Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > US Networks > alt.cellular.t-mobile
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2009, 12:25 AM
Steve Sobol
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: =MEGA FAIL= T-mobile Sidekick servers los *all* data, phones don't store data localy, and company urges customers to not turn off or reset their phones!

[Irrelevant politics newsgroups snipped; T-Mobile newsgroup added]

In article <1ff08222-0588-453b-b262-8b128cfbf200
@b3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, blinkingblythe02@gmail.com says...
>
> YIKES! The iPhone suddenly looks real good about now
>


(Yes, I know this is probably one of the idiot iPhone fanboys posting
about this, but I still feel compelled to comment.)

I find it hard to determine whether this is sheer incompetence on the
part of the ass-clowns at Microsoft, or whether it was intentional since
the Sidekick ran on NetBSD and Java, both of which compete with
Microsoft technologies.

Either way, it doesn't look good. Either way, I hope T-Mo is gearing up
to sue Microsoft into oblivion.* I find it extremely hard to believe
that they weren't keeping multiple redundant backups of customers' data
since purchasing Danger, I'm sure that M$ extends that courtesy to users
of M$ services based on M$ technology. Meanwhile, I guarantee that T-Mo
will bear the brunt of the fallout, because people don't pay Microsoft
directly for the devices or the service.

> http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/0...rs-Backup-Data
>
> "T-Mobile's popular Sidekick brand of devices and their users are
> facing a data loss crisis. According to the T-Mobile community forums,
> Microsoft/Danger has suffered a catastrophic server failure that has
> resulted in the loss of all personal data not stored on the phones.


> They are advising users not to turn off their phones, reset them or
> let the batteries die in them for fear of losing what data remains on
> the devices. Microsoft/Danger has stated that they cannot recover the
> data but are still trying. Already people are clamoring for a lawsuit.
> Should we continue to trust cloud computing content providers with our
> personal information? Perhaps they should have used ZFS or btrfs for
> their servers."<snip>



Oh, give me a break, typical /. crap. The cloud isn't the problem, the
service provider is the problem, and I DON'T mean T-Mobile, I mean
Microsoft.

> Not to mention that users now have to hear about Microsoft/danger/
> pink/stink or whatever babbling though their heads while they are
> scared to death about their important docs or whatever. There will be
> gnashing of teeth, there will be pitchforks held, and a huge lawsuit
> over this fiasco


I'm sure there will be gnashing of teeth, and Microsoft deserves to get
sued. If they were trying to kill off the Sidekick, this was THE WRONG
way to do it.

Meanwhile, as I understand it, most of the pre-Microsoft engineers had
left Danger long before this... and the Next Big WinMo Upgrade is
nowhere near finished... I suspect things are going to be interesting at
M$, at least for the foreseeable future.



**SJS

*OK, "Oblivion" is the wrong word. M$ is huge; they aren't going
anywhere. Still, I think T-Mo has grounds to go after them, and I think
T-Mo's Sidekick users probably also do.

--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol@JustThe.net

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2009, 02:02 AM
tlvp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: =MEGA FAIL= T-mobile Sidekick servers los *all* data, phonesdon't store data localy, and company urges customers to not turn off or resettheir phones!

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:25:24 -0400, Steve Sobol <sjsobol@justthe.net> wrote:

> [Irrelevant politics newsgroups snipped; T-Mobile newsgroup added]
>
> In article <1ff08222-0588-453b-b262-8b128cfbf200
> @b3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, blinkingblythe02@gmail.com says...
>>
>> YIKES! The iPhone suddenly looks real good about now
>>

>
> (Yes, I know this is probably one of the idiot iPhone fanboys posting
> about this, but I still feel compelled to comment.)
>
> I find it hard to determine whether this is sheer incompetence on the
> part of the ass-clowns at Microsoft, or whether it was intentional since
> the Sidekick ran on NetBSD and Java, both of which compete with
> Microsoft technologies.
>
> Either way, it doesn't look good. Either way, I hope T-Mo is gearing up
> to sue Microsoft into oblivion.* I find it extremely hard to believe
> that they weren't keeping multiple redundant backups of customers' data
> since purchasing Danger, I'm sure that M$ extends that courtesy to users
> of M$ services based on M$ technology. Meanwhile, I guarantee that T-Mo
> will bear the brunt of the fallout, because people don't pay Microsoft
> directly for the devices or the service.
>
>> http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/0...rs-Backup-Data
>>
>> ... [snip] ...


More recent update:

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/1...-and-sabotage/ .

Cheers, -- tlvp
--
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2009, 07:51 PM
zeez
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: =MEGA FAIL= T-mobile Sidekick servers los *all* data, phonesdon't store data localy, and company urges customers to not turn off or resettheir phones!

Apparently, M$ now says that they can recover most of the data:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fas...n_recover.html
I am still not going to move to this so called "cloud computing" BS
except to use it as an online backup of data I have stored locally.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45