On 27 Oct 2005 14:42:27 -0700,
arvind_c_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>I was under the impression that some of the nodes could be stationary.
>It wasn't meant to be a trick question. I was hoping someone would
>point me to some link which would help me decide about the simulation
>models. Thanks for the link.
You didn't answer my question(s). Is this an 802.11b/g ad-hoc
network? If so, you're limited to 9 nodes. However, if it's a Zigbee
or MANET network:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html
the number of nodes is much much larger. To the best of my
recollection, Zigbee is assumed to be all mobile with no stationary
nodes, even though some might not move for quite a while.
Some of the nodes may be stationary. However, if you're using
Radio-Mobile:
http://www.cplus.org/rmw/english1.html
for modelling your network coverage (not thruput), you don't really
need to distinguish between base and mobiles. The only real
difference is the equipment, feedline, and antenna definitions.
As for helping you "decide" on a simulation model, it would be helpful
to know what you're simulating so the appropriate overpriced tools can
be be found. From the minimal information you supplied, I can't offer
much help.
--
Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
831.336.2558 voice
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us jeffl@cruzio.com