Replacing parts on a HP pavillon

kony <spam@spam.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> kony <spam@spam.com> wrote
>>> visions of effty <impeach_the_shrub@verizon.net> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> visions of effty <impeach_the_shrub@verizon.net> wrote

>>>>>> The intention with Vista is to make a Windows license
>>>>>> non-transferable through an upgrade of the motherboard.
>>>>>> http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49364

>>>>> That isnt legally sustainable in any country with a decent legal system.
>>>>> And clearly doesnt even apply to the REPAIR being discussed anyway.

>>>> Okay, here's the point though. Microsoft wants to define a new
>>>> computer as a new motherboard for the most common licensing
>>>> arrangement,

>>> ... pretty big leap, why assume that unless explicitly
>>> written? Remember, nobody and I mean nobody (short
>>> of a court), can redefine the terms of your EULA after the
>>> license has been paid for and it has been accepted.

> Wrong. You're always welcome to work out what isnt legally
> enforceable and make an obscene gesture in MS's general direction.

> yes Rod, we already know you're in a generally disagreeable mood but you've
> spewed so much BS recently, it just isn't worth coddling your comments.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

No surprise that you got the bums rush, right out the door.