computer forensics

On 11/09/2009 08:07, don wrote:
> What type of courses would I need to start taking to become a computer
> foresnics kindof person.
>
> Do colleges offer such courses.
>
> Any online available?
>
>

Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!

I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine
and got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-

http://www.google.com/search?client=...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

When you have explored just a few of these responses, you'll have a much
better idea of how best to proceed.

You might also benefit from reading here:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_forensics

I hope this helps!

--
Dave

What type of courses would I need to start taking to become a computer
foresnics kindof person.

Do colleges offer such courses.

Any online available?

On 12/09/2009 07:16, don wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!
>>
>> I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine and
>> got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-
>
> Actually your Google results is EXACTLY why I'm asking the question jerk.
>
> 1520000 hits is a bit to much to read......... I like first hand, up to
> date, personal experience opinions.
>
>
>

What you might like and what you get are no doubt two different things.

Perhaps the first thing you should learn is how best to be civil.

Goodbye!

>
> Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!
>
> I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine and
> got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-

Actually your Google results is EXACTLY why I'm asking the question jerk.

1520000 hits is a bit to much to read......... I like first hand, up to
date, personal experience opinions.

~BD~ wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 07:16, don wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!
>>>
>>> I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine
>>> and
>>> got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-
>>
>> Actually your Google results is EXACTLY why I'm asking the question jerk.
>>
>> 1520000 hits is a bit to much to read......... I like first hand, up to
>> date, personal experience opinions.
>>
>>
>>
>
> What you might like and what you get are no doubt two different things.
>
> Perhaps the first thing you should learn is how best to be civil.
>
> Goodbye!

Good point.

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:33:06 -0700, John Smith <nym@invalid.org>
wrote:

>~BD~ wrote:
>> On 12/09/2009 07:16, don wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!
>>>>
>>>> I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine
>>>> and
>>>> got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-
>>>
>>> Actually your Google results is EXACTLY why I'm asking the question jerk.
>>>
>>> 1520000 hits is a bit to much to read......... I like first hand, up to
>>> date, personal experience opinions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What you might like and what you get are no doubt two different things.
>>
>> Perhaps the first thing you should learn is how best to be civil.
>>
>> Goodbye!
>
>Good point.

Civility??

What are you trying to do? Ruin Usenet?

On 17/09/2009 09:12, jackt@who.cares.? wrote:
<snip>
>
> Civility??
>
> What are you trying to do? Ruin Usenet?

The Usenet Improvement Project is an attempt to make Usenet
participation a better experience for those who are clued as to what the
Usenet medium is and how to use it.

Explore here! http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/index.html

--
Dave (still trying to learn about this stuff!)

On 17/09/2009 08:33, John Smith wrote:
<snip>
>
> Good point.

Thanks!

Seems I was right too.
No others came forward to provide advice, did they? ;)

Dave

don wrote:
>> Perhaps you should start by learning how best Google may help you!
>>
>> I entered "computer forensics training" into the Google search engine and
>> got 1,520,000 responses, viz:-
>
> Actually your Google results is EXACTLY why I'm asking the question jerk.
>
> 1520000 hits is a bit to much to read......... I like first hand, up to
> date, personal experience opinions.
>
>
>