"Unruh" <unruh-spam@physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:ddo0er$7im$2@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca...
> "Hairy One Kenobi" <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> writes:
>
>
> >"optikl" <optikl@invalid.net> wrote in message
> >news:b_KdnemEX5WQ6mPfRVn-3A@comcast.com...
> >> Imhotep wrote:
> >> > I hope the other states (and countries) follow...
> >> >
> >> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08...es_disclosure/
> >>
> >> Yes, clearly that's one law whose time has come. It's a shame though
> >> that it takes a law to inspire an entity to fess up that confidential
> >> customer data has been stolen. You'd think that would be just the right
> >> thing to do.
>
> >OK, so you go to open a bank account.. do you choose the company that got
> >hacked last week, or someone else?
>
> Of course it may not be in their interest to do so. So law suits and laws
> change the equation of what their interests are.
>
> >Guess that explains the reluctance to come clean ;o)
>
> >Wonder how the law will ever get enforced..? Disgruntled employee is my
> >guess.
>
> These things tend to leak out. And then not only do they have bad PR but
> criminal legal action as well, which could find the CEO actually spending
> time in jail.
Cite? Feel free to exclude or include disgruntled employees... ;o)
H1K
PS. As goes leaks, a large Scottish bank that I have worked with employs
125k+ people, and managed to move their entire operations from London to
erm.. somewhere in Scotland over a weekend. Terabytes of data, and the first
time that I've seen a multi-gigabit national WAN in operation.
How many people noticed? Two. And one of those got his legs slapped for it
(he was an employee at the time); the other was a customer with traceroute
and far, far too much time on his hands :o)
Note that I am excluding hoteliers and taxi drivers.. they *must* have known
that something was up.