Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Page 9 - Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption). Discuss Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption), on Wireless Forums.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
nemo_outis wrote:
> Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> wrote in news:1v-
> dnZsaGO2jWDLanZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> > nemo_outis wrote:
> >> Are you still blithering on?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >
> > Well, he, and the others, have all aptly shown you where you have erred.
> > And all you seem capable of doing is pretending they haven't.
> >
> > Regards,
>
>
> No, his points were completely answered long ago,
Just keep telling yourself that, if it lets you live with the
embarrassment.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Todd H. wrote:
> Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> writes:
>
>> An accurate indication of a person's overall worth to society would
>> be their ability to admit to being wrong when shown to be so by more
>> than one person, on several different occasions. I think it's fair
>> to say that over the past few days you have gravely missed many
>> opportunities to rectify your mistakes. And, in so doing, you have
>> disclosed a very apparent lack of any mental fortitude, or true
>> integrity of spirit and strength of character.
>>
>> To put it bluntly, you have revealed yourself as being rather
>> worthless.
>
> You've put a fine point on my collective observation (from reading in
> alt.computer.security) of Nemo as well.
>
>
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> writes:
> An accurate indication of a person's overall worth to society would
> be their ability to admit to being wrong when shown to be so by more
> than one person, on several different occasions. I think it's fair
> to say that over the past few days you have gravely missed many
> opportunities to rectify your mistakes. And, in so doing, you have
> disclosed a very apparent lack of any mental fortitude, or true
> integrity of spirit and strength of character.
>
> To put it bluntly, you have revealed yourself as being rather
> worthless.
You've put a fine point on my collective observation (from reading in
alt.computer.security) of Nemo as well.
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
nemo_outis wrote:
> Larry Whittington <larry245@infostreet.net> wrote in news:v9adnRgwb-
> q1RTLanZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> > nemo_outis wrote:
> >> Larry, it's a free country - believe whatever you wish, no matter how
> >> stupid it is.
> >
> > Well, that may be your modus operandi, but I prefer to make my decisions
> > based upon the evidence presented.
>
> Feel free to call whatever dreck you wish evidence, and then feel free to
> misinterpret it however suits you.
You should write Jetico and let them know their doc pages are dreck.
Don;t forget the folks at Truecrypt too.
Ya' idiot.
>
> Regards,
>
>
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
nemo_outis wrote:
> Are you still blithering on?
<laugh!>
I don't believe I've ever seen you get your ass kicked so badly.
>
> Regards,
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
nemo_outis wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:ae9ee50c01782b4fbd6fc89b61779692@dizum.com:
>
>
> > Actually, there's all sorts of hardware based encryption for hard
> > drives. AES256 is becoming pretty popular in replacement notebook
> > drives I hear. As to "back doors", I'll happily leave that to the
> > conspiracy nuts. It's not relevant to this particular debate anyway.
>
> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
obvious reasons.
Take your arguing for the sake of arguing and shove it. Nobody cares to
hear it.
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it
Re: Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
I haven't been paying much attention to this thread, just showing back up.
"George Orwell" <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:4955767a4780e41c11a89a77666c9796@mixmaster.it ...
> nemo_outis wrote:
>
>> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
>> news:ae9ee50c01782b4fbd6fc89b61779692@dizum.com:
>>
>>
>> > Actually, there's all sorts of hardware based encryption for hard
>> > drives. AES256 is becoming pretty popular in replacement notebook
>> > drives I hear. As to "back doors", I'll happily leave that to the
>> > conspiracy nuts. It's not relevant to this particular debate anyway.
>>
>> Hard disk encryption currently suffers from problems
>
> Bullshit. HardWARE encryption has historically been not only more
> secure and robust, but considerably faster than software encryption for
> obvious reasons.
I actually have to agree with Nomen on this one. The hardware systems
available are widely inferior. I won't name any names (mostly because I'm
trying to forget about them) but there has been suppliers of "secure"
hardware hard disk encryption alternatives that were enormously insecure.
The errors have been everything from a fixed key across all devices, to
using ECB, to "accidently" creating a broadcast antennae out of the key
transport, often combining multiple problems in a single product. With
knowledge of such mistakes having been made, I would say that hard disk
encryption "suffers from problems" when performed in hardware.
Joe