Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.internet.wireless
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2005, 03:35 PM
Marcel Joustra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 802.11 B&G

If i have an accesspoint 80211 G, but have multiple clients using B or
G, will the clients using G have slower rates?


Kind regards,

Marcel
--
Posted by news://news.nb.nu

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2005, 03:56 PM
NetSteady
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G

Some access points have this issue. With most, if you have 99% G
clients, and one B client, everything will go down to B rates.

however, I believe Meru Networks (for enterprise systems) have a new
setup where it doesnt matter the speed of the client.

Chris


Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2005, 09:03 PM
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G

"Marcel Joustra" wrote in message ...
> If i have an accesspoint 80211 G, but have multiple clients using B or
> G, will the clients using G have slower rates?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Marcel


It really depends on the hardware, and perhaps more-so, on the manufacturer.

Remember that each manufacturer usually have some proprietary "turbo rates"
in addition to "standard rates".

I can only comment on how D-Link handles different rates and schemes, as I'm
only familiar with D-Link -- but would assume other manafucturers would be
similiar.

With my D-Link stuff (couple routers and many AP's, repeaters, ect -- mix of
802.11a/b/g):

* On an 802.11g SSID, if all the clients connected support D-Link's "turbo
rate", they will get 108Mbs.
(Well, not really, 108Mbs is the theoretical limit. In a clean room, maybe,
but in real world obviously its much lower.)

* While all those 802.11g "turbo" clients are connected (108Mbs), if an
additional 802.11g client connects that can't support "turbo" then
everything falls back to standard 54Mbs.

or

* While all those 802.11g "turbo" clients are connected (108Mbs), if an
802.11b (standard 11Mbs or 22Mbs "turbo") connects to that SSID, then all
the 802.11g clients fall back to 54Mbs and the 802.11b will see 11Mbs or
22Mbs (if it supports 802.11b "turbo").

-

My 802.11a's work the exact same way, with the first and second statements
above -- just subsitute 802.11a for 802.11g. Obviously, there wouldn't be
the third statement for 802.11a

So -- to answer your question, at least for my D-Link stuff here, an 802.11b
client connecting to an 802.11g SSID would not effect "standard rates", but
it would disable "turbo rates".

Some other things that my be useful or not:

For the AP's that I want SSID's to be able to use "turbo", they must be on
channel 6 for 802.11g and (I forget offhand) also the center channel for
802.11a. (With the proprietary "turbo", its actually using all of channels
for bandwidth.)

With my tri-band AP's (802.11a/g/b) capable of being used as repeaters, I
can repeat one band and maintain "turbo", but if I want to repeat two bands
then "turbo" is disabled and they will be at standard vanilla rates.

Hopefully that wasn't clear as mud... :^)

Cheers
Eric



Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2005, 04:08 AM
F. Plant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G


"Eric" <nospam@nospam.nospam.not> wrote in message
news:p2mVe.20538$uD6.20132@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com. ..
snip
>
> * While all those 802.11g "turbo" clients are connected (108Mbs), if an
> 802.11b (standard 11Mbs or 22Mbs "turbo") connects to that SSID, then all
> the 802.11g clients fall back to 54Mbs and the 802.11b will see 11Mbs or
> 22Mbs (if it supports 802.11b "turbo").
>
> -
>
> My 802.11a's work the exact same way, with the first and second statements
> above -- just subsitute 802.11a for 802.11g. Obviously, there wouldn't be
> the third statement for 802.11a
>
> So -- to answer your question, at least for my D-Link stuff here, an

802.11b
> client connecting to an 802.11g SSID would not effect "standard rates",

but
> it would disable "turbo rates".
>
> Some other things that my be useful or not:
>
> For the AP's that I want SSID's to be able to use "turbo", they must be on
> channel 6 for 802.11g and (I forget offhand) also the center channel for
> 802.11a. (With the proprietary "turbo", its actually using all of

channels
> for bandwidth.)
>
> With my tri-band AP's (802.11a/g/b) capable of being used as repeaters, I
> can repeat one band and maintain "turbo", but if I want to repeat two

bands
> then "turbo" is disabled and they will be at standard vanilla rates.
>
> Hopefully that wasn't clear as mud... :^)
>
> Cheers
> Eric
>
>


On a slightly different vein, if you were to connect a dlink turbo b card to
a dlink non turbo g router do you get 11Mbps for the b card?

F. Plant



Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2005, 05:08 AM
Marcel Joustra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G

In article <p2mVe.20538$uD6.20132@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>,
nospam@nospam.nospam.not says...


>
> Hopefully that wasn't clear as mud... :^)
>
> Cheers
> Eric
>
>
>


Hi Eric,

It is very clear, but in contradiction to another poster in this group.
All my stuff is Senao, not in turbo mode. I gues i have to give it a
try. I replace my B accesspoint to a G (only B clients until now), and i
will connect a G client also to it. Simple as it is.

Thanks for your comment,


Marcel
--
Posted by news://news.nb.nu

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2005, 05:28 AM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:35:21 +0200, Marcel Joustra
<mrf.joustra@ditweghavank.nl> wrote:

>If i have an accesspoint 80211 G, but have multiple clients using B or
>G, will the clients using G have slower rates?


You'll see a slowdown in 802.11g even if there's no traffic to the
802.11b clients.

In general, the max thruput for 802.11g gets cut in half in the
presence of 802.11b. What happens is that the 802.11g access point
has to occasionally switch to 802.11b in order to detect 802.11b
transmissions. That's because *ALL* management packets for 802.11b
are at the slowest speed of 1Mbit/sec. If the access point doesn't
hear anything on 802.11b, it just goes back to 802.11g mode after
about 200msec. However, if it hears just one 802.11b broadcast or
packet, it will sit there waiting for 802.11b data for perhaps 3-5
seconds. That's a huge amount of time to not move any 802.11g data.
If you're transferring data at full 802.11g speeds, and just one
802.11b packet drifts by, you stop for a long time. There's also the
possibility of packet collisions if the 802.11b transmissions do not
coincide with when the access point is listening for 802.11b packets.
Obviously, the 802.11b client radio cannot hear 802.11g transmissions.

This is stolen from an Atheros PDF at:
http://www.atheros.com/pt/atheros_range_whitepaper.pdf
with some additions and corrections by me.

Non-overlapping Modulation Max Max Max
Channels ------- | Link TCP UDP
| | | | |
802.11b 3 CCK 11 5.9 7.1
802.11g (with
802.11b) 3 OFDM/CCK 54 14.4 19.5
802.11g only 3 OFDM 54 24.4 30.5
802.11g turbo 1 OFDM 108 42.9 54.8
802.11a 13 OFDM 54 24.4 30.5
802.11a turbo 6 OFDM 108 42.9 54.8

The paper claims that encryption is enabled for these calculations,
but my numbers seem to indicate that these number are for encryption
disabled. Dunno for sure. The Max TCP and Max UDP are the
theoretical maximum thruput rates.

There are various chipsets that claim to have "solved" the
compatibility issue. At best, they tinker with the timing and b/g
selection algorithms. I've seen improvements, but not solutions.
Meru claims they have solved the problem by "masking" the two
protocols from each other. I can't find any details on their web
pile:
> http://www.merunetworks.com


The important thing to remember is that even with an 802.11b induced
slowdown, the 802.11g units operate much faster than the best that can
be done with just 802.11b. Also, most 802.11g users cannot maintain a
maximum speed connection and will be running at one of the lower
speeds. Therefore, you might not even notice a slowdown.
> http://searchnetworking.techtarget.c...003124,00.html




--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831.336.2558 voice Skype: JeffLiebermann
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
# http://802.11junk.com
# jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# jeffl@cruzio.com

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:14 PM
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 802.11 B&G


"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
> >If i have an accesspoint 80211 G, but have multiple clients using B or
> >G, will the clients using G have slower rates?

>
> You'll see a slowdown in 802.11g even if there's no traffic to the
> 802.11b clients.


Hi,

I stand corrected on my previous post.
Overlooked the switching and extra overhead... Makes perfect sense.

Thanks for keeping me honest.

Eric
"...but the little icons still say they are connected at 108Mbs" :^)





Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monitor mode 802.11 on Windows Richard Kaszeta alt.internet.wireless 4 11-12-2006 12:40 PM
802.11 Probe Requests Benjamin M. Stocks alt.internet.wireless 1 09-14-2006 04:04 PM
Long range 802.11 kit for auction... Tom Ierna alt.internet.wireless 2 08-13-2005 02:57 PM
CDMA v 802.11 sam1967 alt.internet.wireless 2 07-16-2005 08:16 PM
Smart 802.11 optik Interesting Links 0 05-06-2004 09:11 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45