Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
getting users on encrypted Web services...
Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
Short of funds...
And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
Probably the one who gives me free...
This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
an encrypted option, hmm...
--
Tech, computer repair specialist (on the side), part time Tech
Pro poster to Wilders Security...home base...On usenet to help noobs
Not me...
> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>
> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>
> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>
> Short of funds...
>
> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>
> Probably the one who gives me free...
>
> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>
> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
> an encrypted option, hmm...
By the way to chronomatic,,,
....after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
much stomach? ;)
--
I want love and kisses and ponies in a field of ****ographic pleasure.
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>
>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>
>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>
>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>
>> Short of funds...
>>
>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>
>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>
>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>
>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>
> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>
> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
> much stomach? ;)
> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo...offers an encrypted option, hmm...
*LOL*
--
Passwords, people, they are not just for game shows. If you refuse to
make the effort to remember a few long, diverse passwords, then don't
scream at me when your FICO is 496 and your bank accounts are zeroed
out.
> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>
> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>
> Short of funds...
>
> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>
> Probably the one who gives me free...
Free" Hmmm, Well *HUSH*...Let me think so be quiet if I don't answer I
will e*MAIL* it to you.
--
"The Toast of Buffalo! = http://tinyurl.com/2v9sjf9 Ari himself, with
his unerring sense of what is hip, contributed a box of doughnuts
from Famous Doughnuts, a company he owns."
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:26:13 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>
>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>
> Dastardly...
>
>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>
>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>
>> Short of funds...
>>
>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>
>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>
> Free" Hmmm, Well *HUSH*...Let me think so be quiet if I don't answer I
> will e*MAIL* it to you.
Goblin, don't you ever HUSHor eMAIL me.
THANKS
--
Tech, computer repair specialist (on the side), part time Tech
Pro poster to Wilders Security...home base...On usenet to help noobs
Not me...
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:10:42 -0500, chronomatic wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>
>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>
>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>
>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>
>>> Short of funds...
>>>
>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>
>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>
>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>
>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>
>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>
>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>> much stomach? ;)
>
>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>
> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>
> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
> you want to know if its from me?
>
> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
I don't have clock for you tonight, chronomatic, my Steve has posted
to Wilders!!
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:26:13 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>
>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>
>> Dastardly...
>>
>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>
>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>
>>> Short of funds...
>>>
>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>
>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>
>> Free" Hmmm, Well *HUSH*...Let me think so be quiet if I don't answer I
>> will e*MAIL* it to you.
>
> Goblin, don't you ever HUSHor eMAIL me.
>
> THANKS
No problem. /lol/ TECH missed that jet flying over TECH's head?
--
ŽIf you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:06:32 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:39:26 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:26:13 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>
>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>
>>> Dastardly...
>>>
>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>>
>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>>
>>>> Short of funds...
>>>>
>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>>
>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>
>>> Free" Hmmm, Well *HUSH*...Let me think so be quiet if I don't answer I
>>> will e*MAIL* it to you.
>>
>> Goblin, don't you ever HUSHor eMAIL me.
>>
>> THANKS
>
> No problem. /lol/ TECH missed that jet flying over TECH's head?
NO...
OK, I get it...
You're talking about Hushmail's question/answer message encryption
option...
I knew this but wanted NOOBS to know...
I've checked it out...using Tech...
DONE...
NO THANKS...TO GOBLIN...
--
Tech, computer repair specialist (on the side), part time Tech
Pro poster to Wilders Security...home base...On usenet to help noobs
Not me...
On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>
>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Short of funds...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>
>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>
>>>>
>
>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>
>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>
>>>
>
>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>
>>>
>
>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>
>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>
>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>
>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>
>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>
>>> much stomach? ;)
>
>>
>
>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>
>>
>
>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>
>>
>
>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
>
>> you want to know if its from me?
>
>>
>
>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>
> Thanks, Ari.
I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users
-- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org".
There's more at my website.
I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name
it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of
them. ;0)
--
hierophant heresmypants@hushmail.comhttp://heresmypants.weebly.com/
"Usenet is a trolls' wasteland that I pay no attention to and only
post to it with my eyes closed. ~heirophant trolling alt.privacy
> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
> website.
>
> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
You're wasting your time. Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly.
Dozens of forged names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous
accounts over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
losing most of them. But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
respect to care.
Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular. Add
to that sci.crypt, where he got an equally deserved but "toned down"
thrashing, and you have the whole picture. Hell, the Wilders thing is
part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed planted in his tiny little brain
that I might participate in that forum too, so he tried pulling his
kiddie games there and got canned repeatedly. It's pretty tough not to
spot his immaturity, even from behind proxies and such, so his antics
left him feeling all unsatisfied and he decided to start re-posting
Wilders material in AP and APAS.
> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough maturity in
him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get from confronting
him in a more personal way is knowing he spent some time huddling in a
pudddle of his own piss again. Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction
in it, I've even made the poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks
I've embarrassed him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop
someone as obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/
civil charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
couple times now, and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the
code here. If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my
guest, but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
once in a while. ;)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> heirophant wrote:
>
>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>> website.
>>
>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>
> You're wasting your time.
Why does that matter to you?
> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
> losing most of them.
Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
> respect to care.
First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
world would you believe he cares about you.
What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
geolocation.
> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
> Add to that sci.crypt,
Included.
> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
> have the whole picture.
You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
*entire* pie - so to speak.
> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
> canned repeatedly.
Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
address.
> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
Finally got one correct )>
>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
several others.
> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
> couple times now,
I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
> once in a while. ;)
According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
cretinous.
I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
and childlike. ;)
--
hierophant heresmypants@hushmail.comhttp://heresmypants.weebly.com/
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:59 -0500, heirophant wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> heirophant wrote:
>>
>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>>> website.
>>>
>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>
>> You're wasting your time.
>
> Why does that matter to you?
>
>> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
>> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
>> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
>> losing most of them.
>
> Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
> out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
>
>> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
>> respect to care.
>
> First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
> Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
> murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
> world would you believe he cares about you.
>
> What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
> exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
> geolocation.
>
>> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
>> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
>> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
>> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
>> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
>
> Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
> several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
> Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
> toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
> espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
>
>> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
>> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
>> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
>> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
>
> Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
> newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
> alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
>
>> Add to that sci.crypt,
>
> Included.
>
>> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
>> have the whole picture.
>
> You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
> *entire* pie - so to speak.
>
>> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
>> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
>> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
>> canned repeatedly.
>
> Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
> there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
> address.
>
>> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
>> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
>> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
>
> Finally got one correct )>
>
>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
>
>> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
>> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
>> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
>> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
>
> You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
> Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
> income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
> else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
> wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
> several others.
>
>> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
>> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
>> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
>> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
>> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
>
> Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
> worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
>
>> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
>> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
>> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
>> couple times now,
>
> I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
>
>> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
>> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
>> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
>> once in a while. ;)
>
> According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
> in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
> cretinous.
>
> I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
> of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
> and childlike. ;)
Difference...heirophant and I use TECH...Anonymous uses NOTHING...
Anonymous has no skin in the game against Frank...WE do...
AT RISK = skin, we are real people with real names...
And a real vendetta with real consequences...
THANKS
--
These are dark times, there is no denying. Our Tech world has perhaps
faced no greater threat than it does today. But I say this to my
citizenry: I, ever your servant, will continue to defend your liberty
and repel the forces that seek to take it from you! I remain, strong. https://groups.google.com/group/alt....6f94c317a526bd https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.ph...9&postcount=25
Anybody with an internet connection, 5 grand, an iq above room
temperature and basic literacy can grow outstanding cannabis.
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:59 -0500, heirophant wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>
>>> heirophant wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>>>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>>>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>>>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>>>> website.
>>>>
>>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>
>>> You're wasting your time.
>>
>> Why does that matter to you?
>>
>>> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
>>> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
>>> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
>>> losing most of them.
>>
>> Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
>> out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
>>
>>> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
>>> respect to care.
>>
>> First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
>> Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
>> murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
>> world would you believe he cares about you.
>>
>> What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
>> exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
>> geolocation.
>>
>>> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
>>> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
>>> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
>>> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
>>> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
>>
>> Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
>> several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
>> Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
>> toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
>> espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
>>
>>> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
>>> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
>>> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
>>> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
>>
>> Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
>> newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
>> alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
>>
>>> Add to that sci.crypt,
>>
>> Included.
>>
>>> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
>>> have the whole picture.
>>
>> You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
>> *entire* pie - so to speak.
>>
>>> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
>>> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
>>> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
>>> canned repeatedly.
>>
>> Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
>> there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
>> address.
>>
>>> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
>>> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
>>> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
>>
>> Finally got one correct )>
>>
>>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>>>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
>>
>>> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
>>> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
>>> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
>>> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
>>
>> You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
>> Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
>> income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
>> else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
>> wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
>> several others.
>>
>>> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
>>> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
>>> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
>>> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
>>> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
>>
>> Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
>> worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
>>
>>> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
>>> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
>>> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
>>> couple times now,
>>
>> I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
>>
>>> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
>>> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
>>> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
>>> once in a while. ;)
>>
>> According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
>> in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
>> cretinous.
>>
>> I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
>> of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
>> and childlike. ;)
>
> Difference...heirophant and I use TECH...Anonymous uses NOTHING...
>
> Anonymous has no skin in the game against Frank...WE do...
>
> AT RISK = skin, we are real people with real names...
>
> And a real vendetta with real consequences...
>
> THANKS
Phrased well, DasFox, on your game for a change? ;) One thing we need
to keep in mind is our focus. "Anonymous" could be anyone including
Frank himself. Camper's PSYOPS capabilities are well established; a
perfect misdirection borne as an Anonymous post?
I found it peculiar that this particular Anonymous would happen along
at this time as we close in on Camper. A long, long answer to my post
it was. An enormous effort to claim that all damage has been attempted
and extracted. An enormous amount of effort writing scripts for much
ado of nothing. An enormous amount of effort to puff out his chest
screaming "Victory" and how asheamed Frank should feel. Hm.
On the surface, Anonymous would have us believe he has dealt a death
blow to "Ari". Yet as we have documented, Camper-Silverstein is more
active after the poster's efforts than before.
Let's not be distracted and as Deep Throat reported "Follow the money"
or in Frank's case, cut the money stream off. ;0)
-- http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> Sliverdick doesn't have enough maturity in him to be rehabbed. The
> only satisfaction you might get from confronting him in a more
> personal way is knowing he spent some time huddling in a pudddle of
> his own piss again. Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in
> it, I've even made the poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few
> weeks I've embarrassed him so much...
Got to cruise, pilot and travel from home to home to home to home
sometime, Mr. Anonymousie!
--
Ari Silverstein, C.T.A; C.T.A.S, FREE Cruise Travel Advisory Services
I never have nor ever will solicit or accept a booking. http://www.cruisecompare.co.uk/ USA site due 1Q 2011.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> You're wasting your time. Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly.
> Dozens of forged names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous
> accounts over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
> losing most of them. But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
> respect to care.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough maturity in
> him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get from confronting
> him in a more personal way is knowing he spent some time huddling in a
> pudddle of his own piss again. Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction
> in it, I've even made the poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks
> I've embarrassed him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop
> someone as obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/
> civil charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
I'd love to see that, Mr. Anonymousie so hurry, hurry, and get right
on that. Time's a wastin'!
--
ŽIf you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu
On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>
>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>
>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Short of funds...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>>
>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>>
>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>>
>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>>
>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>>
>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>>
>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>>
>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
>>
>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>
>> Thanks, Ari.
>
> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users
> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org".
> There's more at my website.
>
> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>
> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name
> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of
> them. ;0)
Absolutely true. And worse.
Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity. He'll change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still retaining much of the original structure. He'll then repost the same content that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered name, and post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server making it appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting to Usenet. Which he isn't.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:31:38 -0500, heirophant wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:21:01 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:59 -0500, heirophant wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>>
>>>> heirophant wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>>>>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>>>>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>>>>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>>>>> website.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>>
>>>> You're wasting your time.
>>>
>>> Why does that matter to you?
>>>
>>>> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
>>>> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
>>>> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
>>>> losing most of them.
>>>
>>> Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
>>> out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
>>>
>>>> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
>>>> respect to care.
>>>
>>> First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
>>> Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
>>> murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
>>> world would you believe he cares about you.
>>>
>>> What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
>>> exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
>>> geolocation.
>>>
>>>> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
>>>> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
>>>> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
>>>> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
>>>> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
>>>
>>> Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
>>> several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
>>> Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
>>> toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
>>> espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
>>>
>>>> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
>>>> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
>>>> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
>>>> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
>>>
>>> Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
>>> newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
>>> alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
>>>
>>>> Add to that sci.crypt,
>>>
>>> Included.
>>>
>>>> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
>>>> have the whole picture.
>>>
>>> You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
>>> *entire* pie - so to speak.
>>>
>>>> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
>>>> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
>>>> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
>>>> canned repeatedly.
>>>
>>> Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
>>> there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
>>> address.
>>>
>>>> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
>>>> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
>>>> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
>>>
>>> Finally got one correct )>
>>>
>>>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>>>>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
>>>
>>>> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
>>>> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
>>>> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
>>>> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
>>>
>>> You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
>>> Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
>>> income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
>>> else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
>>> wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
>>> several others.
>>>
>>>> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
>>>> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
>>>> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
>>>> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
>>>> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
>>>
>>> Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
>>> worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
>>>
>>>> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
>>>> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
>>>> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
>>>> couple times now,
>>>
>>> I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
>>>
>>>> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
>>>> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
>>>> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
>>>> once in a while. ;)
>>>
>>> According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
>>> in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
>>> cretinous.
>>>
>>> I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
>>> of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
>>> and childlike. ;)
>>
>> Difference...heirophant and I use TECH...Anonymous uses NOTHING...
>>
>> Anonymous has no skin in the game against Frank...WE do...
>>
>> AT RISK = skin, we are real people with real names...
>>
>> And a real vendetta with real consequences...
>>
>> THANKS
>
> Phrased well, DasFox, on your game for a change? ;) One thing we need
> to keep in mind is our focus. "Anonymous" could be anyone including
> Frank himself. Camper's PSYOPS capabilities are well established; a
> perfect misdirection borne as an Anonymous post?
>
> I found it peculiar that this particular Anonymous would happen along
> at this time as we close in on Camper. A long, long answer to my post
> it was. An enormous effort to claim that all damage has been attempted
> and extracted. An enormous amount of effort writing scripts for much
> ado of nothing. An enormous amount of effort to puff out his chest
> screaming "Victory" and how asheamed Frank should feel. Hm.
>
> On the surface, Anonymous would have us believe he has dealt a death
> blow to "Ari". Yet as we have documented, Camper-Silverstein is more
> active after the poster's efforts than before.
>
> Let's not be distracted and as Deep Throat reported "Follow the money"
> or in Frank's case, cut the money stream off. ;0)
Aren't you two the snmarties, eh?
Here's something you can chew on. I have had three people walk up to
one of my residences (you have found two of them, two to go OCONUS).
After we met, go ask them if they felt like they had won...or lost the
game.
That is if you can find them at all.
--
ŽIf you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>>
>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>>>
>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>>>
>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>>>
>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>>>
>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>>>
>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>>>
>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>>>
>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
>>>
>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>
>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users
>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org".
>> There's more at my website.
>>
>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>
>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name
>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of
>> them. ;0)
>
> Absolutely true. And worse.
>
> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity. He'll
> change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still retaining
> much of the original structure. He'll then repost the same content
> that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered name, and
> post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server making it
> appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting to
> Usenet. Which he isn't.
>
> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>>
>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>>>
>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>>>
>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>>>
>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>>>
>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>>>
>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>>>
>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>>>
>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
>>>
>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>
>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users
>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org".
>> There's more at my website.
>>
>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>
>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name
>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of
>> them. ;0)
>
> Absolutely true. And worse.
>
> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity. He'll change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still retaining much of the original structure. He'll then repost the same content that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered name, and post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server making it appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting to Usenet. Which he isn't.
>
> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
I'm amazing. I can't believe how ****ing incorrigible I am. To think
you and pissninherpants have corroborating, conclusive evidence, I
.....wait, you don't; you don't have **** other than your hands in each
other herpants. *LOL*
Thanks for playing, go to go, see you back in a while, suck my dick.
*ROFL*
--
ŽIf you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu
On 1/20/2011 1:48 PM, heirophant wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email communication is
>>>>
>>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next problem...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come up to the
>>>>
>>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes don't offer
>>>>
>>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January 5, someone
>>>>
>>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further consideration, I
>>>>
>>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is not the
>>>>
>>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct that
>>>>
>>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit, see too
>>>>
>>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an email,
>>>>
>>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>>
>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
>>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
>>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users
>>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org".
>>> There's more at my website.
>>>
>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>
>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name
>>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of
>>> them. ;0)
>>
>> Absolutely true. And worse.
>>
>> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity. He'll
>> change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still retaining
>> much of the original structure. He'll then repost the same content
>> that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered name, and
>> post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server making it
>> appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting to
>> Usenet. Which he isn't.
>>
>> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
>
> A psychosis or PSYOPsis is yet to be determined indeed. ;)
On 1/20/2011 1:07 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:31:38 -0500, heirophant wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:21:01 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:59 -0500, heirophant wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> heirophant wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>>>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>>>>>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>>>>>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>>>>>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> You're wasting your time.
>>>>
>>>> Why does that matter to you?
>>>>
>>>>> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
>>>>> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
>>>>> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
>>>>> losing most of them.
>>>>
>>>> Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
>>>> out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
>>>>
>>>>> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
>>>>> respect to care.
>>>>
>>>> First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
>>>> Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
>>>> murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
>>>> world would you believe he cares about you.
>>>>
>>>> What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
>>>> exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
>>>> geolocation.
>>>>
>>>>> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
>>>>> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
>>>>> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
>>>>> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
>>>>> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
>>>>
>>>> Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
>>>> several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
>>>> Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
>>>> toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
>>>> espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
>>>>
>>>>> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
>>>>> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
>>>>> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
>>>>> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
>>>>
>>>> Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
>>>> newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
>>>> alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
>>>>
>>>>> Add to that sci.crypt,
>>>>
>>>> Included.
>>>>
>>>>> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
>>>>> have the whole picture.
>>>>
>>>> You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
>>>> *entire* pie - so to speak.
>>>>
>>>>> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
>>>>> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
>>>>> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
>>>>> canned repeatedly.
>>>>
>>>> Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
>>>> there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
>>>> address.
>>>>
>>>>> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
>>>>> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
>>>>> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
>>>>
>>>> Finally got one correct )>
>>>>
>>>>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>>>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>>>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>>>>>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
>>>>
>>>>> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
>>>>> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
>>>>> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
>>>>> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
>>>>
>>>> You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
>>>> Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
>>>> income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
>>>> else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
>>>> wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
>>>> several others.
>>>>
>>>>> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
>>>>> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
>>>>> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
>>>>> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
>>>>> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
>>>>
>>>> Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
>>>> worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
>>>>
>>>>> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
>>>>> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
>>>>> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
>>>>> couple times now,
>>>>
>>>> I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
>>>>
>>>>> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
>>>>> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
>>>>> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
>>>>> once in a while. ;)
>>>>
>>>> According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
>>>> in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
>>>> cretinous.
>>>>
>>>> I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
>>>> of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
>>>> and childlike. ;)
>>>
>>> Difference...heirophant and I use TECH...Anonymous uses NOTHING...
>>>
>>> Anonymous has no skin in the game against Frank...WE do...
>>>
>>> AT RISK = skin, we are real people with real names...
>>>
>>> And a real vendetta with real consequences...
>>>
>>> THANKS
>>
>> Phrased well, DasFox, on your game for a change? ;) One thing we need
>> to keep in mind is our focus. "Anonymous" could be anyone including
>> Frank himself. Camper's PSYOPS capabilities are well established; a
>> perfect misdirection borne as an Anonymous post?
>>
>> I found it peculiar that this particular Anonymous would happen along
>> at this time as we close in on Camper. A long, long answer to my post
>> it was. An enormous effort to claim that all damage has been attempted
>> and extracted. An enormous amount of effort writing scripts for much
>> ado of nothing. An enormous amount of effort to puff out his chest
>> screaming "Victory" and how asheamed Frank should feel. Hm.
>>
>> On the surface, Anonymous would have us believe he has dealt a death
>> blow to "Ari". Yet as we have documented, Camper-Silverstein is more
>> active after the poster's efforts than before.
>>
>> Let's not be distracted and as Deep Throat reported "Follow the money"
>> or in Frank's case, cut the money stream off. ;0)
>
> Aren't you two the snmarties, eh?
>
> Here's something you can chew on. I have had three people walk up to
> one of my residences (you have found two of them, two to go OCONUS).
>
> After we met, go ask them if they felt like they had won...or lost the
> game.
>
> That is if you can find them at all.
"snmarties?" Having a hard time spelling today, Frank?
In any case, times changes. The players are sharper.
The game is different.
The end result will most assuredly not be the same.
On 1/20/2011 1:51 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email
communication is
>>>>
>>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free,
next problem...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to
come up to the
>>>>
>>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user
here...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the
likes don't offer
>>>>
>>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on
January 5, someone
>>>>
>>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further
consideration, I
>>>>
>>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is
not the
>>>>
>>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may
correct that
>>>>
>>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get
fit, see too
>>>>
>>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get
an email,
>>>>
>>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>>
>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of
the
>>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of
the
>>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins
and users
>>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-
privat.org".
>>> There's more at my website.
>>>
>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>
>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and
more on his
>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality
profiling, using
>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox
would name
>>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities
of all of
>>> them. ;0)
>>
>> Absolutely true. And worse.
>>
>> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders
username/identity. He'll change or alter the spelling of the
name slightly, still retaining much of the original structure.
He'll then repost the same content that originally appeared on
Wilders, using the altered name, and post it on alt. privacy, or
alt.privacy.anon-server making it appear as though the Wilders
identity is actually posting to Usenet. Which he isn't.
>>
>> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
>
> I'm amazing. I can't believe how ****ing incorrigible I am. To think
> you and pissninherpants have corroborating, conclusive evidence, I
> ....wait, you don't; you don't have **** other than your hands in each
> other herpants. *LOL*
>
> Thanks for playing, go to go, see you back in a while, suck my dick.
>
> *ROFL*
On 1/20/2011 1:51 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email
communication is
>>>>
>>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next
problem...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come
up to the
>>>>
>>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes
don't offer
>>>>
>>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January
5, someone
>>>>
>>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further
consideration, I
>>>>
>>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is
not the
>>>>
>>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct
that
>>>>
>>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit,
see too
>>>>
>>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245 nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an
email,
>>>>
>>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>>
>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
>>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
>>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and
users
>>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-
privat.org".
>>> There's more at my website.
>>>
>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>
>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more
on his
>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling,
using
>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox
would name
>>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of
all of
>>> them. ;0)
>>
>> Absolutely true. And worse.
>>
>> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity.
He'll change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still
retaining much of the original structure. He'll then repost the
same content that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered
name, and post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server
making it appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting
to Usenet. Which he isn't.
>>
>> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
>
> I'm amazing. I can't believe how ****ing incorrigible I am. To think
> you and pissninherpants have corroborating, conclusive evidence, I
> ....wait, you don't; you don't have **** other than your hands in each
> other herpants. *LOL*
>
> Thanks for playing, go to go, see you back in a while, suck my dick.
>
> *ROFL*
Life can be that simple; relief - discomfort.
Now, which of these I next apply, that decision is in your hands,
so...take your time and tell me.
On 21 Jan 2011 12:35:12 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
> On 1/20/2011 1:51 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:57 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/20/2011 6:24 AM, heirophant wrote:
>>>> On 17 Jan 2011 11:20:00 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/16/2011 11:10 PM, chronomatic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:06:44 -0500, nix wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:01:47 -0500, DasFox wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This has to STOP...so turn to Tech...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, the best I think we can hope for, for all email
> communication is
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> getting users on encrypted Web services...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now if I can figure out who I'd like to use for free, next
> problem...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Short of funds...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And of course who I am going to recommend to others...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably the one who gives me free...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This encryption web based provider is going to have to come
> up to the
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> level of the next Yahoo or Gmail...or NO TECH user here...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In fact, I wonder why Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and the likes
> don't offer
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> an encrypted option, hmm...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> By the way to chronomatic,,,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...after I asked you to open a Hushmail account on January
> 5, someone
>>>>>
>>>>>>> did, in fact, email me under your nym. After further
> consideration, I
>>>>>
>>>>>>> am going to assume that the chronomatic who emailed me is
> not the
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wilders chronomatic or the chronomatic here. You may correct
> that
>>>>>
>>>>>>> perception or not, as you see fit. If fit. If not, get fit,
> see too
>>>>>
>>>>>>> much stomach? ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Call/email Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245
> nnorelli@platanalytics.com
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Personal attack not appreciated, Norelli.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You asked me to open an Hushmail account then when you get an
> email,
>>>>>
>>>>>> you want to know if its from me?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you drunk, drugged or both?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Ari.
>>>>
>>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the
>>>> troll's early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the
>>>> strange posts -- including many caricaturing Wilders admins and
> users
>>>> -- have come from host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-
> privat.org".
>>>> There's more at my website.
>>>>
>>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>>>
>>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more
> on his
>>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling,
> using
>>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox
> would name
>>>> it ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of
> all of
>>>> them. ;0)
>>>
>>> Absolutely true. And worse.
>>>
>>> Silverstein will assume an existing Wilders username/identity.
> He'll change or alter the spelling of the name slightly, still
> retaining much of the original structure. He'll then repost the
> same content that originally appeared on Wilders, using the altered
> name, and post it on alt. privacy, or alt.privacy.anon-server
> making it appear as though the Wilders identity is actually posting
> to Usenet. Which he isn't.
>>>
>>> All part and parcel of the Silverstein psychosis.
>>
>> I'm amazing. I can't believe how ****ing incorrigible I am. To think
>> you and pissninherpants have corroborating, conclusive evidence, I
>> ....wait, you don't; you don't have **** other than your hands in each
>> other herpants. *LOL*
>>
>> Thanks for playing, go to go, see you back in a while, suck my dick.
>>
>> *ROFL*
>
> Life can be that simple; relief - discomfort.
> Now, which of these I next apply, that decision is in your hands,
> so...take your time and tell me.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:59 -0500, heirophant wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:34:33 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> heirophant wrote:
>>
>>> I've been looking into that. It's not at all clear that "Ari
>>> Silverstein" is the troll. Indeed, he may have been one of the troll's
>>> early victims. What does seem clear is that many of the strange posts --
>>> including many caricaturing Wilders admins and users -- have come from
>>> host $$jew5lonfukkmypj7l67noze.news.x-privat.org". There's more at my
>>> website.
>>>
>>> http://heresmypants.weebly.com/
>>
>> You're wasting your time.
>
> Why does that matter to you?
>
>> Sliverdick has already been outed repeatedly. Dozens of forged
>> names, kiddie game cross posting... he's lost numerous accounts
>> over that crap in fact. I know because I'm responsible for him
>> losing most of them.
>
> Which is why he can only troll-post through x-privat, as I pointed
> out. Thanks for making things easier for me ;)
>
>> But the poor dumb ******* doesn't have enough self
>> respect to care.
>
> First, apparently you are unaware that "Ari" is actually Frank Camper.
> Let's use his real name when parsing his caring. Frank is a mass
> murderer, former - or present- CIA, DEA and FBI operative. Why in the
> world would you believe he cares about you.
>
> What Frank does care about is his offline, real identity being
> exposed. This is my quest and I am almost there including complete
> geolocation.
>
>> Sliverdick was also created by me, and for that I apologize. The idiot
>> showed up in the privacy groups with some sort of asinine "bar code
>> encryption" scheme, and I trounced him royally on it after he acted like
>> a 2 year old when his thoughtless scheme was duly critiqued. And to this
>> day the infatuated fartstain just can't get over it.
>
> Again, you may have done this or that but the facts are that Frank has
> several patents on data storage devices. If you look in the GSA
> Quarterly, you will further see he has and does supply a rather long
> toothed line of products through various companies. Which, I again
> espouse, it endangers him dreadfully to be exposed.
>
>> Need proof? Do a little more general research... you'll see Sliverdick
>> funneling and forging posts from other groups into alt.privacy and
>> alt.privacy.anon-server. His whole shtick revolves around his years-long
>> childish vendetta against myself and those two groups in particular.
>
> Really, you over value yourself to he extreme. I have Frank in over 20
> newsgroups of which he is more active in most than in the
> alt.privacy.* groups. ;0)
>
>> Add to that sci.crypt,
>
> Included.
>
>> where he got an equally deserved but "toned down" thrashing, and you
>> have the whole picture.
>
> You have *A* picture, I am sorting, collecting and piece-mealing the
> *entire* pie - so to speak.
>
>> Hell, the Wilders thing is part of it too. Sliverdick got the seed
>> planted in his tiny little brain that I might participate in that
>> forum too, so he tried pulling his kiddie games there and got
>> canned repeatedly.
>
> Frank has been in and out of Wilders for years. He is still active
> there and Wilders has developed at least ten identities of his via IP
> address.
>
>> It's pretty tough not to spot his immaturity, even from behind
>> proxies and such, so his antics left him feeling all unsatisfied
>> and he decided to start re-posting Wilders material in AP and APAS.
>
> Finally got one correct )>
>
>>> I have much more work to do on this discovery of "Ari" and more on his
>>> team which I am evermore convinced. From personality profiling, using
>>> hash systems and various other detections - Tech as DasFox would name it
>>> ;) - I am slowly but surely drawing in on the identities of all of them.
>
>> Like I said, a waste of time. Sliverdick doesn't have enough
>> maturity in him to be rehabbed. The only satisfaction you might get
>> from confronting him in a more personal way is knowing he spent
>> some time huddling in a pudddle of his own piss again.
>
> You need to step back and take a long, hard look at the history of
> Frank. He's hardly a piss-puddler, his only vulnerability is his
> income stream. this I intend to cut off. The rest of your and anyone
> else's Usenet attacks on Frank are worthless. /This/ is where time is
> wasted and by the looks of things, Frank has wasted years of yours and
> several others.
>
>> Don't get me wrong, there IS satisfaction in it, I've even made the
>> poor ******* crawl under a rock for a few weeks I've embarrassed
>> him so much, but the only thing that will probably stop someone as
>> obsessed as Sliverdick is a real life beating or criminal/ civil
>> charges. And to be real honest, the loser isn't worth the effort.
>
> Since you have neither the resources nor the evidence, it would be
> worthless for you. I am another case entirely. ;0)
>
>> As far as his forging, nym hopping, and crossposting goes... I've already
>> written a short Python script that peruses headers and collates posting
>> hosts with From: headers and such. I've posted the results in APAS a
>> couple times now,
>
> I have seen it. Nice work better spent in pursuits such as mine.
>
>> and if you want I'll clean things up a bit and post the code here.
>> If you wanna go after Sliverdick in earnest with it be my guest,
>> but I've sort of settled into just *****slapping the cretin every
>> once in a while. ;)
>
> According to the MKULTRA FOIA documents I have obtained, Frank's IQ is
> in the .5% or less distribution. This level of intellect is not
> cretinous.
>
> I will take another look at your work to see if it contains anything
> of value to me and I do appreciate your sweat efforts albeit misguided
> and childlike. ;)
Forging Emails 
Linear Mode
