Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > US Networks > alt.cellular.t-mobile
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2011, 07:15 AM
Cameo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Self-appointed enviro busy bodies at it again

Activists Want 'Obsolete' Cell Tower Rules Changed:

<http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=8546>

Who is funding these guys?

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2011, 01:09 PM
dgk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Self-appointed enviro busy bodies at it again

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:15:53 -0700, "Cameo" <cameo@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>Activists Want 'Obsolete' Cell Tower Rules Changed:
>
><http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=8546>
>
>Who is funding these guys?


Right, there's a lot of money to be made by opposing cell towers?

Maybe they're actually worried about the effects of the radiation?

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2011, 06:17 PM
Cameo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Self-appointed enviro busy bodies at it again

"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote:

> Right, there's a lot of money to be made by opposing cell towers?


Unless they keep some issues alive, the donors might stop sending in
the money. This is behind much of ACLU law suits and Ralph Nader's
buzzing.

> Maybe they're actually worried about the effects of the radiation?


Did they find any proof that justifies it or they are just trying to
confuse the scientifically undereducated American public with a
radiation scare, implying that cell tower radiation is just like nuclear
radiation?


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:33 PM
Todd Allcock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Self-appointed enviro busy bodies at it again

At 28 Jul 2011 11:17:23 -0700 Cameo wrote:
> "dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote:
>
> > Right, there's a lot of money to be made by opposing cell towers?

>
> Unless they keep some issues alive, the donors might stop sending
> in the money. This is behind much of ACLU law suits and Ralph
> Nader's buzzing.
>
> > Maybe they're actually worried about the effects of the radiation?

>
> Did they find any proof that justifies it or they are just trying to
> confuse the scientifically undereducated American public with a
> radiation scare, implying that cell tower radiation is just like
> nuclear radiation?


Isn't radiation "bad?" I just threw out all of my light bulbs when I
found out they all emitted electromagnetic radiation, and some of it was
even in the visible spectrum!



Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2011, 04:13 AM
Cameo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Self-appointed enviro busy bodies at it again

"Todd Allcock" <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
> Isn't radiation "bad?" I just threw out all of my light bulbs when I
> found out they all emitted electromagnetic radiation, and some of it
> was
> even in the visible spectrum!


Right. I hope you did not miss your Wi-Fi router and Bluetooth or we
might see your obituary here soon. :-(



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Busy(?) tones from PAP2T Roger Mills uk.telecom.voip 4 01-31-2008 06:55 PM
Re: Busy circuits survey james g. keegan jr. alt.cellular.cingular 1 05-05-2007 05:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45