LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 ?

Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870
? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have
narrowed the choice to those three. All are basic tri-mode flip-phones
with bluetooth. I'm only interested in the phone functionality (call
quality, reception, battery life, durability, annoyances, etc.) and
don't care, for example, how well the cameras work.

I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more
than one of these and what they like or don't like about them.

<banjerbob@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163479253.754149.77570@h48g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870
> ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have
> narrowed the choice to those three. All are basic tri-mode flip-phones
> with bluetooth. I'm only interested in the phone functionality (call
> quality, reception, battery life, durability, annoyances, etc.) and
> don't care, for example, how well the cameras work.
>
> I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more
> than one of these and what they like or don't like about them.
>

I work for an Authorized Agent in ND, and I would have to vote for the
V325i. We currently sell all three models and use the VX5300 for our demo
phone at our second location, but I would still stick with the Moto. I have
not tried the new i model with bluetooth, but if they didn't screw up the
phone adding it, I would say go for it. I base my decision on your
functionality requirements.

ShackAttack

banjerbob@gmail.com wrote:
> Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870
> ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have
> narrowed the choice to those three. All are basic tri-mode flip-phones
> with bluetooth. I'm only interested in the phone functionality (call
> quality, reception, battery life, durability, annoyances, etc.) and
> don't care, for example, how well the cameras work.
>
> I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more
> than one of these and what they like or don't like about them.
>

I have had the 870 for 2 months. Other than it getting warm after 20
minutes it has been better than the Moto V265 I had. Also, it does not
have the antenna sticking up! I have not tried voice dialing etc. But
the screen, including number dialed, is easy to read. Reception has
been very good.
I think you need to try each anyway.

Lou

banjerbob@gmail.com wrote:

> Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870
> ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have
> narrowed the choice to those three. All are basic tri-mode flip-phones
> with bluetooth. I'm only interested in the phone functionality (call
> quality, reception, battery life, durability, annoyances, etc.) and
> don't care, for example, how well the cameras work.
>
> I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more
> than one of these and what they like or don't like about them.
>

I have the v325i , my g/f has the vx5300 & a buddy has the the Samsung
model.While all have BT that work's about the same neither the LG or
Samsung come close to the v325's reception.

If they come out pretty much equal re what options they have & your
needs...go with the v325i.

--