Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > US Networks > alt.cellular.verizon
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:56 AM
Radium
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lieberm

On Jul 19, 12:06 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...e614fe3?hl=en&
:

> Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> hath wroth:


> >On Jul 1, 7:24 am, shawn.cormi...@gmail.com wrote in
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...sg/696d6abf90c...


> >> how would u like to change the cell phone industry?


> >Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
> >start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less and
> >a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz.


> Very roughly, the current 8Kbits/sec encoding rate,
> compared to your 44Kbit/sec, will only handle about 1/5th the number
> of users.


Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?

Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?


The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.

The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.
The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less.


> >1. In its uncompressed form, the audio must have a bit-resolution of
> >at least 16-bit


> The encoding resolution is not changed by compression. If you encode
> something with 16 bit resolution, and compress it, you still have 16
> bit data coming out. It's the data rate or thruput that changes with
> compression.


Okay.

> >2. The sample-rate of the compressed and the uncompressed version of
> >the audio must be the same.


> Not possible. If the rate in and rate out are identical, then there's
> no compression happening.


Yes it is possible and it is compression. The uncompressed audio is a
monaural linear PCM at 44.1-KHz-sample-rate with a 16-bit-resolution
-- this audio has a bit-rate of 705.6 kbps. The compressed audio is a
monaural CBR WMA at 44.1-KHz-sample-rate with a bit-rate of 20 kbps or
less.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Yes it is possible and it is compression.

Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????

Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????
Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?????????

There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.

There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.
There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally
different from the sample rate. Totally.

BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

In linear PCM audio:

BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels

Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel.

44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps

BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.
BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things.


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:19 AM
@.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: glucegen1x@excite.com IS A MOON CRICKET

EAT **** AND HOWL AT THE MOON!

glucegen1x@excite.com IS A PIECE OF ****!

--
-

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:32 AM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

Radium <glucegen1x@excite.com> hath wroth:
(1154 lines of drivel easily deleted....)

If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and
agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer
gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these
newsgroups again?

Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems
to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three
line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your
ravings.


--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:23 AM
Radium
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:

> If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and
> agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer
> gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these
> newsgroups again?
>
> Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems
> to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three
> line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your
> ravings.


Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever-
so-interesting questions in http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en&
:

1. Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?

2. Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?

Now please re-read http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en&
and answer the questions in that message!!

please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please please please please please
please please please please please please


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 12:32 PM
Kurt Ullman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann!

In article <1185168192.764766.74220@z24g2000prh.googlegroups. com>,
Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
>
> > If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and
> > agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer
> > gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these
> > newsgroups again?
> >
> > Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems
> > to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three
> > line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your
> > ravings.

>
> Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever-
> so-interesting questions in
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en&
> :
>
> 1. Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
>
> 2. Where/when is there any change in sample-rate?
>
> Now please re-read
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en&
> and answer the questions in that message!!
>

Hey Jeff,
If the rather large check for consulting fees to answer
specific questions came through, then you should probably answer his
question. Otherwise, I think the R-man is getting a little out of
control demanding answers to his question for free.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:22 PM
Richard Crowley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

"Jeff Liebermann" wrote ...
> Radium <glucegen1x@excite.com> hath wroth:
> (1154 lines of drivel easily deleted....)
>
> If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and
> agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer
> gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these
> newsgroups again?


Or you could plonk him and stop feeding the troll.
It would significantly enhance the signal-to-noise
ratio of these newsgroups!

The troll-feeders are becoming as much a problem
as the trolls themselves. GET A CLUE, FOLKS!



Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:23 PM
Richard Crowley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann!

"Kurt Ullman" wrote -
> If the rather large check for consulting fees to answer specific
> questions came through, then you should probably answer his
> question. Otherwise, I think the R-man is getting a little out of
> control demanding answers to his question for free.


Your "R-man" is a notorious Usenet troll.
Plonk/ignore him. Don't feed the troll.



Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:40 PM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> hath wroth:

>On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
>
>> If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and
>> agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer
>> gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these
>> newsgroups again?


>Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever-
>so-interesting questions in http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en&


Ok, so you don't want my proclamation and ritual sacrifice. Your
loss.

Perhaps a different ploy might induce you to evaporate into a cloud of
smog. Ever consider that I might not be able to decode whatever
you're asking? Perhaps you haven't offered me sufficient motivation
to expound on whatever the long lost subject you're ranting about?
Perhaps it's because I might consider the effort a monumental waste of
time, exercise in educational futility, and what is commonly known as
"feeding the trolls"? Perhaps I'm offended by your massive cross
postings for the apparent sole purpose of getting my attention? Of
course, there's always the possibility that I don't know anything
about codecs and compress, but that's easily solved with a suitable
search engine. Instant expert, just add Google.

However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you. I
judge people by their willingness and ability to learn. Helping such
people is why I spend an inordinate amount of time answering questions
in newsgroups and mailing lists. When someone shows an inability or
unwillingness to absorb information and digest it into knowledge, I
ignore them. If I think there's some hope, sometimes I snarl at them.
In your case, it's not even worth my effort snarling. Your inability
to formulate an intelligible question, inability to stay focused, your
repetitious behavior, and failure to appreciate my humor, marks you as
a loser, unworthy of my limited time.

So, go away. Do some reading on basic electronics, communications
theory, compression techniques, established practices, standards,
tact, diplomacy, and usenet etiquette. When you've done all this,
reformulate your questions into an organized form that can be answered
without guesswork or a Ouija board. Then, MAYBE someone else will be
sympathetic enough to help you with whatever it is you're trying to
accomplish.

We return you now to our regular scheduled discussions with my
apologies for this brief interruption.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:02 PM
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie


"Jeff Liebermann" <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote in message
news:77h9a3p92gc9ancc4uu8pja0anc5fahm7p@4ax.com...
> However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you. I
> judge people by their willingness and ability to learn. Helping such
> people is why I spend an inordinate amount of time answering questions
> in newsgroups and mailing lists. When someone shows an inability or
> unwillingness to absorb information and digest it into knowledge, I
> ignore them. If I think there's some hope, sometimes I snarl at them.
> In your case, it's not even worth my effort snarling. Your inability
> to formulate an intelligible question, inability to stay focused, your
> repetitious behavior, and failure to appreciate my humor, marks you as
> a loser, unworthy of my limited time.
>
> So, go away. Do some reading on basic electronics, communications
> theory, compression techniques, established practices, standards,
> tact, diplomacy, and usenet etiquette. When you've done all this,
> reformulate your questions into an organized form that can be answered
> without guesswork or a Ouija board. Then, MAYBE someone else will be
> sympathetic enough to help you with whatever it is you're trying to
> accomplish.



Jeff, with your permission, I'll quote that now and again on the usegroup
where I'm the donor of " inordinate amount of time answering questions in
newsgroups and mailing lists."

<G>
LLoyd


Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:07 PM
Phil Carmody
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

[comp.compression removed]

Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> writes:
> Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> hath wroth:
> However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you.


If your repeated replying to him is "ignoring" him, then please
stop "ignoring" him.

Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 09:58 PM
Geoff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie

Radium wrote:
> On Jul 19, 12:06 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote in
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...e614fe3?hl=en&
>>

>
>> Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> hath wroth:

>
>>> On Jul 1, 7:24 am, shawn.cormi...@gmail.com wrote in
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...sg/696d6abf90c...

>
>>>> how would u like to change the cell phone industry?

>
>>> Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
>>> start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less
>>> and a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz.

>
>> Very roughly, the current 8Kbits/sec encoding rate,
>> compared to your 44Kbit/sec, will only handle about 1/5th the number
>> of users.

>
> Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
>
> Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?
> Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec?



Radium, please take your meds.

We are all very sorry for you and your Aspergers Syndrome, but you really
aren't out to make it easy for yourself or anybody else, are you ?.

geoff



Reply With Quote
Reply


« Please respond with reasonable answers -- how I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry. | Samsung SCH-A870 »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45