Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
Page 2 - Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!. Discuss Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!, on Wireless Forums.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:05:18 +0100, Sebastian G. wrote:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:14:55 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>
> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
> letters doesn't make any less false.
You mean other than the fact he admitted he spend 2 days cleaning up his
site to get rid of it, going through over 100,000 files?
No, other than that, ther's no indication.
>> That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>
> Wrong as well. The spreaders are the users who advise their system to
> automagically install malware downloaded from a website.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:35 -0400, Linonut wrote:
> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>>
>> Way to make yourself feel special, Roy.
>>
>> *EVERY* IP ADDRESS IN THE WORLD has many hacking attempts made against it,
>> every single day.
>>
>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>
> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
Oh, please. His site gets compromised in a standard botnet attack and he
twists to make it seem like he's being targeted explicitly, obviously
because he's such a threat.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
chrisv wrote:
> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote
> news:47dc06dd$0$28103$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Just KF the worthless POS and be done with it.
>>
>> *plonk*
> *plonk* , bro!
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
* Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:35 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>>>
>>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>>
>> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
>
> Oh, please. His site gets compromised in a standard botnet attack and he
> twists to make it seem like he's being targeted explicitly, obviously
> because he's such a threat.
>
> You don't see that as paranoia?
I don't see the /that/ that you see.
And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
Roy's sites.
And you know it.
--
There never was a chip, it is said, that Bill Gates couldn't slow down with a
new batch of features.
-- James Coates, The Chicago Tribune
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> writes:
> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>>
>> Way to make yourself feel special, Roy.
>>
>> *EVERY* IP ADDRESS IN THE WORLD has many hacking attempts made against it,
>> every single day.
>>
>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>
> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
Not that I expect a liar and fraud like you to understand, but which
part of what Erik said was WRONG Liarnut?
Bottom line : Schestowitz was infecting other peoples computers. And
since it was only Windows machines which got infected it wouldn't
surprise me one bit if there was more to this than meets the eye. He was
told ages ago about this and did NOTHING about it.
And now he starts waffling on about how is ip was attacked? Whoopee
Doo. It happens to everyone on broadband EVERY DAY!
The fact is that he is an incompetent big head with a persecution
complex. Him and Mark Kent have been made to look like the boobies they
are in the past few days.
You should be ashamed of yourself supporting such phonies and
idiots. They do more to harm the Linux cause than MS ever could!
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> writes:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:14:55 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>
>
> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in
> big letters doesn't make any less false.
Ok, who are you? Clearly a clueless fool and a nym shift from one of
Roy's fluffers. If his website was not compromised then please ask Roy
what he was doing with his 1000s of files the past 2 days.
>
>> That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>
>
> Wrong as well. The spreaders are the users who advise their system to
> automagically install malware downloaded from a website.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
In article <1rsjbuemti6ak$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
> > I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
> > 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still
> > have
> > this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
> > reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>
> What a wanker you are Roy.
>
> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
> it.
Well, at least it isn't infecting people now. The front page now is
this:
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
In article <642dveF2a7vd5U1@mid.dfncis.de>,
"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote:
> > You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
> > USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>
>
> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
> letters doesn't make any less false.
You don't consider someone other than yourself editing the pages on your
website to be being compromised?
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> writes:
> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:35 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>>>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>>>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>>>
>>> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
>>
>> Oh, please. His site gets compromised in a standard botnet attack and he
>> twists to make it seem like he's being targeted explicitly, obviously
>> because he's such a threat.
>>
>> You don't see that as paranoia?
>
> I don't see the /that/ that you see.
>
> And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
> COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
> Roy's sites.
>
> And you know it.
Like who? According to you all the COLA "windiots" are too stupid. I
know you are. I suspect it was another Linux "advocate" who got sick and
tired of Roy bringing COLA and Linux advocacy into the gutter. Hell, it
could even have been Mark Kent as part of his MS Partner Programme.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:39:09 -0400, Linonut wrote:
> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:35 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>>>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>>>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>>>
>>> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
>>
>> Oh, please. His site gets compromised in a standard botnet attack and he
>> twists to make it seem like he's being targeted explicitly, obviously
>> because he's such a threat.
>>
>> You don't see that as paranoia?
>
> I don't see the /that/ that you see.
>
> And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
> COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
> Roy's sites.
>
> And you know it.
And you think any of them are capable of it?
But that's irrelevant, since anyone with half a brain should know that
these were not deliberate attacks against him, instead I believe he chooses
to *PORTRAY* it as a deliberate attack, knowing that many in here will
believe him.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
In article <EzQCj.19709$r76.596@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> wrote:
> > Registrant:
> > N/A
> > Manager (manager@home-made.tv)
> > Wolfson 25
> > Rishon-Le-Zion
> > Ha Merkaz,75203
> > IL
> > Tel. +972.525920204
> >
> > Status:SUSPENDED
> > Note: This Domain Name is Suspended. In this status the domain name is
> > InActive and will not function.
>
> That entry is borked. The Zip is wrong.
What would be the right Zip? I am unable to find an online, free,
resource for Israeli zip codes that I can understand--they all seem to
be in Hebrew.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:
> In article <1rsjbuemti6ak$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
>> > I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>> > 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still
>> > have
>> > this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>> > reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>
> Well, at least it isn't infecting people now. The front page now is
> this:
>
> HaCkEd By LUViGARO ;D
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:45:45 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <1rsjbuemti6ak$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still
>>> have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>
> Well, at least it isn't infecting people now. The front page now is
> this:
>
> HaCkEd By LUViGARO ;D
| In article <642dveF2a7vd5U1@mid.dfncis.de>,
| "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote:
>>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>>
>> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
>> letters doesn't make any less false.
|
| You don't consider someone other than yourself editing the pages on your
| website to be being compromised?
|
The following was appended to the HTML of the web site...
{ obfuscated code }
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
Hadron wrote:
> Like who? According to you all the COLA "windiots" are too stupid. I
> know you are. I suspect it was another Linux "advocate" who got sick and
> tired of Roy bringing COLA and Linux advocacy into the gutter. Hell, it
> could even have been Mark Kent as part of his MS Partner Programme.
No, it was one of the Winidiots that continue to stink up this newsgroup.
Don't worry, though. We know it wasn't you, because there is no way you're
that smart.
--
Regards,
[tv]
....I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website,don't go there!!!!!!!!
Hadron wrote:
> Bottom line : Schestowitz was infecting other peoples computers.
No, he didn't. Repeating it over and over again doesn't help you.
> And since it was only Windows machines which got infected it wouldn't
> surprise me one bit if there was more to this than meets the eye.
You're twisting correlation and causality. Only machines using *Internet
Explorer* got infected, and since Internet Explorer is primarily only
available for Windows, the obvious consequence is that almost all of the
infected machines run Windows.
> He was told ages ago about this and did NOTHING about it.
Not just that it's not him at all, why exactly should be do anything about
it. He's not harming any serious visitor, and is getting access to machines
for free, and can't be hold responsible (since the users intentionally
offered him full access to their machines).
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> writes:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>
>> Bottom line : Schestowitz was infecting other peoples computers.
>
>
> No, he didn't. Repeating it over and over again doesn't help you.
>
>> And since it was only Windows machines which got infected it wouldn't
>> surprise me one bit if there was more to this than meets the eye.
>
>
> You're twisting correlation and causality. Only machines using
> *Internet Explorer* got infected, and since Internet Explorer is
On Windows.
> primarily only available for Windows, the obvious consequence is that
> almost all of the infected machines run Windows.
>
>> He was told ages ago about this and did NOTHING about it.
>
>
> Not just that it's not him at all, why exactly should be do anything
> about it. He's not harming any serious visitor, and is getting access
> to machines for free, and can't be hold responsible (since the users
> intentionally offered him full access to their machines).
LOL: Now I see you're only trying to make Roy look worse!
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website,don't go there!!!!!!!!
Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <642dveF2a7vd5U1@mid.dfncis.de>,
> "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote:
>>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>>
>> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
>> letters doesn't make any less false.
>
> You don't consider someone other than yourself editing the pages on your
> website to be being compromised?
Now that would be a serious indication if it's true. But this is unrelated
to the infection since a totally unmodified website including content from
potentially untrusted third party (as most big websites do) could appear
like it's infecting machines to the clueless.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website,don't go there!!!!!!!!
David H. Lipman wrote:
> There is a well established link between ESTDomains and malicious web sites that are
> designed to do nothing more then infect the unsuspecting visitor.
Technically that's a lie. If a user is abusing MSIE as a webbrowser, he
should be aware that he's effectively offering a remote shell to every
website he visits. If not, then he doesn't know what he's doing, and should
expect serious consequences from such ignorance as well.
An unsuspecting user would require using a secure webbrowser with a sane
configuration, which in turn can't be compromised that easily (if at all).
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website,don't go there!!!!!!!!
Hadron wrote:
>> You're twisting correlation and causality. Only machines using
>> *Internet Explorer* got infected, and since Internet Explorer is
>
> On Windows.
That's not the reason why IE is so trivial to compromise. Running IE on
Linux using Wine, or even running the native IE port on MacOSX results in
the very same vulnerability.
>>> He was told ages ago about this and did NOTHING about it.
>>
>> Not just that it's not him at all, why exactly should be do anything
>> about it. He's not harming any serious visitor, and is getting access
>> to machines for free, and can't be hold responsible (since the users
>> intentionally offered him full access to their machines).
>
> LOL: Now I see you're only trying to make Roy look worse!
No, rather not. See: I have been running a website discussing IE
exploitation. It was encoded in XHTML 1.0 Strict and the server was
correctly serving it a application/xhtml+xml. Now the funny/stupid thing is
that IE doesn't know this MIME type by default (and Microsoft doesn't intend
to simply add it via an update), so IE users get a download dialog instead
of the website.
Someone has been asking me how people should learn about the dangers of IE
when they can't access the website with IE... my response was that they
should simply use a real webbrowser instead of abusing IE as such, and I
don't intend breaking a 100% conformant website just because they don't know
how to differ a webbrowser from an ActiveX Rich Platform Client.
Some other users have been reporting to me that my website contains some
malware. I told them that this is obviously not the case (the exploits are
intentional for education purpose), and if their virus scanners are scanning
their websites they're surfing too, then they have at least a serious
configuration problem and a waste of resources for absolutely no increase of
security (think about script obfuscation or HTTPS).
If someone decides to gain access to every user's system who connects to his
site by simply stepping through the front door by using well documented
functionality, then he may do so. After all, if the users's software
technically doesn't express their intentions, it's their problem.
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:05:18 +0100, Sebastian G. wrote:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:14:55 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>
>
> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
> letters doesn't make any less false.
COLA denial at it's finest.
Truly amazing.....
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:58:04 -0400, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:39:09 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>
>> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:35 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>>>>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>>>>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>>>>
>>>> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
>>>
>>> Oh, please. His site gets compromised in a standard botnet attack and he
>>> twists to make it seem like he's being targeted explicitly, obviously
>>> because he's such a threat.
>>>
>>> You don't see that as paranoia?
>>
>> I don't see the /that/ that you see.
>>
>> And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
>> COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
>> Roy's sites.
>>
>> And you know it.
>
> And you think any of them are capable of it?
>
> But that's irrelevant, since anyone with half a brain should know that
> these were not deliberate attacks against him, instead I believe he chooses
> to *PORTRAY* it as a deliberate attack, knowing that many in here will
> believe him.
Of course they are going to believe him.
They are in denial.
Look at that guy Sebastion who is claiming it didn't even happen, even
after Roy Schestowitz admitted it.
Truly amazing.
Some of these Linux advocates are just like zombies.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:41:30 +0100, Hadron wrote:
> Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>>
>>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Way to make yourself feel special, Roy.
>>>
>>> *EVERY* IP ADDRESS IN THE WORLD has many hacking attempts made against it,
>>> every single day.
>>>
>>> No, there are clearly a lot of botnets out there attempting to attack
>>> virtually every IP address in the world. You're not special Roy, it
>>> happens to everyone. Get over it.
>>
>> Hard to, with you jamming his ass above.
>
> Not that I expect a liar and fraud like you to understand, but which
> part of what Erik said was WRONG Liarnut?
>
> Bottom line : Schestowitz was infecting other peoples computers. And
> since it was only Windows machines which got infected it wouldn't
> surprise me one bit if there was more to this than meets the eye. He was
> told ages ago about this and did NOTHING about it.
The classic signs of a narcissist.
Me?
It can't possibly be *me* because *I* am too smart for this.
Yes, Schestowitz knew about this and I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't
behind it to infect other people's machines.
With Roy Schestowitz, nothing would surprise me.
> And now he starts waffling on about how is ip was attacked? Whoopee
> Doo. It happens to everyone on broadband EVERY DAY!
The blinking "Internet LED" probably has him totally baffled.
> The fact is that he is an incompetent big head with a persecution
> complex. Him and Mark Kent have been made to look like the boobies they
> are in the past few days.
They are falling faster than the walls of Jericho.
That is what happens when your real motives are different than your true
motives.
> You should be ashamed of yourself supporting such phonies and
> idiots. They do more to harm the Linux cause than MS ever could!
They sure do.
For anyone new to Linux who starts googling Scehstowitz, and how can you
miss him because his name and websites are splattered everywhere, they will
get the impression that Linux is run by lunatics.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:45:45 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <1rsjbuemti6ak$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still
>>> have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>> it.
>
> Well, at least it isn't infecting people now. The front page now is
> this:
>
> HaCkEd By LUViGARO ;D
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:08:20 -0400, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:45:45 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <1rsjbuemti6ak$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>,
>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
>>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still
>>>> have
>>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>>
>>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>>
>>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS. Yes, it was something to do with your site. Your
>>> files were infected. That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>>> it.
>>
>> Well, at least it isn't infecting people now. The front page now is
>> this:
>>
>> HaCkEd By LUViGARO ;D
>
> Lol.
>
> Pw3d!
I wonder if Mark Kent's computer is infected as well?
And what about all those connections Make Kent supports for other people
who also use his computer to access USENET?
Has it spread to them as well?
I can't wait to see how Schestowitz and Kent try to explain this one away.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
"Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> schreef in
bericht news:qJCdnWzgkZ-XD0HaRVnyvAA@bt.com...
> chrisv wrote:
>> chrisv wrote:
>>> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote
>>> news:47dc06dd$0$28103$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just KF the worthless POS and be done with it.
>>>>
>>>> *plonk*
>>> *plonk* , bro!
>>
>> Don't *plonk* me, bro!
>
> Are you on the right pills?
>
*PLONK*, sister!
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!!
* Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>> And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
>> COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
>> Roy's sites.
>>
>> And you know it.
>
> And you think any of them are capable of it?
It doesn't matter. They are only a handshake away from someone who is
capable.
> But that's irrelevant, since anyone with half a brain should know that
> these were not deliberate attacks against him, instead I believe he chooses
> to *PORTRAY* it as a deliberate attack, knowing that many in here will
> believe him.
I don't believe Roy on this one. But I do believe it was a deliberate
attack, on my own evidence. Just because it is a common attack doesn't
make it non-deliberate.
It is quite possible to me that someone said, hey, see what you can do
with this shestowitz.com site, hmm?
--
We will never make a 32-bit operating system.
-- Bill Gates, At the launch of MSX[3]
Re: WARNING: Roy Schestowitz is spreading virusses on his website, don't go there!!!!!!!! 
Linear Mode
