Can anyone explain how these headers "don't match up"?
-------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Any Phone Safe?
References:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Message-ID: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:217848
Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
-------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggplant@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To:
abuse@newshosting.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:217882
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com:A vortex formed within the
smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
> why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
> terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
> Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
the airwaves.
--------------------------------
From: traveler 66 <nore...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: nore...@nym.alias.net
Organization: Anonymous
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:12:39 -0800
Message-ID: <gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: admi...@privacy.li
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:217907
On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant© wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com:A vortex formed within the
> smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
>> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
>> why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
>> terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
>> Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
> The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
> knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
> phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
> apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
> the airwaves.
Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your area for
you.
---------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:217912
traveler 66 wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>=20
> > Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
> > news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com:A vortex formed
> > within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> >=20
> >> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
> >> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline?
> >> Why or why not. Anyone who believes that the government only
> >> listens to terrorists I think is really taking a big risk
> >> especially if they are on Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
> >>=20
> >=20
> > The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are=20
> > knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a
> > cell phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws
> > that would apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was
> > sent openly over the airwaves.
>=20
> Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your
> area for you.
Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
LOL!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 16:46:13 GMT
Lines: 49
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:218035
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@dizum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> traveler 66 wrote:
>> On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>>=20
>> > Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
>> > news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com:A vortex formed
>> > within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>> >=20
>> >> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
>> >> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline?
>> >> Why or why not. Anyone who believes that the government only
>> >> listens to terrorists I think is really taking a big risk
>> >> especially if they are on Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
>> >>=20
>> >=20
>> > The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are=
20
>> > knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a
>> > cell phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws
>> > that would apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was
>> > sent openly over the airwaves.
>>=20
>> Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your
>> area for you.
> Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
> the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
> so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
> Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
> ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
> don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
> How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
> LOL!
WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse issues).
I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond being
a very satified customer with prili. Nothing has come back to haunt me at
all. Who ever said the laws don't matter? Having to put words in peoples
mouths to try to look wise again I see. When do you offer anything to
help anyone? You're just a troll.
------------------------------------
From: Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca>
X-Anonymous: yes
X-Anon-Help: <http://www.deuxpi.ca/>
<mailto:deuxpi-ad...@deuxpi.ca>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
Message-ID: <29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:23:00 -0500 (EST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:218044
Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
> news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@dizum.com:A vortex formed
> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>=20
> > traveler 66 wrote:
<CLIP>
> WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse
> issues).
>=20
> I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedofuck pervert called
Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
fucktarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
<29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggpl...@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 21:57:02 GMT
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Xref: authen.puce.readfreenews.net alt.privacy:218045
Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
news:29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a94d@deuxpi.ca:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
>> news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@dizum.com:A vortex formed
>> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>>=20
>> > traveler 66 wrote:
> <CLIP>
>> WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse
>> issues).
>>=20
>> I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!
> Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
> So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedofuck pervert called
> Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
> fucktarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
> sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
> Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
> LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
Boy are you a moron. I'd use remailers for everything and stay anonymous
if I were going to be 2 people. Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my
Xnews. But I don't use remailers. You're way off base as usual.
-------------------------------------
** The Truth About Cotse.Nut ** 
Linear Mode
