Windows.XP Repairing

Windows XP tips and tricks. .Learn how to bypass very common
windows.problems, speed up your system and make it more reliable
with useful tips and tricks.

http://windowsxpsp2pro.blogspot.com

travolta005 wrote in message
news:1183679328.773804.173160@r34g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com...
> Windows XP tips and tricks. .Learn how to bypass very common
> windows.problems, speed up your system and make it more reliable
> with useful tips and tricks.
>
> http://windowsxpsp2pro. blogspot. com
>


No one needs to visit a spam site to figure out how to fix problems.

blogspot & gmail = havens for spammers

travolta005@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Windows XP tips and tricks. .Learn how to bypass very common
> windows.problems, speed up your system and make it more reliable
> with useful tips and tricks.

Try:

http://www.theeldergeek.com/

In article <v9idndF_BdnKDxDbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com>,
Vanguard <no@mail.invalid> wrote:
>travolta005 wrote in message
>news:1183679328.773804.173160@r34g2000hsd.googleg roups.com...
>> Windows XP tips and tricks...
>>
>> http://im-a-spamming-wanker-who-cros...s.blogspot.com
>
>No one needs to visit a spam site to figure out how to fix problems.

No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Scott Alfter wrote:

> No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
> delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

He did munge the URL, it is useless. BTW while you're spouting off
netiquette in both your message and your sig, you should use a sig sep

--
Trev
'95 900SS

Trevor Best wrote:
> Scott Alfter wrote:
>
> > No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and
> > either delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make
> > them useless.
>
> He did munge the URL, it is useless. BTW while you're spouting off
> netiquette in both your message and your sig, you should use a sig sep

Exactly! A sig delineator is a must for anyone who's going to talk
use-netiquette.
--
Shaun.

Scott Alfter wrote:
>
> In article <v9idndF_BdnKDxDbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Vanguard <no@mail.invalid> wrote:
> >travolta005 wrote in message
> >news:1183679328.773804.173160@r34g2000hsd.googleg roups.com...
> >> Windows XP tips and tricks...
> >>
> >> http://im-a-spamming-wanker-who-cros...s.blogspot.com
> >
> >No one needs to visit a spam site to figure out how to fix problems.
>
> No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
> delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

Even when you remove any references to the spam, you're still likely to be
labeled an idiot by our friend Mike Tomlinson. Best to support the spammers
and let them get away with it.

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen
<johs@sizefitter.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Best to support the spammers
>and let them get away with it.


What a ridiculous argument.

kony wrote:
>
> On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen
> <johs@sizefitter.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Best to support the spammers
> >and let them get away with it.
>
> What a ridiculous argument.

Read again. It was a sarcastic remark in the context of my post.

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage johannes <johs@size-nospam-fitter.com> wrote:


> kony wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen
>> <johs@sizefitter.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > Best to support the spammers
>> >and let them get away with it.
>>
>> What a ridiculous argument.

> Read again. It was a sarcastic remark in the context of my post.

Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Arno

"Arno Wagner" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:5fdlvvF3c8d65U5@mid.individual.net
> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage johannes <johs@size-nospam-fitter.com> wrote:
> > kony wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen <johs@sizefitter.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > Best to support the spammers
> > > > and let them get away with it.
> > >
> > > What a ridiculous argument.
>
> > Read again. It was a sarcastic remark in the context of my post.
>
> Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Maybe we should call you Nobody from now on then, babblebot.

>
> Arno

Arno Wagner wrote:
> Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Oh, you're obviously from the uk group this was posted to then.

(the above was sarcasm, starting to get it now are we? :-))

--
Trev
'95 900SS

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Trevor Best <newsreply@besty.org.uk> wrote:
> Arno Wagner wrote:
>> Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

> Oh, you're obviously from the uk group this was posted to then.

> (the above was sarcasm, starting to get it now are we? :-))

(Hint: My posting also was sarcasm... ;-)

Armp

"Arno Wagner" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:5fhhjjF3c6h54U5@mid.individual.net
> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Trevor Best <newsreply@besty.org.uk> wrote:
> > Arno Wagner wrote:
> > > Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...
>
> > Oh, you're obviously from the uk group this was posted to then.
>
> > (the above was sarcasm, starting to get it now are we? :-))

> (Hint: My posting also was sarcasm... ;-)

Right, so you're posting from the grave, babblebot.
That explains your round the clock posting. No sleep for the dead.

>
> Armp

What?

Folkert Rienstra wrote:

>"Arno Wagner" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Armp
>
>What?

Type "Arno" with your right hand one key to the right of where it
should be. 8)