SATA faster than PATA?

Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?

Thanks

Jethro

"Jethro" <Wilson@somewhere.org> wrote in message
news:9u39t2tjqron8ah3vcvtjivh99prilecec@4ax.com...
> Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jethro

PATA 66/100/133MBs

SATA 150/300MBs

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:51:38 -0000, "Lez Pawl"
<Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote:

>
>"Jethro" <Wilson@somewhere.org> wrote in message
>news:9u39t2tjqron8ah3vcvtjivh99prilecec@4ax.com.. .
>> Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jethro
>
>PATA 66/100/133MBs
>
>SATA 150/300MBs
>

Thanks for response and for tolerating my laziness. I probably should
have googled the subject. You saved me time.

Jethro

Jethro <Wilson@somewhere.org> wrote:

> Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives?

No, not when the same drive is available in those two formats.

> If so, why?

The speed of the drive is determined by the physical characteristics, the
rotation rate, sectors per track and seek times, not the interface speed.

SATA drives are faster by a little bit, because they are newer technology
and were designed that way.

DaveW

"Jethro" <Wilson@somewhere.org> wrote in message
news:9u39t2tjqron8ah3vcvtjivh99prilecec@4ax.com...
> Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jethro

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:53:57 GMT, Jethro
<Wilson@somewhere.org> wrote:

>Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?
>
>Thanks
>
>Jethro


You'd have to consider two specific drives, sometimes PATA
drives are faster than SATA, though usually SATA's
marginally faster bus makes for a slight increase, and NCQ
can too in some multi-access request scenarios.

The specific drive used is far more important and some only
come in SATA, like WD Raptors.

>Are SATA drives faster than PATA drives? If so, why?

Marginally perhaps.. Yes SATA is a much faster bus, but if the drive can't
supply data faster than 133MB/s anyway then it doesn't make much
difference..

Chris