videotapes. of him and Diana, and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt. was made by them to resume their
association.

1326

too much. And this is why, after having given them so
much business, we advise them, if they have some time for relaxation, to
employ it in amusement, in play, and to be always fully occupied.

How hollow and full of ribaldry is the heart of man!

144. I spent a long time in the study of the abstract sciences, and was
disheartened by the small number of fellow-students in them. When I
commenced the study of man, I saw that these abstract sciences are not
suited to man and that I was wandering farther from my own state in
examining them than others in not knowing them. I pardoned their little
knowledge; but I thought at least to find many companions in the study of
man and that it was the true study which is suited to him. I have been
deceived; still fewer study it than geometry. It is only from the want of
knowing how to study this that we seek the other studies. But is it not that
even here is not the knowledge which man should have and that for the
purpose of happiness it is better for him not to know himself.?

145. One thought alone occupies us; we cannot think of two things at the
same time. This is lucky for us according to the world, not according to
God.

146. Man is obviously made to think. It is his whole dignity and his whole
merit; and his whole duty is to think as he ought. Now, the order of thought
is to begin with self, and with its Author and its end.

Now, of what does the world think? Never of this, but of dancing, playing
the lute, singing, making verses, running at the ring, etc., fighting,
making oneself king, without thinking what it is to be a king and what to be
a man.

147. We do not content ourselves with the life we have in ourselves and in
our own being; we desire to live an imaginary life in the mind of others,
and for this purpose we endeavour to shine. We labour unceasingly to adorn
and preserve this imaginary existence and neglect the real. And if we
possess calmness, or generosity, or truthfulness, we are eager to make it
known, so a