"Impmon" <impmon@digi.mon> wrote in message
news:842vd31o4apeqb6upm05i3q3nlkgd1en7p@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:45:26 -0400, "Disturbedfred"
> <kenheadleegolfgod<nospam>@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Disturbedfred @comcast.net>" <kenheadleegolfgod<nospam> wrote in message
>>news:ioGdnaH7TIVvv0LbnZ2dnUVZ_ramnZ2d@comcast.co m...
>>>I know early adopting can be painful, but $200 in a little over a month?
>>>Ouch.
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20606900/
>>
>>Pardon me, I guess it has been 2 months.
>>
>
> 10 weeks so 2 and 1/2 months.
>
>>but also angered loyal customers who paid top
>>dollar in the gadget's first 10 weeks on the market.
>
> Why angry? all new toys always started at higher price then dropped
> price over time. Why I remember waaaaay back in 1977 when a new Atari
> system was $300, and was selling new for $50 during the fun is back in
> the late 80's.
And you're equating this to a 30% drop in 10 weeks? 30% in 10 weeks is huge
even in the cell phone market. It's simple demand vs. production. Obviously,
more demand was anticipated than actually appeared. Either way, your reply
made me chuckle.