Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.comp.hardware
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:33 AM
Maureen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Network Adaptor Card versus USB Network Adaptor

Is the Card faster than the USB adaptor? I know the card is cheaper,
probably because installation is a little trickier, but what about
performance?

Thanks!

Maureen


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:23 AM
GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Network Adaptor Card versus USB Network Adaptor

"Maureen" <no@spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:12vush1iidoct49@news.supernews.com...
> Is the Card faster than the USB adaptor? I know the card is cheaper,
> probably because installation is a little trickier, but what about
> performance?


If you are talking about a wireless card, then performance won't matter
between internal PCI card and USB 'dongle' - both interfaces are way faster
than any wireless device (assuming USB2). I have an internal PCI card, but
actually prefer USB as you can move it between machines and you can put it
on the end of a USB extension cable, so the reception is not obstructed by
the metal case on the PC.

If you are talking about a wired network adaptor, then I haven't seen and
USB ones, so can't comment.



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:10 AM
pen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Network Adaptor Card versus USB Network Adaptor

"GT" <ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45ffb589$0$17257$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> "Maureen" <no@spam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:12vush1iidoct49@news.supernews.com...
>> Is the Card faster than the USB adaptor? I know the card is cheaper,
>> probably because installation is a little trickier, but what about
>> performance?

>
> If you are talking about a wireless card, then performance won't matter
> between internal PCI card and USB 'dongle' - both interfaces are way
> faster than any wireless device (assuming USB2). I have an internal PCI
> card, but actually prefer USB as you can move it between machines and you
> can put it on the end of a USB extension cable, so the reception is not
> obstructed by the metal case on the PC.
>
> If you are talking about a wired network adaptor, then I haven't seen and
> USB ones, so can't comment.
>


For wired cards it also makes no speed difference. The USB one are somewhat
delicate and can be easily damaged, but they are more convenient to install.


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:37 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Network Adaptor Card versus USB Network Adaptor

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:33:21 -0000, no@spam.invalid
(Maureen) wrote:

>Is the Card faster than the USB adaptor? I know the card is cheaper,
>probably because installation is a little trickier, but what about
>performance?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Maureen


The card is cheaper mainly because USB is considered a
"novelty". The difference in cost to make it is negligable,
but then there's also that they sell in lower volme because
most OEMs and businesses want the PCI type - if not for more
recent motherboards where it is embedded. This is assuming
wired type instead of wireless.

If your motherboard only has USB1.1, the USB adapter will be
slower, significalty so for filesharing on a lan, though the
*average* US internet service will still be just under the
peak such an adapter can provide, and the realized
throughput typical of such a service (due to remote system
or internet pipe congestion in general) will be even further
lower than USB1.1 can provide.

With USB2 it depends on whether your adapter is USB1 or 2,
most anything newer generation is USB2 but there are some
old parts out there somewhere... and if your USB2 port-pair
has another USB device plugged in you may have some latency
from the bandwidth sharing of the two USB devices if used
simultaneously.

In general a PCI card is a little faster, lower latency and
also a little lower system overhead by avoiding USB. As
mentioned above, general internet or email usage wouldn't
make much difference, you'd have to have significant data
moving to see a difference and even then it might take a
benchmark to reveal it much.

As for wireless adapters, the other issue is where the
antenna is and what quality it is. With a typical USB
adapter the antenna is just a small trace on the interal
circuit board, which is inferior to the type on a PCI card,
but being USB, it can be positioned better on a USB
extension cable without the losses associated with putting a
PCI card's antenna on an extension cable. So some people
may get better wifi speed with a PC card and others with
USB, depending on their environment as well as depending on
the particular product chosen.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WiMAX Forum News, Weekly Clip Report March 22-29, 2007 badger_b@hotmail.com alt.internet.wireless 0 03-31-2007 01:14 AM
Don't fall victim to the 'Free Wi-Fi' scam Ablang alt.internet.wireless 5 02-04-2007 08:44 AM
Force WZC with Linksys Wireless-G Compact USB network adaptor Mark alt.internet.wireless 0 09-20-2006 01:22 PM
[Job] Network Engineer - San Jose, CA toprecruiter alt.internet.wireless 2 10-20-2005 01:34 PM
Surecom EP-9321 802.11g 54Mbps PCI Wireless Network Adaptor coolmhz Hardware Discussion 4 10-02-2003 07:14 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45