Lavasoft Adaware

Does anyone know if they are having a problem with their definition
update server?

gary

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:10:04 +0100, Tx2
<this.is.an.inv@lid.address.u.know.com> wrote:

>but please, if you wish to post to more than one group,
>cross-post correctly.

The correct way to crosspost/multipost is not an open and shut case. I
see many groups where people tell others to multipost and other groups
where they are told to crosspost. I guess it depends on the
individuals' preference. Personally, I tend to post in just one group
and wait a couple days for a reply. If none, it's off to a different
group.

--
Zilbandy

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:17:42 +0100, Tx2
<this.is.an.inv@lid.address.u.know.com> wrote:

>> The correct way to crosspost/multipost is not an open and shut case.
>
>I cite a 'popular' source for your perusal
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting
>
>and then see the section "Etiquette" at
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_posting
>
>There are others. A Google search will provide references.

Wikipedia, you say. Hmmm, I wonder what they say about which
automobile is the best one for people to drive. I looked at
generalmotors.com, ford.com, and toyota.com, and they all seem to
think they have the best answer. Like I said, it's not an open and
shut case, Wikipedia not withstanding.

--
Zilbandy

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:26:07 -0700, Zilbandy
<zil@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote:

> Like I said, it's not an open and
>shut case, Wikipedia not withstanding.

Maybe I should restate this. Some groups I frequent do not like
crossposts. I think one should try to conform with the norm for the
group. Now, I personally don't like to multipost or cross post, but I
do have a crosspost filter on my Usenet client and I do use it. Also,
when I reply to a crossposted message, my Usenet client is set to
respond only to the group I'm reading. All these options can make
crossposting just as frustrating as multiposting. My advice... do
neither.

--
Zilbandy