On Wed, 7 May 2008 19:37:13 -0700 (PDT),
"void.no.spam.com@gmail.com" <void.no.spam.com@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Yes it's slower than some, but that seems about right for
>> the low end drives with MLC flash chips, the ones typically
>> costing about $40 USD /8GB these days. *Many other drives
>> would have about the same performance at similar price
>> points.
>
>Yeah that's exactly how much it cost! It's an A-Data PD30 drive.
>It's designed with a built-in cover, so you can't lose any caps.
>Although is the cap really that important? I see so many reviews
>where people are concerned about losing their caps.
I haven't lost any caps in a long time, but I would want
either a cap or a retractable so pocket lint and various
other small things like screws don't get lodged inside. I
would assume I'd notice a screw in one, but admittedly I
never check (partly because I have a cap on it).
>
>>
>> As you've noted, small files take quite a bit longer. *You
>> might consider putting everything in a zip file writing it
>> to the USB drive as the destination to speed it up a little,
>> or of course return that drive for another that's faster...
>> which for 8GB would tend to cost about twice as much though
>> sometimes the higher priced drives have rebates to lower
>> cost a little.
>
>Which brands or models are you thinking of?
Check a few at Newegg, those with good speeds carry a speed
rating as it is a predominant feature justifying (to some
buyers) the price. I glanced at newegg and didn't see as
many in 8GB size as I expected, a Patriot XT
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820220252
and a very overpriced Kingston
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820134616
I'm not sure if Newegg decided not to carry the faster ones
or there's just a lag in them being introduced in 8GB
models. Since the flash drive market changes so fast, new
models introduced all the time, your best bet would be to
web search for some benchmarks. Tom's Hardware does a lot
of benchmarks of such things but I dont' know if they did
any recently.