In article <4aba9eb7$0$1598$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
scharf.steven@geemail.com says...
> "just tell people which carriers have coverage in which places and let
> them get that carrier." Instead, they are now going to allow carriers to
> put towers into city parks which I think is a terrible plan.
I will never, ever, EVER use Verizon Wireless again. They screwed me
hard. They refused to fix their network for six months and only finally
admitted the network had problems when I was ready to quit. I WILL NEVER
go back to VZW, especially since Sprint and T-Mo have caught up to them
in terms of local coverage IN THE AREA WHERE I LIVE.
I know you like being able to crow about how VZW is the best carrier in
Silicon Valley, and I'm very sorry that you might lose that ability, but
saying what you just said is stupid.
Between this BS and your constant shilling for PagePlus... well, I don't
ever accuse people of being VZW shills. You're actually the first, Mr.
Shill.
Are you trying to lose every last shred of credibility?
> Complicating things is that my city is the headquarters of the company
> that makes the iPhone, so it would be politically incorrect for the city
> council to tell people to choose a carrier that doesn't offer the
> iPhone.
Woo. So you live in Cupertino. AT&T sucks too... they're thieves. I
wouldn't use an iPhone if AT&T was giving me a free phone AND paying me
to use the service.
> While I always try to pick apart weasel word advertising, and I'm
> displeased with Verizon for various things they've done, you can't fault
> their coverage when compared to the other carriers.
Yes, and if other carriers improve coverage in your area, VZW would lose
their wide lead over the competition, eh?
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol@JustThe.net