On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:25:15 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in
<jgkeegan-4BC017.18251519072007@individual.net>:
>In article <elmop-8A8F81.17230819072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>,
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <jgkeegan-B5FAAA.18032118072007@individual.net>,
>> "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > actually john, you owe the groups an apology.
>>
>> It'll never happen.
True. Nothing to apologize for.
>> Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
Utter nonsense.
>> One can only hope.
>
>until this incident, i thought he was just one of those limited types
>who held dearly to beliefs and rejected facts. but now that i have
>seen him intentionally lie .... not just misrepresent, but lie
>repeatedly ....
More utter nonsense.
>he has lost all credibility.
Actually just fine, but thanks for your concern.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:23:49 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
<elmop-02F5B2.17234919072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>:
>In article <3oCdnZ-q9uNPFQPbnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@adelphia.com>,
> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>
>> "Kevin Weaver" <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:23uni.23250
>> $Rw1.14734@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net:
>>
>> > What he will say is "Rubbish" I'm sure.
>> >
>> > "Scott" <how.do@you.do> wrote in message
>> > news:f9OdnTTtmsN0_APbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>> >> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>> >> news:2vns93d0ljbn5h68e1qb5c67cr5mlvtfe4@4ax.com:
>> >>
>> >>> No matter what you may claim, there are no such facts.
>> >> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/20...n-iphone_x.htm
>> >>
>> >> Now shut up and go away.
>>
>> Actually, he won't say anything. He avoids the truth at all costs. My
>> post was a thread killer for him. I'll simply keep the link handy (one of
>> many) for the next time he tries to paint a different picture of the
>> situation.
>
>Plainly, USA Today are nothing but socialist liars.
USA Today is crappy "journalism", in this case just repeating spin from
Verizon. Not terribly surprising that this hasn't been confirmed by
credible sources like NYT, WP, and/or WSJ.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
In article <vdsv93pc83s1qcdh7lldnn0461hltevir2@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:25:15 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
> <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in
> <jgkeegan-4BC017.18251519072007@individual.net>:
>
> >In article <elmop-8A8F81.17230819072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>,
> > "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <jgkeegan-B5FAAA.18032118072007@individual.net>,
> >> "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > actually john, you owe the groups an apology.
> >>
> >> It'll never happen.
>
> True. Nothing to apologize for.
>
> >> Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
>
> Utter nonsense.
>
> >> One can only hope.
> >
> >until this incident, i thought he was just one of those limited types
> >who held dearly to beliefs and rejected facts. but now that i have
> >seen him intentionally lie .... not just misrepresent, but lie
> >repeatedly ....
>
> More utter nonsense.
your whimpering response didn't refute a single fact.
> >he has lost all credibility.
>
> Actually just fine, but thanks for your concern.
i am not surprised that you are used to people noting that you have
no credibility.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:43:55 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <469f5c5a$0$27192$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Scott wrote:
>
>> Actually, he won't say anything. He avoids the truth at all costs. My
>> post was a thread killer for him. I'll simply keep the link handy (one of
>> many) for the next time he tries to paint a different picture of the
>> situation.
>
>Gee Scott, do you think anyone actually believes anything he posts
>anyway? ...
Pretty clear that they do, which I know really upsets you.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
newsrtv93ltun78638nvcmfqfqsocnpmq7l3u@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:43:55 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in <469f5c5a$0$27192$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
>>Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, he won't say anything. He avoids the truth at all costs. My
>>> post was a thread killer for him. I'll simply keep the link handy (one
>>> of
>>> many) for the next time he tries to paint a different picture of the
>>> situation.
>>
>>Gee Scott, do you think anyone actually believes anything he posts
>>anyway? ...
>
> Pretty clear that they do, which I know really upsets you.
>
WHO ?
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <jgkeegan-B5FAAA.18032118072007@individual.net>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <f9OdnTTtmsN0_APbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@adelphia.com>,
>> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>>
>>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>> news:2vns93d0ljbn5h68e1qb5c67cr5mlvtfe4@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> No matter what you may claim, there are no such facts.
>>>
>>> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/20...n-iphone_x.htm
>>>
>>> Now shut up and go away.
>>
>> actually john, you owe the groups an apology.
>
> It'll never happen.
>
> Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
Yes, even though I've had him kill-filed for a long time, I can always
tell when he disappears for a long time, as the responses to his
misinformation also disappear. It seems that whenever he gets caught
lying in such a clear way, he lays low for a while.
I wonder what he hopes to achieve by lying about why and when Verizon
turned down the iPhone. He should be thrilled that Cingular was able to
snag it for themselves, as it should really help them with new additions.
In article <46a00fd7$0$27206$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> > In article <jgkeegan-B5FAAA.18032118072007@individual.net>,
> > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <f9OdnTTtmsN0_APbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@adelphia.com>,
> >> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
> >>
> >>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
> >>> news:2vns93d0ljbn5h68e1qb5c67cr5mlvtfe4@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>>> No matter what you may claim, there are no such facts.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/20...n-iphone_x.htm
> >>>
> >>> Now shut up and go away.
> >>
> >> actually john, you owe the groups an apology.
> >
> > It'll never happen.
> >
> > Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
>
> Yes, even though I've had him kill-filed for a long time, I can always
> tell when he disappears for a long time, as the responses to his
> misinformation also disappear. It seems that whenever he gets caught
> lying in such a clear way, he lays low for a while.
>
> I wonder what he hopes to achieve by lying about why and when Verizon
> turned down the iPhone. He should be thrilled that Cingular was able to
> snag it for themselves, as it should really help them with new additions.
he still hasn't acknowledged his lie. in fact, he is still in the
denial stage, which is both fascinating and disturbing.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
In article <vdsv93pc83s1qcdh7lldnn0461hltevir2@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:25:15 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
> <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in
> <jgkeegan-4BC017.18251519072007@individual.net>:
>
> >In article <elmop-8A8F81.17230819072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>,
> > "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <jgkeegan-B5FAAA.18032118072007@individual.net>,
> >> "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > actually john, you owe the groups an apology.
> >>
> >> It'll never happen.
>
> True. Nothing to apologize for.
>
> >> Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
>
> Utter nonsense.
>
> >> One can only hope.
> >
> >until this incident, i thought he was just one of those limited types
> >who held dearly to beliefs and rejected facts. but now that i have
> >seen him intentionally lie .... not just misrepresent, but lie
> >repeatedly ....
>
> More utter nonsense.
>
> >he has lost all credibility.
>
> Actually just fine, but thanks for your concern.
John Navas wrote:
>> Plainly, USA Today are nothing but socialist liars.
[Cough}
> USA Today is crappy "journalism", in this case just repeating spin from
> Verizon. Not terribly surprising that this hasn't been confirmed by
> credible sources like NYT, WP, and/or WSJ.
Actually New York Times did cover it, but it required a subscription and I
didn't pursue the article enough to quote it.
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:4lsv93p194u4auvl73n46ie8d2mrovfv6u@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:23:49 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
> <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
> <elmop-02F5B2.17234919072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>:
>
>>In article <3oCdnZ-q9uNPFQPbnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@adelphia.com>,
>> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>>
>>> "Kevin Weaver" <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>>> news:23uni.23250 $Rw1.14734@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net:
>>>
>>> > What he will say is "Rubbish" I'm sure.
>>> >
>>> > "Scott" <how.do@you.do> wrote in message
>>> > news:f9OdnTTtmsN0_APbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>>> >> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>> >> news:2vns93d0ljbn5h68e1qb5c67cr5mlvtfe4@4ax.com:
>>> >>
>>> >>> No matter what you may claim, there are no such facts.
>>> >> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/20...n-iphone_x.htm
>>> >>
>>> >> Now shut up and go away.
>>>
>>> Actually, he won't say anything. He avoids the truth at all costs.
>>> My post was a thread killer for him. I'll simply keep the link
>>> handy (one of many) for the next time he tries to paint a different
>>> picture of the situation.
>>
>>Plainly, USA Today are nothing but socialist liars.
>
> USA Today is crappy "journalism", in this case just repeating spin
> from Verizon. Not terribly surprising that this hasn't been confirmed
> by credible sources like NYT, WP, and/or WSJ.
>
Crap- I should have bet somebody that he would say this.
Okay, Johnny, I'll find a few more for ya'- there are hundreds of articles.
Maybe I'll go back and find some fo the rags, blogs and forwign websites
you've used in the past. I'm sure all of them have weighed in on the
subject. Maybe a WSJ article is in order as well.
In article <46a0b74e$0$27222$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
> > he still hasn't acknowledged his lie. in fact, he is still in the
> > denial stage, which is both fascinating and disturbing.
>
> I could easily list 100 of his lies, so I don't think it's too
> fascinating. At to disturbing, don't let Usenet trolls and spammers
> disturb you.
that's probably good advice.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:29:43 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <46a00fd7$0$27206$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Last time he was outed like this, he left for a couple or three months.
>
>Yes, even though I've had him kill-filed for a long time, I can always
>tell when he disappears for a long time, as the responses to his
>misinformation also disappear. It seems that whenever he gets caught
>lying in such a clear way, he lays low for a while.
Hardly. LOL! It's just that (unlike you) I have a life, and this is a
busy time of year for me -- we're prepping for the Big Boat Series.
>I wonder what he hopes to achieve by lying about why and when Verizon
>turned down the iPhone. ...
The lie is yours (and you know it).
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
Re: Why iPhone for Cingular Only? 
rtv93ltun78638nvcmfqfqsocnpmq7l3u@4ax.com...
Linear Mode
