Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)

nemo_outis wrote:
> Yet more blithering from you.

Tell us what 'blithering' means.
I think you want to use the word 'blathering'.

Now let's see if you will admit to this mistake.

Regards,

Larry Whittington wrote:

> "Blithering" is not a word.

I was wrong. Blithering is a word.

Regards,

Larry Whittington wrote:

I now know what blithering means.
I learned something new today.

Regards,

Larry Whittington wrote:

I learned something new today.

I now know what blithering means.

It means 'blathering', the word I was thinking of.

Regards,

> "Blithering" is not a word.
> You mean "blathering", you worthless idiot.

"Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.

Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> wrote in
news:R4GdnZDbX_MplC3anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com :

> nemo_outis wrote:
>> Yet more blithering from you.
>
> What does 'blithering' mean? I think you are referring to 'blathering'?
>
> Now let's see if you will admit to making this mistake.
>
> Regards,


"Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.

Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> wrote in
news:R4GdnZPbX_NSly3anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com :

> nemo_outis wrote:
>> Yet more blithering from you.
>
> Tell us what 'blithering' means.
> I think you want to use the word 'blathering'.
>
> Now let's see if you will admit to this mistake.
>
> Regards,
>

"Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.

nemo_outis wrote:
> Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> wrote in
> news:R4GdnZPbX_NSly3anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com :
>
>> nemo_outis wrote:
>>> Yet more blithering from you.
>> Tell us what 'blithering' means.
>> I think you want to use the word 'blathering'.
>>
>> Now let's see if you will admit to this mistake.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>
> "Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
> American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.
>

I know, you worthless dreg of society.

I admit to my mistakes. Let's see if you will admit to yours.

Regards,

nemo_outis wrote:

> "Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
> American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.

I know, you worthless dreg of society.

I admit to my mistakes. Let's see if you will admit to yours.

Regards,

nemo_outis wrote:

> "Blithering" is recognized in Merriam-Webster's, in Random House, in
> American-Heritage and assorted other dictionaries, you blithering idiot.

I know, you worthless dreg of society.

I admit to my mistakes. Let's see if you will admit to yours.

Regards,

Joseph Ashwood wrote:

> I haven't been paying much attention to this thread, just showing back up.
>
> "George Orwell" <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
> news:4955767a4780e41c11a89a77666c9796@mixmaster.it ...
> > nemo_outis wrote:
> >
> >> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
> >> news:ae9ee50c01782b4fbd6fc89b61779692@dizum.com:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Actually, there's all sorts of hardware based encryption for hard
> >> > drives. AES256 is becoming pretty popular in replacement notebook
> >> > drives I hear. As to "back doors", I'll happily leave that to the
> >> > conspiracy nuts. It's not relevant to this particular debate anyway.
> >>
> >> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
> >
> > Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
> > secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
> > obvious reasons.
>
>
> I actually have to agree with Nomen on this one. The hardware systems
> available are widely inferior. I won't name any names (mostly because I'm
> trying to forget about them) but there has been suppliers of "secure"
> hardware hard disk encryption alternatives that were enormously insecure.
> The errors have been everything from a fixed key across all devices, to
> using ECB, to "accidently" creating a broadcast antennae out of the key
> transport, often combining multiple problems in a single product. With
> knowledge of such mistakes having been made, I would say that hard disk
> encryption "suffers from problems" when performed in hardware.
> Joe
>

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Joseph Ashwood wrote:

> >> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
> >
> > Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
> > secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
> > obvious reasons.
>
>
> I actually have to agree with Nomen on this one. The hardware systems
> available are widely inferior. I won't name any names (mostly because I'm
> trying to forget about them) but there has been suppliers of "secure"

You're wrong, apparently because you're relying on anecdotal evidence.

But the sturdiness of hardware encryption and it's security relative to
software (the terms alone should give you a clue), is completely
irrelevant to the topic at hand. Nimrod made a fool of himself by
claiming one could not boot windows from an encrypted drive without an
unencrypted stub, copying an unencrypted stub to the drive, or a couple
other boneheadded guesses at how something like that might be done. His
narrow little mind let him down, and all the while he's acting like a
pompous asshole.

So now he's gotten himself spanked 4 or five times in as many days, and
been reduced to snipping and trying to flood his embarrassment away
with drivel. That's actually unusual for Nimrod. Not the spankings, the
sheer volume in such a short period of time. But then, Nimrod doesn't
generally hang in places like sci.crypt he tends to cower in less
populated areas like APAS, where he can convince himself he's some sort
of "witty expert" or whatever it is Nimrod fancies himself.

George Orwell wrote:

> nemo_outis wrote:
>
>> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
>> news:ae9ee50c01782b4fbd6fc89b61779692@dizum.com:
>>
>>
>>> Actually, there's all sorts of hardware based encryption for hard
>>> drives. AES256 is becoming pretty popular in replacement notebook
>>> drives I hear. As to "back doors", I'll happily leave that to the
>>> conspiracy nuts. It's not relevant to this particular debate anyway.
>> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
>
> Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
> secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
> obvious reasons.


This hardware stuff has been notoriously insecure because it always uses ECB
mode. Never seen anything else.

Back to blithering, I see.

Back to blithering, I see.

Back to blithering, I see.

Are you still blithering on?

You're wrong, fuckface.

Regards,

You're wrong, fuckface.

Regards,

You're wrong, fuckface.

Regards,

Oh, another blitherer.

Oh, another blitherer.

Oh, another blitherer.

Actually, I was responding to your post from my room-mate's computer.
I had forgotten where I was.

But anyway, you little pecker-headed fuckface, you need to take a reading
comprehension course yourself. If you do, you'll see that I was explaining
to you that I had discovered that 'blithering' was indeed a word. But it is
synonymous to 'blathering', the very word I mistook 'blithering' for.

Man, you got shit for brains, if you can't figure that out for yourself.

Regards,

Actually, I was responding to your post from my room-mate's computer.
I had forgotten where I was.

But anyway, you little pecker-headed fuckface, you need to take a reading
comprehension course yourself. If you do, you'll see that I was explaining
to you that I had discovered that 'blithering' was indeed a word. But it is
synonymous to 'blathering', the very word I mistook 'blithering' for.

Man, you got shit for brains, if you can't figure that out for yourself.

Regards,

Actually, I was responding to your post from my room-mate's computer.
I had forgotten where I was.

But anyway, you little pecker-headed fuckface, you need to take a reading
comprehension course yourself. If you do, you'll see that I was explaining
to you that I had discovered that 'blithering' was indeed a word. But it is
synonymous to 'blathering', the very word I mistook 'blithering' for.

Man, you got shit for brains, if you can't figure that out for yourself.

Regards,

You're still blithering.

You're still blithering.

You're still blithering.

You're still blathering.

Regards,