On 14 Jan 2011 02:09:46 -0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:
> Why sub-standard? It's sub-standard because it doesn't meet the basic
> minimum requirement of peer review. I have to ask, do you believe
> peer review is important?
Great idea. In practice, it's near to useless.
--
´If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu