Another Flop from Outsourced Maoist Equipment

"A nationwide service outage continues to impact customers of AT&T's
VoIP-based U-Verse Voice service -- users of its fiber-to-the-home TV
and broadband network for phone service as well. Now home-based VoIP
phone users are waiting in Internet chat queues numbering hundreds of
users long seeking solutions, and at least a few customers are
reporting they're waiting on hold from their (working) Verizon
Wireless phones."

http://www.betanews.com/article/Uver...one/1274893922

"Customers of AT&T Inc.'s U-Verse Voice reportedly said their landline
phones have had no dial tones since early Tuesday morning. Those who
were reached by cell were told a server crash brought down. U-Verse
Voice in AT&T's entire 22-state local-phone service area."

http://voice-quality.tmcnet.com/topi...-day-voice.htm

"AT&T recently had another national U-Verse Voice outage on May 16,
but it was overnight so users didn't notice. "

http://www.broadbandreports.com/show...-Outage-108578

In article <406d423f-12d8-4dd7-922e-4690247a6ef2
@u7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, jgrove24@hotmail.com says...
>
> "A nationwide service outage continues to impact customers of AT&T's
> VoIP-based U-Verse Voice service -- users of its fiber-to-the-home TV
> and broadband network for phone service as well. Now home-based VoIP

Wow. Same old BS again?

alt.cellular.verizon has nothing to do with AT&T UVerse or
Alcatel/Lucent/whatever they are today. Nor does the Sprint newsgroup.
Nor, technically, does the AT&T newsgroup.

(Cue rant from JG about how I'm an evil Net-Nazi, or something stupid
like that...)

--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol@JustThe.net

On May 26, 9:44*pm, Steve Sobol <sjso...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> In article <406d423f-12d8-4dd7-922e-4690247a6ef2
> @u7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, jgrov...@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>
> > "A nationwide service outage continues to impact customers of AT&T's
> > VoIP-based U-Verse Voice service -- users of its fiber-to-the-home TV
> > and broadband network for phone service as well. Now home-based VoIP
>
> Wow. Same old BS again?
>
> alt.cellular.verizon has nothing to do with AT&T UVerse or
> Alcatel/Lucent/whatever they are today. Nor does the Sprint newsgroup.
> Nor, technically, does the AT&T newsgroup.
>
> (Cue rant from JG about how I'm an evil Net-Nazi, or something stupid
> like that...)
>

The bit about people using VZ cellphones to call ATT was ironic.

In article <eff5424c-2214-4367-95a7-cf12d1fb6e31
@q8g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, jgrove24@hotmail.com says...


> The bit about people using VZ cellphones to call ATT was ironic.

Still, no one cares about your rants about Alcatel/Lucent or Motorola.
Some of them are tangentially on-topic, but most are off-topic, and if I
dare tell you (again) to STFU, you get really nasty with me.

I still believe you're an ex-employee who's just been pissed off
forever.


--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol@JustThe.net

On May 27, 9:02*pm, Steve Sobol <sjso...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> In article <eff5424c-2214-4367-95a7-cf12d1fb6e31
> @q8g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, jgrov...@hotmail.com says...
>
> > The bit about people using VZ cellphones to call ATT was ironic.
>
> Still, no one cares about your rants about Alcatel/Lucent

LUcifer is DOA. This was a major New Jersey crime syndicate pump and
dump stock swindle.
The failed IP network is likely from Cisco, and exhibited classic user
ramp-up stress test failures.