Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.internet.wireless
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2012, 09:15 PM
Warren Oates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cisco "Small Business"

Does anyone have any experience with this router:

Cisco WRVS4400N
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9931/index.html>
--

.... do not cover a warm kettle or your stock may sour. -- Julia Child

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2012, 10:20 PM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cisco "Small Business"

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:15:01 -0400, Warren Oates
<warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:

>Does anyone have any experience with this router:
>Cisco WRVS4400N
><http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9931/index.html>


Sorta. A friend has a client that uses 4 of those to form a VPN and
for remote access. He had trouble setting them up, so I logged in
remotely and fixed it. I had plenty of trouble trying to figure out
the IPSEC VPN settings for 3 tunnels. The problem was the usual
subnet mistake. Make sure each remote network is on a unique subnet.
For example, a 4 node system would have:
192.168.101.xxx
192.168.102.xxx
192.168.103.xxx
192.168.104.xxx
It will somewhat function with everything on the same subnet but it's
much easier and more reliable if every remote office has its own
subnet and not have to deal with duplicate IP's. Same with remote
users calling into via the VPN. Make sure that none of the subnets
duplicate the callers home network or you'll get irate calls for
stupid things like his network printer or NAS box doesn't work when he
connects. That means don't use 0, 1, or 2 for the 3rd octet.

I didn't try connecting more than one remote user to the built in VPN
servers at a time, so I don't have any performance numbers. In the
past, previous Linksys consumer routers just didn't have the
horsepower to handle more than one IPSEC VPN connection at a time.

You might want to look at the emulator to see what you're getting
into:
<http://ui.linksys.com/files/WRVS4400N/1.00.12/vpn_main.htm>

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:00 AM
Warren Oates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cisco "Small Business"

In article <aeuf385oerbrm46s3joro47mc5b3c77q40@4ax.com>,
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

> Sorta. A friend has a client that uses 4 of those to form a VPN and
> for remote access. He had trouble setting them up, so I logged in
> remotely and fixed it. I had plenty of trouble trying to figure out
> the IPSEC VPN settings for 3 tunnels. The problem was the usual
> subnet mistake. Make sure each remote network is on a unique subnet.
> For example, a 4 node system would have:
> 192.168.101.xxx
> 192.168.102.xxx
> 192.168.103.xxx
> 192.168.104.xxx
> It will somewhat function with everything on the same subnet but it's
> much easier and more reliable if every remote office has its own
> subnet and not have to deal with duplicate IP's. Same with remote
> users calling into via the VPN. Make sure that none of the subnets
> duplicate the callers home network or you'll get irate calls for
> stupid things like his network printer or NAS box doesn't work when he
> connects. That means don't use 0, 1, or 2 for the 3rd octet.
>
> I didn't try connecting more than one remote user to the built in VPN
> servers at a time, so I don't have any performance numbers. In the
> past, previous Linksys consumer routers just didn't have the
> horsepower to handle more than one IPSEC VPN connection at a time.
>
> You might want to look at the emulator to see what you're getting
> into:
> <http://ui.linksys.com/files/WRVS4400N/1.00.12/vpn_main.htm>


Excellent! Thank you sir!
--

.... do not cover a warm kettle or your stock may sour. -- Julia Child

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shang332, A 32 port ATA with cisco callmanager weedsgrace@gmail.com uk.telecom.voip 1 05-03-2008 01:37 PM
good pings, slow data transfer. rel alt.internet.wireless 8 08-13-2005 06:32 AM
Cisco IPv6 Vulnerability Imhotep alt.computer.security 0 08-01-2005 06:23 PM
NEW PRODUCT! The Headset Adapter for Cisco IP phones Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer uk.telecom.voip 2 07-31-2005 06:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45