Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
have a dividend.
"The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
depreciation is also expected to fall."
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:06:00 -0600, Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com>
wrote in <bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com>:
>Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>
>New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>have a dividend.
>
>"The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>depreciation is also expected to fall."
>
>http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford
Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>
> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
> have a dividend.
>
> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>
> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>
>
>
Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days when
I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to the next
town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your phone from ONLY
ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your iPhone. You don't REALLY
want to eliminate all ATT's competition, again, do you?
NOT!
ATT bought Centennial Communications, yesterday.....monopoly in action....
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:28:23 -0800, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>As I predicted back when it went after NEXTEL.
>
Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
Google proves that.
>
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:06:00 -0600, Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com>
>wrote in <bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com>:
>
>>Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>
>>New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>have a dividend.
>>
>>"The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>
>>http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:15:42 -0600, Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com>
wrote in <3etjh49db0tfbal2umu86nje2jlcjadeoh@4ax.com>:
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:28:23 -0800, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>As I predicted back when it went after NEXTEL.
>
>Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
>but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
>
>Google proves that.
Thou doth attempt to spliteth hairs, but the record doth say otherwise:
<news:eog4d2la60imuut71svjqucvs4p9gb758r@4ax.com >
<news:bt4hm3t9kf51pusc5762b94it2ar2i489l@4ax.com >
<news:6r6gs394d938u4si85j0189bqivolknqfk@4ax.com >
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>In message news:Xns9B538B839AB9Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13, Larry
><noone@home.com> done wrote:
>
>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>> news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>>
>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>> have a dividend.
>>>
>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>>
>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
>>
>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
>>
>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
>> again, do you?
>
>If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
>Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"
YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
On 2008-11-12, John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
>>but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
>>
>>Google proves that.
OMG. Would the two of you please stop waving your weenies around and
stick 'em back in your pants, please? The "I told you so" crap is childish.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.
In article <slrnghkd9c.rol.sjsobol@amethyst.justthe.net>,
Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
> On 2008-11-12, John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> >>Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
> >>but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
> >>
> >>Google proves that.
>
> OMG. Would the two of you please stop waving your weenies around and
> stick 'em back in your pants, please? The "I told you so" crap is childish.
John could at least post a weenie-waving alt.cellular.cingular FAQ. Been
a while since we've seen on.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:54:47 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
<Xns9B53D4BEC478Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com :
>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>
>What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....
That would be us, and we did throw the rascals out.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:06:10 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
<Xns9B53EB045C6ECnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com :
>
>> That would be us
>
>Are you a banker?
I'm a voter.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
On 12 Nov 2008 12:20:42 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>In message news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com, Ron
><ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> done wrote:
>
>> On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In message news:Xns9B538B839AB9Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13, Larry
>>><noone@home.com> done wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>>>> news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>>>>
>>>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>>>> have a dividend.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
>>>>
>>>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
>>>>
>>>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
>>>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
>>>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
>>>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
>>>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
>>>> again, do you?
>>>
>>>If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
>>>Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"
>>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Poor deluded fool.
>
>Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM was a
>PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
Sorry your McSame lost, but the Governbor of Michigan is not a Crooked
CEO like Cheney was.
That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote in
news:Xns9B544AB37903AThat80sGuy@198.186.190.61:
> Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM
> was a PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
>
>
The list of major contributors to the Obama/Democrat election reads like
the fortune 500 companys and Forbes Magazine's richest men. Their minions
contributed billions. They remain in the same control of the nation
because they maintain control of the MONEY SUPPLY and its INTEREST and have
since 1913 when the Federal Reserve Private Secret Bank Corporation was
invented by the richest bankers on Jekyll Island, GA.
Nothing has changed...only the faces and boldfaced lies to maintain the
facade of "change" while maintaining firm CONTROL of all of us with DEBT.
The whole fake system runs on control by DEBT.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:18:12 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote:
>Ron wrote:
>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>
>Why do you think there was this huge rush to complete mergers that
>reduced competition?!
Verizon is buying Altell, Sprint tried to sell off Nextel for 6
Billion.
On 11/11/08 7:54 PM, in article Xns9B53D4BEC478Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13,
"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote:
> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
> news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com:
>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>>
>
> What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....
>
True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
walk on water...
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:54:47 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
> <Xns9B53D4BEC478Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>
>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>> news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com:
>>
>>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>> What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....
>
> That would be us, and we did throw the rascals out.
Nav-*** you ain't seen nothing yet! Kiss your 401k goodbye...
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:06:10 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
> <Xns9B53EB045C6ECnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>
>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>> news:d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com:
>>
>>> That would be us
>>
>> Are you a banker?
>
> I'm a voter.
You're a zombie, and in CA *ANYONE* can vote. You asked for it...
> On 12 Nov 2008 12:20:42 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>
>> In message news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com, Ron
>> <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> done wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message news:Xns9B538B839AB9Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13, Larry
>>>> <noone@home.com> done wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>>>>> have a dividend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>>>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>>>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
>>>>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
>>>>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
>>>>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
>>>>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
>>>>> again, do you?
>>>>
>>>> If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
>>>> Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"
>>>
>>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Poor deluded fool.
>>
>> Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM was a
>> PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
>
> Sorry your McSame lost, but the Governbor of Michigan is not a Crooked
> CEO like Cheney was.
Rather like a Chicago politician? How wonderful.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:38:32 -0600, George Kerby
<ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
<C541B428.17616%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>walk on water...
Racism. How lovely.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:38:32 -0600, George Kerby
> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
> <C541B428.17616%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>
>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>> walk on water...
>
> Racism. How lovely.
Liberals. How pathetic.
On 13 Nov 2008 23:58:44 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote in
<Xns9B55C111FB7D1That80sGuy@198.186.190.61>:
>In message news:srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> done wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:38:32 -0600, George Kerby
>><ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>><C541B428.17616%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>
>>>True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic
>>>Negro" can walk on water...
>>
>> Racism. How lovely.
>
>Uh, google this:
>
>"Magic Negro" "Spike Lee"
Racism is racism. Matters not what Google finds.
>Report back with your findings.
Grow up.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>>> walk on water...
>>
>> Racism. How lovely.
>Liberals. How pathetic.
Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
><ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
><C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>
>>On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>>>> walk on water...
>>>
>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>Liberals. How pathetic.
>
>Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
have "fun" up there?
Anon E. Muss answered:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
>> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> <C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>>>>> walk on water...
>>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>> Liberals. How pathetic.
>> Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
>
> Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
> have "fun" up there?
I say lets become a group, and all go burn the whole city down while
they're sleeping. NO GREAT LOSS, and who knows maybe ARNIE will give us
medals. No Wonder they WANT to be called QUEER.
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
>> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> <C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro"
>>>>> can
>>>>> walk on water...
>>>>
>>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>> Liberals. How pathetic.
>>
>> Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
>
> Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
> have "fun" up there?
"Up" there!?!
BAW-HAW-HAW-HAW!!!
Nav-*** is missing his gerbil...
> Anon E. Muss answered:
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
>> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
>>> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> <C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article
>>>> srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro"
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> walk on water...
>>>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>>> Liberals. How pathetic.
>>> Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
>>
>> Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
>> have "fun" up there?
>
> I say lets become a group, and all go burn the whole city down while
> they're sleeping. NO GREAT LOSS, and who knows maybe ARNIE will give us
> medals. No Wonder they WANT to be called QUEER.
>
>
>
<http://my.telegraph.co.uk/cheech/blog/2008/10/29/for_oldtom>
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:26:19 -0800, Cody <notever@msn.org> wrote in
<IpadnZWhFKemuIPUnZ2dnUVZ_tfinZ2d@giganews.com>:
>Anon E. Muss answered:
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
>> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
>>> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> <C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
>>>>>> walk on water...
>>>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>>> Liberals. How pathetic.
>>> Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
>>
>> Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
>> have "fun" up there?
>
>I say lets become a group, and all go burn the whole city down while
>they're sleeping. NO GREAT LOSS, and who knows maybe ARNIE will give us
>medals. No Wonder they WANT to be called QUEER.
Not only racist and fascist, but also homophobic. How nice.
I'm done. Rant on without me.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:3e3vh4hb6i6lca0qk0a3ip3da4ccmmn099@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:26:19 -0800, Cody <notever@msn.org> wrote in
> <IpadnZWhFKemuIPUnZ2dnUVZ_tfinZ2d@giganews.com>:
>
>>Anon E. Muss answered:
>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:58:06 -0800, John Navas
>>> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:35:30 -0600, George Kerby
>>>> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> <C54223F2.17683%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/13/08 12:18 PM, in article
>>>>> srroh41updh8eh0te7pdu48b2298adfcek@4ax.com,
>>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic
>>>>>>> Negro" can
>>>>>>> walk on water...
>>>>>> Racism. How lovely.
>>>>> Liberals. How pathetic.
>>>> Conservatives. How disastrous for the country.
>>>
>>> Ahhh... "San Francisco values" (see <http://tinyurl.com/5angja>). You
>>> have "fun" up there?
>>
>>I say lets become a group, and all go burn the whole city down while
>>they're sleeping. NO GREAT LOSS, and who knows maybe ARNIE will give us
>>medals. No Wonder they WANT to be called QUEER.
>
> Not only racist and fascist, but also homophobic. How nice.
> I'm done. Rant on without me.
Don't let the door hit your *** on the way out.
> Best regards,
> John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>
>
> "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
> difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
> boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford