> On Oct 16, 2:35 pm, Bill Gates <i...@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote:
> > ed <n...@atwistedweb.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > oh, and your story above keeps falling apart (above, you said your
> > > '$299' iphones were the $499 version (that'd be 4gb for those keeping
> > > track), minus rebates and 'tips', but looking back at the previous
> > > thread about your several phones, you said you had the 8gb versions
> > > (which would have been the $599 version))
> >
> > i've never said i owned 2 8GB iphones, even 1 8GB. i own 2 4GB's and
> > that has never changed.
> >
> > ed is loosing his memory?
>
> no, i have a pretty good memory, and i'm pretty sure you mentioned
> having 8gb iphones... checking google...
>
> here (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.....advocacy/msg/
> b1ab9d34e9907c24) you said:
> "Mine has 8GB of storage..."
>
> and here (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.....advocacy/msg/
> 5013200807df7cfa), in response to 'tinman' saying ' am hoping they
> release a 16 GB model for $499. If so I'd buy it and give my 8 GB to
> my wife. Actually, I might still buy another 8 GB if I can get it
> cheaper than $399 (refurb).', you said, 'Yeah, I've been thinking the
> same thing all day.'
>
> and here, in june, (http://groups.google.com/group/
> comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9ea2fda6968c513d), you said, "I was able to
> obtain 4 of them today, 3-4GB and 1-8GB ", which you contradicted
> here, in sept, (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/
> msg/5d6116034d4f214c), when you said: "For me, I bought 2 of the 8GB
> and 2 4GB..." (which is kind of strange because just a few days after
> that you talk about having bought a total of 9- did you buy 5 that
> week or something?)
"Bill Gates" <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in message
news:im-2162C6.00594217102007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...
> ed <news@atwistedweb.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 16, 2:35 pm, Bill Gates <i...@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote:
>> > ed <n...@atwistedweb.com> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > > oh, and your story above keeps falling apart (above, you said your
>> > > '$299' iphones were the $499 version (that'd be 4gb for those keeping
>> > > track), minus rebates and 'tips', but looking back at the previous
>> > > thread about your several phones, you said you had the 8gb versions
>> > > (which would have been the $599 version))
>> >
>> > i've never said i owned 2 8GB iphones, even 1 8GB. i own 2 4GB's and
>> > that has never changed.
>> >
>> > ed is loosing his memory?
>>
>> no, i have a pretty good memory, and i'm pretty sure you mentioned
>> having 8gb iphones... checking google...
>>
>> here (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.....advocacy/msg/
>> b1ab9d34e9907c24) you said:
>> "Mine has 8GB of storage..."
>>
>> and here (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.....advocacy/msg/
>> 5013200807df7cfa), in response to 'tinman' saying ' am hoping they
>> release a 16 GB model for $499. If so I'd buy it and give my 8 GB to
>> my wife. Actually, I might still buy another 8 GB if I can get it
>> cheaper than $399 (refurb).', you said, 'Yeah, I've been thinking the
>> same thing all day.'
>>
>> and here, in june, (http://groups.google.com/group/
>> comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9ea2fda6968c513d), you said, "I was able to
>> obtain 4 of them today, 3-4GB and 1-8GB ", which you contradicted
>> here, in sept, (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/
>> msg/5d6116034d4f214c), when you said: "For me, I bought 2 of the 8GB
>> and 2 4GB..." (which is kind of strange because just a few days after
>> that you talk about having bought a total of 9- did you buy 5 that
>> week or something?)
>
> slow news day, ed?
haha, is that your only response to being caught in your lie(s)?
> At 16 Oct 2007 10:42:17 +0100 Peter Hayes wrote:
>
> > They were credits you should have passed on to your "clients".
>
>
> Don't you remember? His "clients" were so impressed with the value of
> their iPhones, they didn't they deserved the credits and bestowed them
> upon Oxford for leading them down the path of cellular salvation.
>
> To quote from the Book of Oxford; "Try to keep up..." ;-)
:-)
His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
Let's see,
Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
> His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
>
> Let's see,
>
> Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
>
> Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
In news:colalovesmacs-51CA94.20261117102007@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net,
Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com> typed:
> notinuse2@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
>
>> His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
>>
>> Let's see,
>>
>> Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
>>
>> Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
>
> they are "pen names", not nyms.
>
> http://www.ivanhoffman.com/pennames.html
>
> and i have over 100 clients, but only about 10% have iphones as of today.
So about 90% of your clients are brighter than the rest. lol
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:26:11 -0600, Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com>
wrote:
>notinuse2@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
>
>> His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
>>
>> Let's see,
>>
>> Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
>>
>> Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
>
>they are "pen names", not nyms.
>
>http://www.ivanhoffman.com/pennames.html
>
>and i have over 100 clients, but only about 10% have iphones as of today.
I'm not sure that the Star Wars figures you have on your desk in your
mom's basement actually count as clients. 8)
> notinuse2@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
>
> > His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
> >
> > Let's see,
> >
> > Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
> >
> > Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
>
> they are "pen names", not nyms.
>
> http://www.ivanhoffman.com/pennames.html
>
> and i have over 100 clients,
In article <oyzRi.341798$dA7.296704@newsfe16.lga>,
"IMHO IIRC" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.NOSPAM> wrote:
> In news:colalovesmacs-51CA94.20261117102007@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net,
> Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com> typed:
> > notinuse2@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
> >
> >> His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
> >>
> >> Let's see,
> >>
> >> Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
> >>
> >> Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
> >
> > they are "pen names", not nyms.
> >
> > http://www.ivanhoffman.com/pennames.html
> >
> > and i have over 100 clients, but only about 10% have iphones as of today.
>
> So about 90% of your clients are brighter than the rest. lol
The main reason more companies are not switching to iPhones is the cost
of switching. I know too many Blackberry users who lust for the iPhone,
but they're required to use the company-issued one.
I'd also venture to say that a huge percentage of Blackberry users were
given phones and service by their companies. Free is better than pay.
> Oxford <colalovesmacs@smart.com> wrote:
>
>
>>notinuse2@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>His clients are probably as virtual as the various nyms he posts under.
>>>
>>>Let's see,
>>>
>>>Oxford, Bill Gates, Mark Thompson, none, Wegie, Mr T, Gene Jones.
>>>
>>>Seven "clients", seven nyms. Coincidence? You decide...
>>
>>they are "pen names", not nyms.
>>
>>http://www.ivanhoffman.com/pennames.html
>>
>>and i have over 100 clients,
>
>
> Is that your feedback rating on eBay?
>
Re: iPhone the 21st Century Edsel 
Linear Mode
