Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.comp.hardware
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2005, 07:36 PM
syklab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Performance on Synology DS-101+

I just bought a new DS-101+ and trying to set it up as a lan disk to
store all my DIVX, RMVB movies and play them thru the lan disk. The
DS-101+ is connecting to the boardband router via lan cable directly.
My other PCs are connected to the lan via wireless G lan card . The
performance is really bad, anyone experience similar thing using lan
disk? Any solution to this?

Thanks

--
Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/Genera...pict59646.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=301804

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2005, 08:38 PM
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Performance on Synology DS-101+

On 29 Jul 2005 14:36:05 -0400, syklab
<UseLinkToEmail@HardwareForumz.com> wrote:

>I just bought a new DS-101+ and trying to set it up as a lan disk to
>store all my DIVX, RMVB movies and play them thru the lan disk. The
>DS-101+ is connecting to the boardband router via lan cable directly.
>My other PCs are connected to the lan via wireless G lan card . The
>performance is really bad, anyone experience similar thing using lan
>disk? Any solution to this?
>
>Thanks



Connect a system direct to the wired lan, not wirelessly.
Only then can you have an idea how the DS-101 is doing.

Generally speaking, wireless is poor for any higher
bandwidth activity, or even moderately low bandwidth for
that matter. It won't ever get close to 54mbps due to misc
overheads in the wifi in addtion to TCP/IP overhead- you
could Google for a list of reasons why but at this point
it'd be most useful to bench it using a wired connection.

The ultimate solution? String the wire. Even a perfectly
working wireless G will be less than 35% as fast but more
importantly, subject to hiccups, interrupted data which
isn't so good for realtime activities like video.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HPSBGN02187 SSRT061280 rev.1 - Mercury LoadRunner, Performance Center, Monitor over Firewall, Remote Unauthenticated Arbitrary Code Execution Security Alert comp.security.misc 0 02-08-2007 10:06 PM
Page file Jaap Telschouw alt.comp.hardware 59 01-24-2007 07:34 PM
Bad 2 GB Flash Drive Performance JB alt.comp.hardware 5 12-25-2006 02:31 PM
Better performance: Athalon XP 3200+ or Intel Duo T2300? Liam alt.comp.hardware 4 07-30-2006 03:04 AM
Upgrade Report [Reinvent Your PC: Performance Boosters - 07/12/2005] Ablang alt.comp.hardware 0 07-14-2005 04:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45