Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.comp.hardware
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2005, 12:44 PM
Nik Simms (Web Developer)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default SATA 2

Has anyone bought, used a sata 2 drive?

Are they any better than the sata 1 drives. I read an article that suggest
they are not that much different in speed.
--
Nik
http://www.pc-gear.co.uk


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:15 PM
Jamie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SATA 2

Isn't the main difference a clip on the connector and NCQ?



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:59 PM
John McGaw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SATA 2

Nik Simms (Web Developer) wrote:
> Has anyone bought, used a sata 2 drive?
>
> Are they any better than the sata 1 drives. I read an article that suggest
> they are not that much different in speed.


A real SATA II drive should be much faster than a SATA I -- but only for
the length of time that it takes to empty the buffer. And 8-16mb of data
moves by very very quickly. After that the data flow is controlled
completely by the rate it can move to/from the spinning disk and even a
relatively slow PATA interface can keep up with that pretty well. So
what is left? Well, native command queuing is nice but for most people
and on a single-user system the effect will be pretty subtle (not to
mention that some SATA I drives have it and some SATA II drives
apparently don't!). I'm sure that some day data density will get to the
point where it can saturate a SATA I interface but that will probably be
a matter of years and then SATA II will really be necessary to maintain
the data flow.

Not specifically on-topic but this is an interesting article about the
obfuscation being practiced in the hard drive industry:

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2450

--
John McGaw
[Knoxville, TN, USA]
http://johnmcgaw.com

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2005, 04:18 AM
DevilsPGD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SATA 2

In message <8ax1f.105514$Ph4.3211713@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> "Jamie"
<jamieivany@nf.sympatico.ca> wrote:

>Isn't the main difference a clip on the connector and NCQ?
>


NCQ is part of SATA and doesn't require SATA-II, it just needs a drive
with NCQ as part of the chip.

--
I should have gotten off in crackton
-- Lisa

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SATA RAID Dilemma smackedass alt.comp.hardware 11 04-07-2007 02:15 PM
Installing 1 SATA HDD Mattrixx alt.comp.hardware 15 01-04-2007 09:54 AM
SATA with IDE - my experiences of it jameshanley39@yahoo.co.uk alt.comp.hardware 0 01-03-2007 08:27 PM
Problem with SATA 300 Seagate Drives....! Starz_Kid alt.comp.hardware 5 08-20-2006 12:34 AM
Mobile Rack Removable Drive With SATA Power Connector? Onideus Mad Hatter alt.comp.hardware 8 08-17-2006 09:29 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45