Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.comp.hardware
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 09:50 PM
GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default new graphics card

I asked a graphics card question the other day and we all got side-tracked a
little, but when I asked a side question, it was missed...

Is there anywhere (web?) that has a comparrisson table for graphics cards
both old and new? All the comparisson tables compare cards of a simaler era
using games of the time, nothing compares the generations directly.

I want to know how much faster a newer card would be compared to my AGP 64MB
Radeon 8500. Is is worth me upgrading at all? How much would it cost me to
be able to run some modern games - Area 51 + car racing Sims for example.
With our new baby arriving, I don't have spare cash for the PC any more, but
Area 51 struggles even at 640x480 sometimes!! I'm not bothered about
anti-aliasing or the other anti-thing, I just want good frame rates at
1024x768 or even better, 1280x1024 in games such as Area 51.

What do I buy for under £100, preferably nearer £50??



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 11:26 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:50:40 +0100, "GT"
<ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I asked a graphics card question the other day and we all got side-tracked a
>little, but when I asked a side question, it was missed...
>
>Is there anywhere (web?) that has a comparrisson table for graphics cards
>both old and new? All the comparisson tables compare cards of a simaler era
>using games of the time, nothing compares the generations directly.


Tom's Hardware vga charts
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/vga_charts.html

That's about as good as it gets.
You may not find good comparisions of very old to newer
cards because the comparisons aren't applicable. Old cards
won't even run new games and new cards are optimized for
newer DIrectX effects, not just linear framerate increases
like old generations of cards. On other words, (I'll invent
fictional numbers for this example:) a Radeon 8500 might be
40% as fast as a Geforce 6800 at a 5 year old game, but only
10% as fast at a new game.


>
>I want to know how much faster a newer card would be compared to my AGP 64MB
>Radeon 8500. Is is worth me upgrading at all?


If you are not a gamer, no it's pointless to upgrade.

If you are a gamer, you should already know quite clearly
that Radeon 8500 can't even play new games at playable
framerates. So, for modern 3D gaming, yes it is manditory to
upgrade the card.


>How much would it cost me to
>be able to run some modern games - Area 51 + car racing Sims for example.


You could spend $80 and then wish you'd spent more 1 year
from now if not 2 months later? Frankly the best value is
around $150, find a deal on a Geforce 6800 (not LE and not
GT). If you can't find one around that price, look at
Geforce 6600GT, or regular 6600 even cheaper.

However, with that old card I wonder what the rest of your
system is like. If it's as old as the card, you'll need a
newer system to reap most of the benefit from a new card.


>With our new baby arriving, I don't have spare cash for the PC any more, but
>Area 51 struggles even at 640x480 sometimes!! I'm not bothered about
>anti-aliasing or the other anti-thing, I just want good frame rates at
>1024x768 or even better, 1280x1024 in games such as Area 51.
>
>What do I buy for under £100, preferably nearer £50??



Radeon 9600 Pro? Depends, if your CPU isn't modern and you
don't have at least 512MB+ system memory, you ought to hold
onto the $$ till later.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:35 AM
GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

I just don't know what to pick, but I need more graphics power on the
smallest budget I can get away with. Can anyone say if these cards would be
significantly faster than my 64MB 8500 at modern games (Area51)?

Club3D Radeon 9600, 256MB DDR, 128bit
Sapphire RADEON 9550 - 256 MB
Club FX5200-256

Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
difference?



Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:36 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:35:48 +0100, "GT"
<ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I just don't know what to pick, but I need more graphics power on the
>smallest budget I can get away with. Can anyone say if these cards would be
>significantly faster than my 64MB 8500 at modern games (Area51)?
>
>Club3D Radeon 9600, 256MB DDR, 128bit
>Sapphire RADEON 9550 - 256 MB
>Club FX5200-256
>
>Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
>difference?
>


You did not mention your system so we have no way to know
where your bottleneck is. Without knowing that, it's
impossible to project how much benefit any of the above
cards will provide.

Ignoring that, yes the above cards will be a significant
improvement, the Radeon 9600 is better than FX5200. If you
want nVidia, go for at least a 6600.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:43 PM
Cuzman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

GT wrote:

" Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
difference? "


Forget 256MB cards; You'll be paying more for a card that has slower
RAM. 128MB equivalents will cost you less, and have faster RAM chips.

You can have this from me for £40 (including recorded delivery):

*** MSI GEFORCE FX5700-TD128 (128MB AGP8x) ***

Original box, complete with...
- DVI-to-VGA adapter
- TV-out lead
- Manual

Software bundle includes...
- MSI Multimedia Beyond 3D
- MSI 3D Desktop
- MSI Media Center Deluxe II
- VirtualDrive Professional
- RestoreIT! Professional
- InterVideo WinDVD 5.1 channel
- Supreme Foreign Language Learning Machine

Games bundle includes...
- Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project
- Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon
- The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind
- Games Collection: 7-in-1 (Demos)

The fan shows no sign of wearing / giving-up.

Product on MSI website. http://tinyurl.com/bbbtu
Comparison of FX5700 128MB and other cards. http://tinyurl.com/69nj3



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 03:34 PM
GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:atppd1tefmncbo0563hktri9a7l7erove1@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:35:48 +0100, "GT"
> <ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I just don't know what to pick, but I need more graphics power on the
>>smallest budget I can get away with. Can anyone say if these cards would
>>be
>>significantly faster than my 64MB 8500 at modern games (Area51)?
>>
>>Club3D Radeon 9600, 256MB DDR, 128bit
>>Sapphire RADEON 9550 - 256 MB
>>Club FX5200-256
>>
>>Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
>>difference?

>
> You did not mention your system so we have no way to know
> where your bottleneck is. Without knowing that, it's
> impossible to project how much benefit any of the above
> cards will provide.


Sorry - didn't think to do that. I think its the graphics card that is
struggling, but how would anyone else know if I don't tell you the rest! I
have an XP2500, 2GB PC2700 (swap file forced to none), Samsung 160GB HD and
my trusty old 64MB radeon 8500. All games are fine except for the most
recent. The game that has sparked my interest in upgrading my graphics is
Area 51. I just recently got SCAR and it plays almost smoothly at 1600x1200
with 'depth of field' and 'cubic environment' turned off.



Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 04:04 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:34:42 +0100, "GT"
<ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:


>Sorry - didn't think to do that. I think its the graphics card that is
>struggling, but how would anyone else know if I don't tell you the rest! I
>have an XP2500, 2GB PC2700 (swap file forced to none), Samsung 160GB HD and
>my trusty old 64MB radeon 8500. All games are fine except for the most
>recent. The game that has sparked my interest in upgrading my graphics is
>Area 51. I just recently got SCAR and it plays almost smoothly at 1600x1200
>with 'depth of field' and 'cubic environment' turned off.
>



Yes your video card is by far the largest bottleneck and you
would gain significantly from replacing it.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 04:48 PM
GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

"Cuzman" <cuzNOSPAM@supanet.com> wrote in message
news:dbisie$u1g$1@news.freedom2surf.net...
> GT wrote:
>
> " Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
> difference? "
>
>
> Forget 256MB cards; You'll be paying more for a card that has slower RAM.
> 128MB equivalents will cost you less, and have faster RAM chips.
>
> You can have this from me for £40 (including recorded delivery):
>
> *** MSI GEFORCE FX5700-TD128 (128MB AGP8x) ***


Thanks for the offer, but I think I am going to go for Radeon (9600 Pro/Xt
or 9800 Pro/XT). I prefer radeon over NVidia and I have a radeon card now so
it should be easier to upgrade!



Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 06:14 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: new graphics card

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:48:41 +0100, "GT"
<ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"Cuzman" <cuzNOSPAM@supanet.com> wrote in message
>news:dbisie$u1g$1@news.freedom2surf.net...
>> GT wrote:
>>
>> " Are they be in a different league, or would I not really notice a
>> difference? "
>>
>>
>> Forget 256MB cards; You'll be paying more for a card that has slower RAM.
>> 128MB equivalents will cost you less, and have faster RAM chips.
>>
>> You can have this from me for £40 (including recorded delivery):
>>
>> *** MSI GEFORCE FX5700-TD128 (128MB AGP8x) ***

>
>Thanks for the offer, but I think I am going to go for Radeon (9600 Pro/Xt
>or 9800 Pro/XT). I prefer radeon over NVidia and I have a radeon card now so
>it should be easier to upgrade!
>



Being a Radeon it may even be harder than an nVidia (or any
other) card, not easier. ATI drivers are piss-poor when it
comes to uninstalling so if anything it's harder to switch
to same family of card because there might be mixed driver
remnants left behind. Uninstall the old driver before
putting the new card in then manually set standard VGA mode.
If that isn't enough then Google for an "ATI driver
cleaner".

If it weren't that nVidia's FX5xxx series is slower in your
price range, (that is, if your budget were higher) I'd have
suggested nVidia cards for driver issues/prevention alone.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Graphic's Card Questions Harry alt.comp.hardware 25 03-17-2007 04:27 PM
problems with graphics card raja2281 Troubleshooting 0 12-21-2006 02:29 PM
Recommendations for graphics card The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan alt.comp.hardware 5 12-01-2006 06:40 PM
Do I just need a new graphics card? Travis alt.comp.hardware 3 08-24-2006 01:53 PM
Re: Is this graphics card any good? GrimJack808 alt.comp.hardware 0 08-20-2006 09:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45