Can someone explain why I get better results in 3D Mark 03's sound
benchmark when I use DDR2 RAM instead of DDR1?
The mainboard can take both DDR1 and DDR2 (not at the same time though).
I've run the test with DDR1 (@200 MHz, timings 3-3-3-7 2T) a few
times. Then with DDR2 (@266 MHz, timings 4-4-4-12 2T). Every single
time the sound test was much faster with DDR2.
FSB was the same each time (271MHz). The FSB/DDR ratio is 1:1 in the
case of DDR2, and 4:3 for DDR1. RAM timings weren't "pushed"; the
modules are rated for those timings.
Specs
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.439MHz
GPU: ATI X1950XT 512MB GDDR3 PCIe
Mainboard: Asrock 4CoreDual-VSTA (Chipset: VIA 880 Ultra)
DDR1 RAM: 2x1 GB Kingston Value RAM PC-3200 (400MHZ)
DDR2 RAM: 2x1 GB Corsair XMS2 DHX PC2-6400 (800MHZ) CL4 Dual Channel Kit
(Part number: TWIN2X2048-6400C4DHX)
Sound card: Sound Blaster Live 24-bit PCI
Screenshot of DDR1 results:
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/2417/ddr1dx3.png
Screenshot of DDR2 results:
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/8541/ddr2vj7.png
I'm scratching my head why I get better results in a test that has
nothing to do with RAM whatsoever ?:/