Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Page 11 - Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption). Discuss Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption), on Wireless Forums.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
nemo_outis wrote:
> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
> news:87lk5rbhy6.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org:
>
> > Can you guys just get a private room?
> >
> > Phil
>
> Can you just learn to use a filter or killfile?
And miss seeing a windbag like you get his comeuppance?
Perish the thought!
You've been bloodied up so badly you're left acting like the lowest
form of Usenet troll. Reduced to a pathetic little pointy headed
bridge dweller barely still able to manage a snarl any more.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Anonymous <xor@hermetix.org> writes:
> nemo_outis wrote:
>
> > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
> > news:87lk5rbhy6.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org:
> >
> > > Can you guys just get a private room?
> > >
> > > Phil
> >
> > Can you just learn to use a filter or killfile?
Yes. You've been it it for a while as you evidently have
nothing of worth to say.
> And miss seeing a windbag like you get his comeuppance?
The inane gibbering now taking between those two doesn't
count as "comeuppance".
Phil
--
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
-- Microsoft voice recognition live demonstration
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
"Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer" <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in
message news:357e35b36403fafc21aeb0c4313270bc@remailer.cyb eriade.it...
> Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>
>> >> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
>> >
>> > Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
>> > secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
>> > obvious reasons.
>>
>>
>> I actually have to agree with Nomen on this one. The hardware systems
>> available are widely inferior. I won't name any names (mostly because I'm
>> trying to forget about them) but there has been suppliers of "secure"
>
> You're wrong, apparently because you're relying on anecdotal evidence.
Actually I did the security analysis on a couple of these, and the ECB mode
use in one particular product that is heavily advertised (at least for such
a product) is widely recognised.
>
> But the sturdiness of hardware encryption and it's security relative to
> software (the terms alone should give you a clue), is completely
> irrelevant to the topic at hand.
That definitely changes the matter though. Since I've said my piece on the
matter, and the signal:noise ratio is certainly dreadful on this matter,
this will be my last post on the subject.
Joe
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
On 9 Feb 2008 23:22:37 +0100, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> Ari wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:41:28 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
>>
>>> No, Sebastian, by far the most plausible reason for every drive
>>> on a computer being filled with random junk is that encryption
>>> is being used.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>
>> Bullshit, Usenet posts.
>
> especially ones by kikes about bar code crypto and 40 acre nuclear
> test facilities.
Was it your Jewish, half-breed Mother's failure to abort that made you hate
yourself?
--
An Explanation Of The Need To Be "Anonymous" http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:39:51 -0500, Henrique Mandalin wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:15:31 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:
>>
>>> That's really funny coming from someone whose idea of "secure" is
>>> hiding something in a sock drawer.
>>
>> Depends on where the sock drawer resides. For you, yes, totally insecure.
>> Since you sleep on your hobo bag in the alley.
>
> It would be interesting to hear how you know that fact, if it is, in
> fact, a fact.
>
> Henrique
Be glad to.
As soon as you post under your real name like I fo.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:56:16 -0500 (EST), Anonymous wrote:
>> Ari wrote:
>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:15:31 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's really funny coming from someone whose idea of "secure"
>>>> is hiding something in a sock drawer.
>>>
>>> Depends on where the sock drawer resides. For you, yes, totally
>>> insecure. Since you sleep on your hobo bag in the alley.
>>
>> It would be interesting to hear how you know that fact, if it is,
>> in fact, a fact.
>
> Ari is acutely allergic to facts.
So speaketh Mr. Forthcoming, the non Anonymous factual person himself lol
You anon assholes, you think shouting from the mountaintops into the valley
is somehow like having real accountability for your actions and your
opinions. Without a real person attached to a post, you're nothing more
than a fucking echo, sounds nice, no credibility, no real source detected,
comes and goes, nothing changed.
--
An Explanation Of The Need To Be "Anonymous" http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Ari wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:39:51 -0500, Henrique Mandalin wrote:
>
>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:15:31 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's really funny coming from someone whose idea of "secure" is
>>>> hiding something in a sock drawer.
>>> Depends on where the sock drawer resides. For you, yes, totally insecure.
>>> Since you sleep on your hobo bag in the alley.
>> It would be interesting to hear how you know that fact, if it is, in
>> fact, a fact.
>>
>> Henrique
>
> Be glad to.
>
> As soon as you post under your real name like I fo.
>
> Arique
Actually, I've changed my mind.
I don't really give a fuck what you think.
You can go eat shit and die, for all I care.
Have you learned how to fuck yourself yet?
Here you go, munch on this.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption) 
Linear Mode
