Verizon has blocked this alt.cellular usenet feed from their
servers ;>(
Survey: 70% of all iPhone Apps May be Free
According to a survey of developers conducted this week at Apple's
World Wide Developer Conference, and highlighted over at Apple
Insider, many of the potential applications being developed for the
iPhone will have an average cost of $3.00 or under -- and many others
may be completely free. The survey, conducted by Piper Jaffray analyst
Gene Munster right after the Steve Jobs Keynote on Monday, revealed
some other interesting information besides potential application
pricing.
The survey also found that 50% of the developers plan on building
applications only for the iPhone while the other 50% were going to
make application for the iPhone, the iPod Touch, and for Macs as well.
In addition, Munster found that many developers were also authoring
what he called "Enterprise apps" as well as entertainment apps,
location-based apps which take advantage of the iPhone's GPS
capabilities and video games.
According to Munster: "We see this as a positive indicator of the
potential for Enterprise adoption of the iPhone. We found the average
cost of iPhone apps on the App Store to be $2.29, with 71% being
free." So, if you love the iPhone or iPod Touch and plan on putting
lots of applications on them, if the survey proves correct, this is
good news for you.
MORE
In the din of announcements from WWDC on Monday, one of the
underreported features for iPhone apps is "ad hoc" app distribution:
registering up to 100 iPhones, and distributing your apps yourself.
Macworld's John Welch has a good overview of Ad Hoc and enterprise
distribution, and what it means for IT departments. "[H]aving your
applications distributed from your own servers on your own network
just makes sense," he writes. "It makes security issues simpler, saves
on external bandwidth usage, and simplifies the process of adding,
updating, and removing applications."
Webmonkey, on the other hand, completely missed this part of the
keynote, writing a review of the App Store that omits the ad hoc
distribution plan and calls the App Store's exclusivity "yuck." Plus,
it neglects to mention the still-thriving jailbreak community, and the
legions of Installer.app users.
Ad hoc distribution means great things for proprietary apps for teams,
classrooms, and large organizations.
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.t-mobile.]
On 2008-06-13, 4.vic.healey@gmail.com <4.vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Survey: 70% of all iPhone Apps May be Free
Hey Troll, this is the T-Mo newsgroup. You apparently still have a reading
comprehension problem. alt.cellular.cingular and alt.cellular.attws are
that way ---->
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:36:39 -0700 (PDT), "4.vic.healey@gmail.com"
<4.vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:
>Verizon has blocked this alt.cellular usenet feed from their
>servers ;>(
>
They promised NY Authorities they'd block child porn.
>
>Survey: 70% of all iPhone Apps May be Free
>
>According to a survey of developers conducted this week at Apple's
>World Wide Developer Conference, and highlighted over at Apple
>Insider, many of the potential applications being developed for the
>iPhone will have an average cost of $3.00 or under -- and many others
>may be completely free. The survey, conducted by Piper Jaffray analyst
>Gene Munster right after the Steve Jobs Keynote on Monday, revealed
>some other interesting information besides potential application
>pricing.
>
>The survey also found that 50% of the developers plan on building
>applications only for the iPhone while the other 50% were going to
>make application for the iPhone, the iPod Touch, and for Macs as well.
>In addition, Munster found that many developers were also authoring
>what he called "Enterprise apps" as well as entertainment apps,
>location-based apps which take advantage of the iPhone's GPS
>capabilities and video games.
>
>According to Munster: "We see this as a positive indicator of the
>potential for Enterprise adoption of the iPhone. We found the average
>cost of iPhone apps on the App Store to be $2.29, with 71% being
>free." So, if you love the iPhone or iPod Touch and plan on putting
>lots of applications on them, if the survey proves correct, this is
>good news for you.
>
>MORE
>
>In the din of announcements from WWDC on Monday, one of the
>underreported features for iPhone apps is "ad hoc" app distribution:
>registering up to 100 iPhones, and distributing your apps yourself.
>Macworld's John Welch has a good overview of Ad Hoc and enterprise
>distribution, and what it means for IT departments. "[H]aving your
>applications distributed from your own servers on your own network
>just makes sense," he writes. "It makes security issues simpler, saves
>on external bandwidth usage, and simplifies the process of adding,
>updating, and removing applications."
>
>Webmonkey, on the other hand, completely missed this part of the
>keynote, writing a review of the App Store that omits the ad hoc
>distribution plan and calls the App Store's exclusivity "yuck." Plus,
>it neglects to mention the still-thriving jailbreak community, and the
>legions of Installer.app users.
>
>Ad hoc distribution means great things for proprietary apps for teams,
>classrooms, and large organizations.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:31:40 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article
><d80ca078-d2b9-43c1-815c-ef3294e92567@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> "4.vic.healey@gmail.com" <4.vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Survey: 70% of all iPhone Apps May be Free
>
>Survey: 90% of all sex may be free
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:28:29 +0000 (UTC), Steve Sobol
<sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.t-mobile.]
>On 2008-06-13, 4.vic.healey@gmail.com <4.vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Survey: 70% of all iPhone Apps May be Free
>
>Hey Troll, this is the T-Mo newsgroup. You apparently still have a reading
>comprehension problem. alt.cellular.cingular and alt.cellular.attws are
>that way ---->
Phillipe followed me? Re: Great app news for iPhone users
Crossposted to alt.cellular.sprintpcs just so people can see this.
Phillipe is now posting in the T-Mo newsgroup. Woohoo!
On 2008-06-13, Ron <ronclifford@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>Hey Troll, this is the T-Mo newsgroup. You apparently still have a reading
>>comprehension problem. alt.cellular.cingular and alt.cellular.attws are
>>that way ---->
>
> Did Steve give up on Sprint?
Did you give up on AT&T, Troll#2?
Are you posting here because you got tired of me pointing out repeatedly
that you said you'd never return to the SPCS newsgroup?
I find it amusing that you're here. As far as I know, you're not now and
never have been a T-Mo customer. I find it curious that you decided to
follow me here... unless you actually ARE a T-Mo customer now, which I'd
find hilarious because you used to think AT&T was The Greatest Wireless
Carrier In The Universe.
Anyhow, yes, you already know I gave up on Sprint. They were fine until
the merger. But I really didn't have a choice in switching... mom-in-law
switched to T-Mo and we would have lost our free mobile-to-mobile if we didn't
switch. And my wife talks to her mother quite often; our bill would have gone
sky-high.
Any other questions, Phil? Are you done stalking me? Are you finally ready
to get a life? (I think I know the answer to that last question)
> According to Munster: "We see this as a positive indicator of the
> potential for Enterprise adoption of the iPhone. We found the average
> cost of iPhone apps on the App Store to be $2.29, with 71% being
> free." So, if you love the iPhone or iPod Touch and plan on putting
> lots of applications on them, if the survey proves correct, this is
> good news for you.
>
>
Wow...Sales forecasts for iPhone must be worse than expected! Apple never
gives anything away for free!...well, never anything of value....(c;
Look for the Freeware or OPEN SOURCE section at your local Apple store
iStore websites. See all the FREEWARE?
There'd only be one reason to give it away....sales needs a big boost.
Great app news for iPhone users 
Linear Mode
