What inkjet printer prints the best text?

"Tony" <tonythebengaltiger@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:part1of1.1.41sIbAVRYvpRWg@ue.ph...
(snipped - at Kony's request, and bottom posted per CBF's)

> So it is definitely goodbye from me and I fervently pray that it is
> goodbye
> from you.
> Tony

C'mon, Tony, you kindhearted, but misguided soul - You must know that Kony,
the snarling attack dog, always has to have the last, unpleasant word!

"Burt" <nospam@pacbell.net> wrote:
>"Tony" <tonythebengaltiger@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:part1of1.1.41sIbAVRYvpRWg@ue.ph...
>(snipped - at Kony's request, and bottom posted per CBF's)
>
>> So it is definitely goodbye from me and I fervently pray that it is
>> goodbye
>> from you.
>> Tony
>
>C'mon, Tony, you kindhearted, but misguided soul - You must know that Kony,
>the snarling attack dog, always has to have the last, unpleasant word!

You are of course correct Burt, he can have the last word with my compliments.
Tony

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:59:26 -0600, Tony
<tonythebengaltiger@gmail.com> wrote:

><snip>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok, your reply was noted and at this point it seems we've
>>>>beaten a dead horse long enough.
>>>
>>>
>>>Excellent, I am so pleased that you have seen reason.
>>>
>>>Tony
>>
>>Seen reason? You want to selectively excuse flaws without
>>consideration of the very real impact they may have. Sorry
>>but that's insane.
>>
>>Once you understand that, you will have "seen reason".
>
>Your response was predictable. Quod erat demonstrandum.
>Thank you for pointing out that your wisdom is greater than the combined wisdom
>of the entire human race, either alive today or who have ever lived.

More of your nonsense. The combined wisdom of the race is
to use evidence, plenty of which is available with a basic
google search about Vista user discontent, and abandonment.

Did OEMs backtrack and start providing WinME again after
WinXP? Did you address any of the links posted days ago or
attempt to avoid discussing them?

My "wisdom" is to look externally for evidence instead of
only taking a subjective view. To accept input from others
that do have problems. Certainly some don't have problems,
making it important to address the very information you want
to brush aside.



>Now that I
>understand that I will no longer bother you with my insignificant, trivial and
>rather pathetic contributions to this thread and will allow you to bask in the
>glory that you so richly deserve. I am humbled in your presence.

It's not about ego (or shouldn't be), it's about the issues
you chose to make light of, the _VISTA_ issues. It is a bit
amazing to me that there are actually people out there that
will do anything to avoid a factual discussion. WinXP, and
further precessors aren't perfect either, but only be
addressing the specifics - instead of ignoring them, can one
make a good choice. I know people who run Win98 fine for
example, but certainly it is a bad choice for many others...

Details, details, details. Avoidance is a choice.

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:53:15 GMT, "Burt"
<nospam@pacbell.net> wrote:

>
>"Tony" <tonythebengaltiger@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:part1of1.1.41sIbAVRYvpRWg@ue.ph...
>(snipped - at Kony's request, and bottom posted per CBF's)
>
>> So it is definitely goodbye from me and I fervently pray that it is
>> goodbye
>> from you.
>> Tony
>
>C'mon, Tony, you kindhearted, but misguided soul - You must know that Kony,
>the snarling attack dog, always has to have the last, unpleasant word!
>

You may be right, when it comes to someone insisting they're
right but choosing not to discuss details nor accept that
everyone's needs aren't the same. I do then tend to post
again, with the hope the other party will either retract
their position or provide supportive evidence instead of
blanket statements and hearsay. Whether it be retraction
or evidence, I would rather the latter than the former,
because it's about i n f o r m a t i o n.