"Miguel A. Gallardo en http://www.cita.es" <miguelito.gallardo@gmail.com>
wrote in message
news:1154103837.246742.167370@p79g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
> Joseph Ashwood ha escrito:
>
>> "Miguel A. Gallardo en http://www.cita.es" <miguelito.gallardo@gmail.com>
>> wrote in message
>> news:1153765560.625531.243630@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
>> [snip pointless.]
>>
>> > I explaned cryptography invited byt the Army and the Diplomacy in China
>> > (1994), also in Argentina 1995, and in Honk Kong as you can read at
>> > http://www.cita.es/HK
>>
>> Umm, yeah, this once again shows how little you know, that page is
>> entirely
>> about gem stones, which has nothing to do with cryptography.
>
> I shall be pleased to explain as much as I can the basic idea of
> "object oriented cryptography" applied to very expensive objects like
> gemstones shortly explained at http://www.cita.es/branding
This I just have to hear. How does pure information relate to physical
objects?
I can see tagging objects, but cryptographic properties are irrelevant at
that level (the various fingerprinting methods for gem stones would be
superior). Cryptography does not solve any problem related to properties of
gemstone, for example a short amount of time on a grinding stone will have
little to no effect on cut, brilliance, refraction, and defraction
properties, but it will dramatically affect the fingerprint, and will
radically change any cryptographic properties associated with it.
>> > and shortly at http://www.cita.es/branding for
>> > "object oriented cryptography" home made in Spain.
>>
>> At this point you seem to be extremely confused about the difference
>> between
>> physical security measures and information security measures. They are
>> extremely different areas, and by claiming it is cryptographic very
>> quickly
>> proves that you do not even grasp the most basic concepts.
>
> I do not know how to prove that anybody does not know anything. I can
> confirm and evidence whatever is known by whoever, and to prove
> whatever whoever does not know is a diabolical proof of negative facts.
> I respect the bad opinion of anybody about me, my thoughts, my words,
> or my website pages, but I disagree with any supposed proof of anything
> that I do not know, because I have the hope to learn.
I have no problem with you learning, but you began this conversation by
claiming to be an expert. Even a couple of paragraphs ago, you once again
claimed to be an expert. If you want to learn there is a great deal of
knowledge in a few of the groups you posted to (we really should start
trimming it, I doubt microsoft.public.security or comp.security.misc has any
interest in debates about your claim of expertness), if you are already an
expert then you certainly don't prove it very well.
>> > I shall appreciate any comment or reference that let me to
>> > improve my knowledge on "USB pendrive applied Cryptology" (By the way,
>> > I think that Bruce Schneier must have new ideas about it).
>>
>> On that front I would gladly have supplied things, but the bottom line is
>> that you claimed to be a consultant, but you have demonstrated a complete
>> lack of knowledge or even the ability to grasp the core concepts.
>
> OK. I am a very bad consultant for you, and you think that I have
> demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge on everything.
>
> Now I know that you want to look like an expert just devaluating me.
Actually a large part of what I'm doing is working to protect the legal
system. Testimony from an expert that is far from expert tends to lead to
major issues. Since you made overtures towards being used as an expert
witness your lack of knowledge of the subject is of extreme importance.
Since you and I are in no way competitors, devaluing you would be for no
purpose.
> Can you give me 3 names of good cryptologists
Shannon, Feistel, Vigenere. None of which will likely be of use to you, as
I've specifically chosen them to be of little use to you, even though they
are exceedingly applicable.
> and 3 books useful for
> USB pen drives protection?
Safecracking for the Computer Scientist
Between Silk and Cyanide
Rethinking Public Key Infrastructures and Digital Certificates
Again, don't think these will help you much, understanding their application
to pen drives will be difficult.
More to the point. Can you?
Joe
Re: USB pen drives and safe cryptosystems (looking for references) 
Linear Mode
