Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.internet.wireless
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2007, 01:58 PM
steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which Antenna should I buy ??

I have a situation where I want to increase the signal of a wireless
router to another building.

They are both two story buildings on a campus. Wall ---- To Wall 125
feet. I think I would put the broadcasting antenna on the second story
of the first building. The building I want to broadcast to is a about
100 feet long 50 feet deep. The signal will be hitting the longest
part of the building. In other words imagine that building is a
rectangle, the signal as I imagine it will be broadcast to the long
part of rectangle/building, so the whole building. This wall is made
of brick and has several windows in it. (its a residence)

I have been looking at a couple of Antennas. Unfortunetely when I call
the companies they are not all that helpfull on what I need. Im hoping
you all can give me some help.

Here are a few Antennas I have found.

Hawking tech HSB2
Specs (im not sure what it all means but I will put down some of what
they feature)
Gain: Up to 27 dBm
Output 100/200/500mW (seems that you can adjust it)
Input power 8dBm min; 18dBm max
Receiver Gain 10-13dBm, 12 dBm Typical
(I think? i just attche it to my existing router by removing an
antnenna)

Hawking tech HAO14SDP
14dBi outdoor directional antenna
(they say this can go 2 miles. This is really too much for me. Im not
trying to broadcast NBC, but they have a huge selection of products
and I really dont know which would be right)

USROBOTICS
USR5482A Outdoor antenna
Gain 9dBi (they also have a 14dBi

Has anyone had any expereince in this and can they provide me with
what might be right in my situation.

Thanks.


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2007, 05:04 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

On 27 Jan 2007 05:58:28 -0800, "steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> wrote in
<1169906308.246393.269470@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>:

>I have a situation where I want to increase the signal of a wireless
>router to another building.
>
>They are both two story buildings on a campus. Wall ---- To Wall 125
>feet. I think I would put the broadcasting antenna on the second story
>of the first building. The building I want to broadcast to is a about
>100 feet long 50 feet deep. The signal will be hitting the longest
>part of the building. In other words imagine that building is a
>rectangle, the signal as I imagine it will be broadcast to the long
>part of rectangle/building, so the whole building. This wall is made
>of brick and has several windows in it. (its a residence)
>
>I have been looking at a couple of Antennas. Unfortunetely when I call
>the companies they are not all that helpfull on what I need. Im hoping
>you all can give me some help.


You need to start by determining the angle of coverage you need. With a
distance of 125 feet and a width of 100 feet, you need almost 45 degrees
of beam width, which will limit the amount of gain.

>Here are a few Antennas I have found.
>
>Hawking tech HSB2


That's a signal booster, and while that might help _sending_ to your
wireless clients, it won't help on the _receiving_ from your wireless
clients, and so probably isn't a good way to go. (A high-gain antenna
helps on both sending and receiving.)

>Hawking tech HAO14SDP


14 dBi. Beam width of 30 degrees is too narrow for your application.

A better choice would be the 9 dBi HAO9SDP, with a beam width of 70
degrees horizontal and 65 degrees vertical. Minimize the length of the
coax cable connection for best results.

Since a brick wall is hard for Wi-Fi to penetrate, wireless clients in
the second building may still need antenna placements in windows or
directional high-gain antennas.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2007, 05:36 PM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

"steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> hath wroth:

>I have a situation where I want to increase the signal of a wireless
>router to another building.
>
>They are both two story buildings on a campus. Wall ---- To Wall 125
>feet. I think I would put the broadcasting antenna on the second story
>of the first building. The building I want to broadcast to is a about
>100 feet long 50 feet deep. The signal will be hitting the longest
>part of the building. In other words imagine that building is a
>rectangle, the signal as I imagine it will be broadcast to the long
>part of rectangle/building, so the whole building. This wall is made
>of brick and has several windows in it. (its a residence)


I think I understand what you're doing. You want to "illuminate" the
entire 100ft length of the building from 125ft away. That's a very
common configuration that I use for setting up wireless in large
residential complexes from the outside. The only gotcha are where
there are wire screens or metalized mylar on the windows.

I also would need to know the height of the building for what I have
in mind, but I'll just guess the usual 3 stories or about 30ft ft.
You're obviously in a college so we're going to do this as a math
exercise instead of a shopping exercise.

Horiz angle = 2 * tan-1 (50/125) = 2 * 22 deg = 44 degrees
Vert angle = 2 * tan-1 (15/125) = 2 * 7 deg = 14 degrees

So, what you need is an antenna with a horizontal radiation angle of
about 44 degrees and vertical radiation angle of at least 14 degrees.
This is commonly known as a sector antenna. It covers a wide
horizontal area, but has limited vertical coverage. However, typical
sector antennas are usually 90, 120, or 150 degree horizontal
coverage, so that's not exactly going to work. It's also impossible
to calculate the required antenna gain because you didn't bother to
specify:
1. What equipment you currently have?
2. How far into the building you plan to penetrate?
3. What radios are at the other end of your "broadcasting" (laptops)?
4. What thruput were you expecting?
5. Are there any obstructions in the line of sight. In my experience
there are always a few overgrown trees blocking the view.
(Hint: Numbers, not prose). When you're ready to supply some data
and more numbers, we can calculate the required gain using the
procedure in:
<http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi#Link_Calculations>

A sloppy first choice would be whatever antenna has a 44 degree
beamwidth in both directions. To keep it simple, a panel or patch
antenna has a fairly symmetrical pattern that varies only with gain.
Very roughly for panels:
gain (dBi) -3dB beamwidth (degrees)
8.5 60
10 45
13 38
19 18
So, if you don't care about the wasted RF in the vertical direction, a
10dBi panel antenna is the highest gain you can buy and still
illuminate the entire 100ft x 30ft side of the building.

<http://www.fab-corp.com/home.php?cat=255>
<http://www.pacwireless.com>
<http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/antennas_2400.php>

If you do care about the wasted RF, a sector antenna is more
appropriate. These tend to be custom or home built as each
installation is quite different. I suggest you look into building a
Franklin antenna. See:
<http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/>
<http://www.brest-wireless.net/wiki/materiel:amos>
<http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/vhf_ant.htm>
The problem with these are that the angles do not match your
arrangement. The advantage to these is that you can concentrate more
of your power into a rectangular illumination pattern (i.e. more
gain). One of the examples has a 125 degree horizontal beamwidth, the
correct 15 degree vertical beamwidth, and about 13dBi of gain. That
will illuminate more of the area, at a substantial increase in gain,
with a highly desirable reduction in vertical angle to prevent ground
reflections and wasted energy transmitting to the sky.

>I have been looking at a couple of Antennas. Unfortunetely when I call
>the companies they are not all that helpfull on what I need. Im hoping
>you all can give me some help.


Numbers and calculations first, then go shopping. Once you know how
much gain and beamwidth you need, the choice of antennas will be
obvious.


--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2007, 06:42 PM
Chuck Olson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??


"Jeff Liebermann" <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote in message
news:mg1nr21pa61pou84vs37jd994l5d1r6c9l@4ax.com...
> "steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> hath wroth:
>
> >I have a situation where I want to increase the signal of a wireless
> >router to another building.
> >
> >They are both two story buildings on a campus. Wall ---- To Wall 125
> >feet. I think I would put the broadcasting antenna on the second story
> >of the first building. The building I want to broadcast to is a about
> >100 feet long 50 feet deep. The signal will be hitting the longest
> >part of the building. In other words imagine that building is a
> >rectangle, the signal as I imagine it will be broadcast to the long
> >part of rectangle/building, so the whole building. This wall is made
> >of brick and has several windows in it. (its a residence)

>
> I think I understand what you're doing. You want to "illuminate" the
> entire 100ft length of the building from 125ft away. That's a very
> common configuration that I use for setting up wireless in large
> residential complexes from the outside. The only gotcha are where
> there are wire screens or metalized mylar on the windows.
>
> I also would need to know the height of the building for what I have
> in mind, but I'll just guess the usual 3 stories or about 30ft ft.
> You're obviously in a college so we're going to do this as a math
> exercise instead of a shopping exercise.
>
> Horiz angle = 2 * tan-1 (50/125) = 2 * 22 deg = 44 degrees
> Vert angle = 2 * tan-1 (15/125) = 2 * 7 deg = 14 degrees
>
> So, what you need is an antenna with a horizontal radiation angle of
> about 44 degrees and vertical radiation angle of at least 14 degrees.
> This is commonly known as a sector antenna. It covers a wide
> horizontal area, but has limited vertical coverage. However, typical
> sector antennas are usually 90, 120, or 150 degree horizontal
> coverage, so that's not exactly going to work. It's also impossible
> to calculate the required antenna gain because you didn't bother to
> specify:
> 1. What equipment you currently have?
> 2. How far into the building you plan to penetrate?
> 3. What radios are at the other end of your "broadcasting" (laptops)?
> 4. What thruput were you expecting?
> 5. Are there any obstructions in the line of sight. In my experience
> there are always a few overgrown trees blocking the view.
> (Hint: Numbers, not prose). When you're ready to supply some data
> and more numbers, we can calculate the required gain using the
> procedure in:
> <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi#Link_Calculations>
>
> A sloppy first choice would be whatever antenna has a 44 degree
> beamwidth in both directions. To keep it simple, a panel or patch
> antenna has a fairly symmetrical pattern that varies only with gain.
> Very roughly for panels:
> gain (dBi) -3dB beamwidth (degrees)
> 8.5 60
> 10 45
> 13 38
> 19 18
> So, if you don't care about the wasted RF in the vertical direction, a
> 10dBi panel antenna is the highest gain you can buy and still
> illuminate the entire 100ft x 30ft side of the building.
>
> <http://www.fab-corp.com/home.php?cat=255>
> <http://www.pacwireless.com>
> <http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/antennas_2400.php>
>
> If you do care about the wasted RF, a sector antenna is more
> appropriate. These tend to be custom or home built as each
> installation is quite different. I suggest you look into building a
> Franklin antenna. See:
> <http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/>
> <http://www.brest-wireless.net/wiki/materiel:amos>
> <http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/vhf_ant.htm>
> The problem with these are that the angles do not match your
> arrangement. The advantage to these is that you can concentrate more
> of your power into a rectangular illumination pattern (i.e. more
> gain). One of the examples has a 125 degree horizontal beamwidth, the
> correct 15 degree vertical beamwidth, and about 13dBi of gain. That
> will illuminate more of the area, at a substantial increase in gain,
> with a highly desirable reduction in vertical angle to prevent ground
> reflections and wasted energy transmitting to the sky.
>
> >I have been looking at a couple of Antennas. Unfortunetely when I call
> >the companies they are not all that helpfull on what I need. Im hoping
> >you all can give me some help.

>
> Numbers and calculations first, then go shopping. Once you know how
> much gain and beamwidth you need, the choice of antennas will be
> obvious.
>
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
> 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558


Superb answer, Jeff. I would just add that a trial antenna that's very easy
to build might clarify the problems he might run into. I would suggest he
put together a Biquad antenna http://martybugs.net/wireless/biquad/ and see
how well that works. It will have some gain compared to a dipole and fairly
wide beamwidth. It might also be desirable to build a few for users in the
building who have external antenna connections to improve their hookup
reliability.

Chuck



Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 12:37 PM
steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??



> >Hawking tech HSB2That's a signal booster, and while that might help _sending_ to your

> wireless clients, it won't help on the _receiving_ from your wireless


Very Good point Ive been thinking so much about gettng the signal
there not back.


> A better choice would be the 9 dBi HAO9SDP, with a beam width of 70
> degrees horizontal and 65 degrees vertical. Minimize the length of the
> coax cable connection for best results.

Probably then what you would suggest is two HAO9SDP's and and a signal
booster. eg.
Router ----HAO9DP *********HAO9DP---Router(?? or somthing) Then have
to figure out what to do in the building.


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 12:45 PM
steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

Wow,

Well a few additions,
Building I suppose is 35 -30 feet high.

> You're obviously in a college so we're going to do this as a math
> exercise instead of a shopping exercise.

Well no college was about 30 years ago for me.
Didnt have computers when I went to college.

> Horiz angle = 2 * tan-1 (50/125) = 2 * 22 deg = 44 degrees
> Vert angle = 2 * tan-1 (15/125) = 2 * 7 deg = 14 degrees
>



> 1. What equipment you currently have?

Just a wireless us robotics router right now. Mostly doesnt work.

> 2. How far into the building you plan to penetrate?

Prety much whole building but dont mind a few dead spots.

> 3. What radios are at the other end of your "broadcasting" (laptops)?

Not sure what you mean?
> 4. What thruput were you expecting?

Hadnt that about this. Basically this is just for surfing. We only
have a dsl line coming to the the school fo offices etc.
> 5. Are there any obstructions in the line of sight. In my experience

No its pretty clear.

Something someone said above which I wasnt considering was that the
clients are going to have to send the signal back to the main building
this sounds like I will need hardware at both ends. eg not just one
antenna and expect laptops and desktops to reach it. Am I right in my
thinking? So I would have to buy two antena's and other hardware for
the residence.
regards


Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:12 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

On 28 Jan 2007 04:37:25 -0800, "steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> wrote in
<1169987845.565645.260150@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups. com>:

>> A better choice would be the 9 dBi HAO9SDP, with a beam width of 70
>> degrees horizontal and 65 degrees vertical. Minimize the length of the
>> coax cable connection for best results.


>Probably then what you would suggest is two HAO9SDP's and and a signal
>booster. eg.
>Router ----HAO9DP *********HAO9DP---Router(?? or somthing) Then have
>to figure out what to do in the building.


I'd start off with just one HAO9SDP installed on the first building for
the wireless host (access point/router), and then I'd do a site survey
in the second building to see what's needed for the various wireless
clients to connect reliably. Some may be able to get by with a standard
wireless setup. Others might need something like the Hawking HWU8DD
Hi-Gain USB Wireless-G Dish Adapter.
<http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=60&ProdID=280>
Or something in between.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:26 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

On 28 Jan 2007 04:45:52 -0800, "steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> wrote in
<1169988351.965634.278310@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups. com>:

>> 3. What radios are at the other end of your "broadcasting" (laptops)?

>Not sure what you mean?


Laptops with built-in wireless?
Laptops with USB Wi-Fi dongles?
Desktops with PCI Wi-Fi adapters?
What kind of antennas?

>> 4. What thruput were you expecting?

>Hadnt that about this. Basically this is just for surfing. We only
>have a dsl line coming to the the school fo offices etc.


A single DSL line may not go far when shared. My experience is that you
may well run into problems of (a) bandwidth hogs [e.g., illicit
filesharing] and/or (b) hacking [student A breaking into the computer of
student B, or the administration, just for the "fun" of it]. Thus I
strongly recommend getting a wireless router with (a) isolation [so
students can only access the Internet, not each other or the
administration] and (b) QoS (Quality of Service, so no one student can
hog all the bandwidth). A good way to do that for relative cheap is to
run DD-WRT firmware (properly configured) in something like the Buffalo
WHR-HP-G54 (a good choice because of higher power and the ability to run
DD-WRT firmware). Figure on having to spend a fair amount of time each
month sorting out these issues.

>Something someone said above which I wasnt considering was that the
>clients are going to have to send the signal back to the main building
>this sounds like I will need hardware at both ends. eg not just one
>antenna and expect laptops and desktops to reach it. Am I right in my
>thinking? So I would have to buy two antena's and other hardware for
>the residence.


That depends. A good external panel antenna on the host building may be
sufficient for at least some wireless clients using standard wireless
adapters, whereas others (e.g., at the back of the client building) may
need high-gain antennas. Run a site survey in the client building after
the host wireless is installed in the host building to see what you need
for each wireless client. Your worst case is that you may need wireless
repeating (WDS) in the client building.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 05:15 PM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

"steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> hath wroth:

>Building I suppose is 35 -30 feet high.


Ok, increase the vertical angle to:
Vert angle = 2 * tan-1 (35/125) = 2 * 15.6 deg = 31 degrees
That will be a problem for my recommended AMOS antenna. 44 degrees
horizontal and 31 degrees vertical is almost symmetrical enough to use
a common patch, panel, biquad, coffee can, or similar antenna. I
would also recommend trying a biquad.

>> You're obviously in a college so we're going to do this as a math
>> exercise instead of a shopping exercise.

>Well no college was about 30 years ago for me.
>Didnt have computers when I went to college.


Sorry. Bad guess. However, you still get to do the math. Dust off
your abacus or slide rule (I still use mine ocassionally).

Have you considered getting the students involved in this exercise? In
the past, I was seeing professional installs contracted by the
administration. Recently, I'm seeing a few student inspired and
managed systems.

>> 1. What equipment you currently have?

>Just a wireless us robotics router right now. Mostly doesnt work.


Purchase a router that works.

>> 2. How far into the building you plan to penetrate?

>Prety much whole building but dont mind a few dead spots.


It won't work. You'll get reasonable penetration near the windows and
into the rooms facing the outside but nothing in the interior rooms,
hallways, or rooms on the other side of the building. 2.4GHz does not
penetrate building structures very well. You mention the building is
50ft wide, which I guess(tm) means two rooms and a center hallway. The
hallway and the rooms on the other side of the building are going to
be dead spots.

>> 3. What radios are at the other end of your "broadcasting" (laptops)?

>Not sure what you mean?


It takes two to tango. You have a malfunctional SMC wireless router.
What type of computers are going to be talking to this wireless
router? Laptops? Desktops? Are they going to be able to use
external antennas that can see your malfunctional SMC wireless router?

>> 4. What thruput were you expecting?

>Hadnt that about this. Basically this is just for surfing. We only
>have a dsl line coming to the the school fo offices etc.


It's important because range varies with speed. The slower speeds
will go furthur. You can also trade speed for reliability. My
guess(tm) is that your DSL line run about 1.5Mbits/sec. Therefore, I
suggest a connection speed of 6Mbits/sec 802.11g OFDM which will offer
the most range. This would be a key component of calculating the
whether this will work.

>> 5. Are there any obstructions in the line of sight. In my experience

>No its pretty clear.


>Something someone said above which I wasnt considering was that the
>clients are going to have to send the signal back to the main building
>this sounds like I will need hardware at both ends. eg not just one
>antenna and expect laptops and desktops to reach it. Am I right in my
>thinking? So I would have to buy two antena's and other hardware for
>the residence.


Yes. The clients will need a wireless device of some sort to connect
to your malfunctional SMC wireless router. It takes two to tango.
What John Navas was aluding to was that you should not use a power
amplifier at just one end. It only increases the range in one
direction. It doesn't help if you can't hear the return signals.
Incidentally, such an amplified system is called an "alligator" or an
animal with a big mouth and small ears. If you need more range, it
should be done first with antennas, which increase the gain in BOTH
directions equally.

There's also a realistic limit to how many users can connect to your
system. It really depends on what they're doing. My rule-of-thumb
is:
100 light web and email users
10 business users
1 file sharing user
Think about how you're going to administer and police this system. I
can supply details if interested. Hardware is the least of your
problems.

Suggestions:
1. Find a wireless router that works.
2. Connect literally any directional antenna with a gain between 8
and 12dBi to the wireless router. Place it in the proposed location.
3. Find a laptop and do what's called a site survey. That's where
you walk around and see how well you can connect in the intended
coverage area. If you want to do it with some cool but pricy
software, see:
<http://www.ekahau.com/?id=4600>
Otherwise, use Netstumbler or iStumbler to check for coverage.

4. If building penetration is difficult, give up on wireless, and do
it another way. 150ft is not very far and can easily be handled with
CAT5 or fiber optic cable. If you must have wireless in the
building, sprinkle a few around the building and perhaps use wireless
for a point to point backhaul.
5. If the buildings have a common CATV, phone line system or AC power
line, then these can be used as an alternative method.
http://www.homepna.com
http://www.homeplug.com
http://www.multilet.com

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2007, 04:14 AM
steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

Alligator , Good analogy. I may use it. I guess what you really want
is two ducks, quacking at each other.

Im going to start with an antenna. Then do a survey and see how it
looks. Then perhaps add more hardware. I will also encourage students
to get cheap boosters for their computers. You know, plug in a usb
cable and a little external unit they can move around.

I Agree the CAT5 is the best option and I have looked at this.
Although its not the easiest to string cable to. I have never seen
outdoor cable ?? This is something that I would like to work towards.

Thanks.


Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2007, 05:05 AM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Antenna should I buy ??

On 1 Feb 2007 20:14:01 -0800, "steve" <stevesemple@lycos.com> wrote:

>I Agree the CAT5 is the best option and I have looked at this.
>Although its not the easiest to string cable to. I have never seen
>outdoor cable ?? This is something that I would like to work towards.


There are various forms of CAT5 that can be used. Buriable CAT5
usually has a shield, heavy rubber jacket, and is filled with yucky
silicon gel to keep the water out. You can also get it armoured if
you have a gopher or squirrel problem.

Gel filled "flooded" CAT5:
<http://websvr.commscope.com/CommScope/Eng/specsheets2.nsf/0/c6d09ba0775c9b13852563780067a0df/$FILE/5NF4.pdf>
<http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=7629>
<http://www.cat5ecableguy.com/outdoor_bulk_cable?b=1>
Lots's more. Do some Googling.

However, I cheat. I snake ordinary CAT5 through PVC conduit, flex
black irrigation pipe, or if desperate, garden hose. We have a
neighborhood wired/wireless LAN with almost every type of cable
possible. There's coax cable (RG-6/u and RG-58a/u), aerial coax with
a messenger wire, dual mode fiber, CAT5 in 1/2" PVC conduit (under the
road), direct burial CAT5, and armoured CAT5 through the trees. If
the surplus scrap dealers have it (cheap), I'll used it. It all works
quite well. The biggest dangers are falling branches, squirrels, wood
rats, and clueless neighbors bearing chain saws.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which antenna? dragon NZ Wireless 4 07-27-2007 08:42 AM
Dual Antenna Question mgober Wireless Networking Discussion 0 01-13-2007 09:26 PM
dipole bjs555 alt.internet.wireless 12 10-11-2005 04:09 AM
Attaching antenna to Belkin 802.11g PCMCIA card read.ishmael@gmail.com alt.internet.wireless 0 09-13-2005 10:17 PM
any comments? any ideas? alt.internet.wireless 3 07-17-2005 11:48 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45